no matter how many times u state that im a fat ugly dumb bytch and how u want to lay hands on me will change the fact that u made a stupid ass baseless statement on the coli, nikka.
Chess not checkers..
Keep on deflecting, u angry bytch
what did Doc's post about tall men=healthy offspring has to do with female preferences and darker skin women being less fertil?
nikka are u drunk or on drugs?
just another angry peasant that i succeeded in pissin off
The fukk is this
just another angry peasant that i succeeded in pissin off
U know how i be breh
Yes it is shytting on dark skin women but the whole light skin being more associated to estrogen and dark skin with testosterone sounds so damn dumb you can't help but to laughSO coli is this post NOT shytTIN on dark skin black women???
Yes it is shytting on dark skin women but the whole light skin being more associated to estrogen and dark skin with testosterone sounds so damn dumb you can't help but to laugh
Duke posted this, my whole argument was that both attractions could be justified with some scientific mumbo jumbo. In the thread opening post I CLEARLY state
To make a couple of things clear:
1. I am a dark skinned male and proud of it. My sisters and mom are dark, I am very attracted to dark skinned black women (Bria Myles is my wifey) and AM NOT A c00n who thinks anything light is better
2. I am 6 ft., not tall, but not short enough where I've ever been turned down for my height. This is not me being resentful, even though I don't consider myself tall, the average woman (5'6 or so) would probably consider me tall.
Playing the devil's advocate, it seems black women are the ones who are the most focused on height. I've literally met so many black chicks who are 4'11 and say they would never date a man under 6'2. That's fine, its a personal choice. But how is it any different than a man who refuses to date women of darker shades? Complexion is, after all, just as arbitrary as height
The theory is shytting on dark skin women.
