What part of medically viable do you not get?
All of Their organs and systems are not fully developed /able to function at a high enough
Level to live independently outside of the womb.
They can not live outside of the womb.
Maryland Father Confessed to Killing His 2-Year-old Daughter & Her Mother over child support
- Thread starter Matt504
- Start date
What part of medically viable do you not get?
All of Their organs and systems are not fully developed /able to function at a high enough
Level to live independently outside of the womb.
They can not live outside of the womb.
So again are u saying dependence is the deciding factor on whether or not a human being can be killed?
No
What I am doing is just responding to your stupid question "what makes a newborn viable and not a child inside the womb?"
You asked the stupid question and it struck me as so blindingly dumb that I chose to answer for you.
I'm not playing this game with you.
Btw why don't you pop up in any of the "this bytch trapped me" or "raw sex feels so good, I can't help myself" threads to challenge all the abortion comments there?
Why are you bringing up abortion in this thread when clearly this mother did not opt for abortion?
Is your argument that if women have the right to abortion up to about 3 months in most cases that it's perfectly reasonable for men to murder children of any age???
Oh okay. So because abortion up to 3 months is currently legal toddlers who can walk and talk are fair game.
I'm here for civil discussion ur talkin bout something...I dnt even rlly understand what u going on about...but I won't focus on ur uneccesary disrespect..back to the meat of the discussion
You said a child being able to live independently without the mother's body determines his viability and right to life.
I'm saying that our bodies are not autonomous so in or outside the womb a child depends on our bodies to sustain his life so a child outside the womb is still dependent on our, or in this case the woman's even outside the womb
So again I'm asking based on your claims
Is dependency the deciding factor on whether or not we can kill a human bein?
No he's saying abortion is as much of a murder as killing a toddler
Period
TwistedMetal
Ruined Childhood
One could argue morally they are the same.
One could go ahead and argue that if they'd like.
Perhaps ole boy the baby murderer should make that case as his defense.
That's the only reason it's even being brought up in this thread any way
So people can back handedly defend the fukk who shot a 2 year old who could walk and talk while she was strapped in her carseat, left her to suffer and die alone.
The mother in this story, who was also murdered didn't have an abortion.
Eta - we all hate hate hate when white folks bring up black on black crime as a rebuttal to cops freely murdering black folks in the street right? And we are 100% right to so so
This is the same thing. No just because some women have abortions it doesn't absolve this demon of shooting that baby
In other words, it's theoretically A-Okay to sadistically murder a child as long as it's not yours?
Thanks for clearing that up for us, you psychopathic sonofabytch.
My nikka why the fukk else would she be putting a man on child support if she can afford the kid???
Is this a serious fukkin question?
Labadi_Mantse
All Star
In other words, it's theoretically A-Okay to sadistically murder a child as long as it's not yours?
Thanks for clearing that up for us, you psychopathic sonofabytch.
Is that what I said? You're obviously thirsty af because I have several posts admonishing the killers behavior. The man clearly did not give a fukk about the mother or child and trying to label the child his 'daugther' when he didn't see her as a such is short sighted and naive. Stfu.
Let's break this down. Try to keep up.
The topic is a scumbag who viciously killed a 2 year old child and her mother. The atrocity of this crime is only magnified by the fact that the child is his own daughter.
YOU decided to bring up the fact that maybe this piece of shyt didn't believe the kid was his, so therefore his actions of killing a toddler are a bit more reasonable. You don't have to explicitly say it, you implied it. Which is a point only a fukk ass ni66a would even attempt to bring up in the first place.
Expect to receive your tuition bill in the mail for me taking you to school.
Labadi_Mantse
All Star
Ok, like i sad youre obviously mad thirsty to argue with someone. Where did I say he didn't believe the child was his? Where did I say his actions were reasonable? You haven't taken shyt to school. Youre the only idiot who is dumb enough to make the assertions that you are. The point is this man didn't see the mother or daugther as 'family.' They were a burden and hindrance. People need to understand that not everyone sees life the same way they do. That's the point I'm making. Clearly he didn't see this baby as his daughter which is why I said folks need to stop with the 'that's his daughter.'
Most people (unless you're a male) have no idea how stressful it is to try to Co-parent, let alone being on child support.
I got a patna who keeps his kid Friday thru Monday faithfully. He lives in same area as his BM so his son goes to school from his house on Monday then returns on Friday. He still HAS to pay 425$ for child support. And that's just one kid out of the three that he has.
I've also worked with dudes who have TWO full time jobs, one for child support and the other to live off of. One dude was paying 775/mth for two kids. Thats basically one whole check. Then his BM was complaining about him never spending time with the kid. Aint no time left bihhhh