@Matt504 eat a dikk fukkboy

Ronnie Lott

#49erGang
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
63,165
Reputation
10,420
Daps
225,547
I'll take a week ban if you can quote me saying I regret my own existence.



@Matt504

Did you grow up in a 2 parent household with an above average income?

no, I grew up in a two parent household in poverty and my parents split when I was about 15.

Should your parents have been sterilized?

I'm still waiting on the answer to this too.

"y'all need to ban matt because he says that poor people shouldn't have children they can't afford and that the government should sponsor their vasectomies or tubal ligations until they've proven that they have the ability to financially support a child"




I literally had this discussion earlier with my girlfriend and the answer is yes.

"but but but you wouldn't be here"


so what? my parents would have had less strain in their lives not raising two children in poverty.

:francis:

@cook @Brooklynzson @Jason Life Jason Death
Take that ban homie:laff:
 
Last edited:

Matt504

YSL as a gang must end
Joined
Sep 7, 2013
Messages
45,443
Reputation
15,239
Daps
275,807
Take that ban homie:laff:

me acknowledging that my parents would have had less strain in their lives if they weren't poor and raising two children is not me saying that I regret my own existence.

It always comes to this with you and the English language, I'm surprised you've made it this far in life without basic reading comprehension skills.
 

HellRell804

Banned
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
4,327
Reputation
2,725
Daps
22,913
Reppin
NULL
U.S. Government's Role in Sterilizing Women of Color


The U.S. Government's Role in Sterilizing Women of Color
operatingroom.jpg






SHARE




PIN




EMAIL

By Nadra Kareem Nittle, Race Relations Expert
Imagine going to the hospital for a common surgical procedure such as an appendectomy, only to find out afterward that you’d beensterilized. In the 20th century, untold numbers of women of color endured such life-altering experiences in part because of medical racism.Black, Native American and Puerto Rican women report being sterilized without their consent after undergoing routine medical procedures or, ironically, after giving birth.

Continue Reading Below

Others say they unknowingly signed documentation allowing them to be sterilized or were coerced into doing so. The experiences of these women strained relations betweenpeople of color and healthcare personnel. In the 21st century, members of communities of color still widely distrust medical officials.

Black Women Sterilized in North Carolina
Countless numbers of Americans who were poor, mentally ill, from minority backgrounds or otherwise regarded as “undesirable” were sterilized as the eugenics movement gained momentum in the United States.

See Also: Schwarzenegger Mildred Baena, Strom Thurmond daughter, Dominique Strauss-Kahn maid, Duke Lacrosse Scandal, Sally Hemings Thomas Jefferson, Divine Brown Hugh Grant, sex scandals

Eugenicists believed that measures should be taken to prevent undesirables from reproducing so that problems such as poverty, substance abuse, etc., would be eliminated in future generations. By the 1960s, tens of thousands of Americans were sterilized in state run eugenics programs, according to NBC News. North Carolina was one of 31 states to adopt such a program.

Between 1929 and 1974 in North Carolina, 7,600 people were sterilized. Eighty-five percent of those sterilized were women and girls, while 40 percent were minorities (most of whom were black).


Continue Reading Below
The eugenics program was eliminated in 1977 but legislation permitting involuntary sterilization of residents remained on the books until 2003. Since then, the state has tried to devise a way to compensate those it sterilized. Up to 2000 victims were believed to be still living in 2011. Elaine Riddikk, an African-American woman, is one of the survivors. She says she was sterilized after giving birth in 1967 to a child she conceived after a neighbor raped her when she was just 13 years old. “Got to the hospital and they put me in a room and that’s all I remember,” she told NBC News. “When I woke up, I woke up with bandages on my stomach.” She didn’t discover that she’d been sterilized until a doctor informed her that she’d been “butchered” when Riddikk was unable to have children with her husband. The state’s eugenics board ruled that she should be sterilized after she was described in records as “promiscuous” and “feebleminded.”

Puerto Rican Women Robbed of Reproductive Rights
More than a third of women in the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico were sterilized from the 1930s to the 1970s as a result of a partnership between the U.S. government, Puerto Rican lawmakers and medical officials. The United States has ruled the island since 1898. In the decades following, Puerto Rico experienced a number of economic problems, including a high unemployment rate. Government officials decided that the island’s economy would experience a boost if the population were reduced. Many of the women targeted were reportedly working class, as doctors didn’t think poor women could manage to effectively use contraception. Moreover, many women received sterilizations for free or for very little money as they entered the work force. Before long, Puerto Rico won the dubious distinction of having the world’s highest sterilization rate. So common was the procedure that it was widely known as “La Operacion” among islanders. Thousands of men in Puerto Rico underwent sterilizations as well. Roughly a third of Puerto Ricans sterilized reportedly did not understand the nature of the procedure, including that it meant they would not be able to bear children in the future.

Sterilization was not the only way in which Puerto Rican women’s reproductive rights were violated. U.S. pharmaceutical researchers also experimented on Puerto Rican women forhuman trials of the birth control pill in the 1950s. Many women experienced severe side effects such as nausea and vomiting. Three even died. The participants had not been told that the birth control pill was experimental and that they were participating in a clinical trial, only that they were taking medication to prevent pregnancy. The researchers in that study were later accused of exploiting women of color to acquire FDA approval of their drug.

The Sterilization of Native American Women
Native American women also report enduring government-ordered sterilizations. Jane Lawrence details their experiences in her Summer 2000 piece for American Indian Quarterly—“The Indian Health Service and the Sterilization of Native American Women.”Lawrence reports how two teenage girls had their tubes tied without their consent after undergoing appendectomies at an Indian Health Service (IHS) hospital in Montana. Also, a young American Indian woman visited a doctor asking for a “womb transplant,” apparently unaware that no such procedure exists and that the hysterectomy she’d had earlier meant that she and her husband would never have biological children. “What happened to these three females was a common occurrence during the 1960s and 1970s,” Lawrence states. “Native Americans accused the Indian Health Service of sterilizing at least 25 percent of Native American women who were between the ages of 15 and 44 during the 1970s.” Lawrence reports that Native American women say INS officials did not give them complete information about sterilization procedures, coerced them to sign paperwork consenting to such procedures and gave them improper consent forms, to name a few. Lawrence says Native American women were targeted for sterilization because they had higher birthrates than white women and that white male doctors used minority women to gain expertise in performing gynecological procedures, among other dubious reasons.

Cecil Adams of the Straight Dope website has questioned whether as many Native American women were sterilized as Lawrence cited in her piece. However, he does not deny that women of color were indeed targets of sterilization. Those women who were sterilized reportedly suffered greatly. Many marriages ended in divorce and the development of mental health problems ensued.
 

Ronnie Lott

#49erGang
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
63,165
Reputation
10,420
Daps
225,547
me acknowledging that my parents would have had less strain in their lives if they weren't poor and raising two children is not me saying that I regret my own existence.

It always comes to this with you and the English language, I'm surprised you've made it this far in life without basic reading comprehension skills.


I knew the deflections would happen :laff:

full
 

Supa cat

Catset Don Dada
Joined
Feb 21, 2015
Messages
12,583
Reputation
6,802
Daps
67,470
Take that ban homie:laff:

me acknowledging that my parents would have had less strain in their lives if they weren't poor and raising two children is not me saying that I regret my own existence.

It always comes to this with you and the English language, I'm surprised you've made it this far in life without basic reading comprehension skills.

I knew the deflections would happen :laff:

full

you should really spend more time offline reading. You're too old to be out here unable to grasp basic concepts concerning your native language.


:laff: i dont know why this has me dying
 

ZoeGod

I’m from Brooklyn a place where stars are born.
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
9,173
Reputation
4,610
Daps
52,684
Reppin
Brooklyn,NY
I disagree with @Matt504 with the whole Toxic masculinity bs because to it is a BS term made up clown sociology majors. He said telling your son not to cry and man up is toxic masculinity. Also the other thing I disagree with him is this notion that black men are somehow oppressing black women and black gays which sounds ridiculous. Aside from that we agree on whole lot of other points. He is smart and a great debater. You need to be on top of your shyt to debate. He doesn't back down. I learned to respect him cuz he is a real one. And its funny that @Poitier and @Matt504 are cool with each other but disagree on a whole lot of issues. When they debate each other its like
68747470733a2f2f73332e616d617a6f6e6177732e636f6d2f776174747061642d6d656469612d736572766963652f53746f7279496d6167652f4b52694c647838463166747479673d3d2d35373536373136362e313434326466363938613630366232632e676966
but they still cool. :mjlol:
 

Matt504

YSL as a gang must end
Joined
Sep 7, 2013
Messages
45,443
Reputation
15,239
Daps
275,807
I disagree with @Matt504 with the whole Toxic masculinity bs because to it is a BS term made up clown sociology majors. He said telling your son not to cry and man up is toxic masculinity. Also the other thing I disagree with him is this notion that black men are somehow oppressing black women and black gays which sounds ridiculous. Aside from that we agree on whole lot of other points. He is smart and a great debater. You need to be on top of your shyt to debate. He doesn't back down. I learned to respect him cuz he is a real one. And its funny that @Poitier and @Matt504 are cool with each other but disagree on a whole lot of issues. When they debate each other its like
68747470733a2f2f73332e616d617a6f6e6177732e636f6d2f776174747061642d6d656469612d736572766963652f53746f7279496d6167652f4b52694c647838463166747479673d3d2d35373536373136362e313434326466363938613630366232632e676966
but they still cool. :mjlol:

that's my brother.

:manny:
 

PlainSight

Anon
Joined
Sep 26, 2013
Messages
5,387
Reputation
1,410
Daps
13,046
Reppin
UK
Don't agree with Matt on everything, but most of the time I'm :ehh: with his statements regarding masculinity, women and LGBT.

Dunno about that whole sterilization thing though :patrice:, that's a bit mad, can't cosign if true.
 

mrken12

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
80,803
Reputation
20,950
Daps
300,410
Reppin
Maryland
Don't agree with Matt on everything, but most of the time I'm :ehh: with his statements regarding masculinity, women and LGBT.

Dunno about that whole sterilization thing though :patrice:, that's a bit mad, can't cosign if true.
LGBT? He's obviously a hypocrite since he uses gay accusations as insults. He's a fraud.
 
Top