Meek Mill Denied New Trial By judge

[nieman]

He never should've been on probation in the first place.

Say "let's focus on people that have been serving time due to said officer" when that applies to Meek Mill, brehs.

Ask "new trial for what?" when the officer that arrested him has been outed as corrupt, brehs.

I get that there is other people to rally behind but you cats act attention given to Meek takes away from other people this dikk head officer wrongly accused....which clearly ain't the case because 800+ cases were dismissed or overturned due to this corruption investigation. So....why be angry over this?

Fred.

It's not 800 cases being dismissed or overturned. It's more like 3 in this particular situation. And his was arrested on the gun and a hand-to-hand with resisting arrest. Which he's said time and time again that he had the gun. Okay, mind you this is 10+ years ago. He didn't even try for appeal when first sentenced. He had Charlie Mack behind him and didn't try to appeal it then. I'm more than sure that Charlie Mack gave him advice on handling the situation, going forward. He's had numerous chances to appeal, get a retrial, judge thrown off case and he hasn't even tried until this last incident. You have a full legal team now, and they aren't advising you how to beat this? The court of public opinion will only take you so far. My point is that we wouldn't even be having this discussion if he wasn't doing what he had to go to get off probation. People would've forgot about his even being locked up. He's done his share to be in the situation that he's still in. He's had more chances than most, and still manages to have those missteps. What happened happened, and you have to make decisions that make you less susceptible to be in that same situation again. If you want to be a political rebel, you can be a political rebel, but you're gonna be met with the same scrutiny that comes with it. And you have to be smarter about your actions.

Yes the justice system does need to be reformed. But people don't want to do what they can to actually reform it. No one wants to be cops, judges, lawyers so it'll always be the have vs the have-nots; the people on the bottom power at the mercy of the people in powerful positions.

 

[KravenMorehead™]

A day is coming, when everyone will be held accountable for the bullshyt they did, but got away with.

I hope the world keeps this same energy.

 

[hex]

It's not 800 cases being dismissed or overturned. It's more like 3 in this particular situation.

I need to stop you right there because you clearly have no idea what you're talking about.

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/l...-tainted-misconduct-secret-list-20180306.html

The most recent such scandal unfolded when prosecutors charged seven narcotics officers with corruption. While one officer pleaded guilty and cooperated with the probe, the six others were acquitted. So far, prosecutors have thrown out 800 cases of those officers. About 300 defendants have sued the city after the dismissals. With less than a third of those suits resolved, the city has agreed to pay out more than $2 million in settlements.

Why do you cats come in these threads and argue on behalf of the judge and/or Meek "just serving his time"....or whatever kind of nonsense you're peddling....when the D.A. said he needs a retrial. When the Supreme Court agreed that he never should've been locked up in the first place. When the FBI has investigated that same judge you're co-signing.

If the Supreme Court and the D.A. are on Meek's side in this situation....why aren't you? People always expose themselves in these Meek threads. Like clockwork.

Fred.

 

[Sinister]

A day is coming, when everyone will be held accountable for the bullshyt they did, but got away with.

I hope the world keeps this same energy.

What are you implying?

 

[nieman]

I need to stop you right there because you clearly have no idea what you're talking about.

Under court order, District Attorney Krasner releases list of tainted police



Why do you cats come in these threads and argue on behalf of the judge and/or Meek "just serving his time"....or whatever kind of nonsense you're peddling....when the D.A. said he needs a retrial. When the Supreme Court agreed that he never should've been locked up in the first place. When the FBI has investigated that same judge you're co-signing.

If the Supreme Court and the D.A. are on Meek's side in this situation....why aren't you? People always expose themselves in these Meek threads. Like clockwork.

Fred.

They're all talking about the most recent incident(s) that resulted in him going to jail, NOT the initial arrest. The judge was investigated after the accusations by Meek's team recently. Never before but since they He's been in jail like 3 different times for this same case. Why not argue for the other 2?

The people aren't even arguing the same thing. All of his high profile supporters, including the DA are arguing that him receiving 2-4 for such minor violations were harsh. That's it. The argument was if he's gonna go back to jail for the would've been sentence, let it be for something bigger than that. He's too influential. And I agree with that. But what you can't argue against is that his repeated actions lead him back to the sentencing. And the Supreme Court denied his request for a new judge after hearing the accusations/evidence.

And I do support black judges too. I don't want her disbarred for ish that they can't even prove that she did because she refuses to give a man another break. THAT'S where my opinion diffs from a lot of people.

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

Idc a lot. Just wanted to write that.

 

[Bawon Samedi]

I thought this shyt was over.

 

[MusicConsulting]

i have a feeling we are getting philly braid meek back. You see what happens? this court system is such trash. he’s already served enough time . this is going to backfire on this judge.

 

[KravenMorehead™]

What are you implying?

don't worry about it.

 

[THE MACHINE]

Quoted myelf to make something clear... in no way am I saying that the same judge should be presiding over anything else dealing with meek mill... theres obviously gonna be personal feelings by now. So thats definitely something that should have been addressed. There should be a new judge...
my point is, this situation would be totally different if meek mills actions would have been different this entire time

I think you are giving the initial charges too much validity. If you stole some 150$ Jordans from a retail store and they gave you a felony grand theft charge, you would be hot too. 10 years of probation for a recording artist can be cumbersome. Yes, you definitely hold some responsibility for stealing J's (having a firearm in Meeks situation) but the charges and lengthy probation is a joke. Then you find out your bogus charges were filed by a corrupt cop, and you have a power hungry judge. Then everybody is telling you "you shouldn't have popped a wheelie" "you're lucky you didn't get a felony", 10 years later when you get sentenced to 2-4 years in prison, when the cops were right there and didn't give you a ticket.
Again, Meek takes some blame for the gun and drug charges, since it appears he did have a gun and drugs...but 10 years probation? Judge never called you in to say. "Look, I see you are a father, you employ people now and pay a lot of state taxes. let's see if we can knock off a few years of this probation. Or let's come up with a plan on how we can reduce this."

 

[KRiLL (+)]

I don't understand. So Meek got convicted for aiming a gun at police. But since then he's become a star artist and entrepreneur. Why does she still want him in the system?

but the thing is the cop who said he did that was crooked & got exposed like last year so it's like wtf more needs to happen for this shyt to be over...

 

[Sinister]

don't worry about it.

I agree with what you said but I think you're applying it in a context that is not completely appropriate.

There are consequences for everyone's actions that cannot be avoided. When people get punished for what they do they won't know what hit them.

I don't think that Meek's case is that high on the list of things that people are doing wrong though.

 

[KravenMorehead™]

I agree with what you said but I think you're applying it in a context that is not completely appropriate.

There are consequences for everyone's actions that cannot be avoided. When people get punished for what they do they won't know what hit them.

I don't think that Meek's case is that high on the list of things that people are doing wrong though.

Bet.

 

[The Devil's Advocate]

I think you are giving the initial charges too much validity. If you stole some 150$ Jordans from a retail store and they gave you a felony grand theft charge, you would be hot too. 10 years of probation for a recording artist can be cumbersome. Yes, you definitely hold some responsibility for stealing J's (having a firearm in Meeks situation) but the charges and lengthy probation is a joke. Then you find out your bogus charges were filed by a corrupt cop, and you have a power hungry judge. Then everybody is telling you "you shouldn't have popped a wheelie" "you're lucky you didn't get a felony", 10 years later when you get sentenced to 2-4 years in prison, when the cops were right there and didn't give you a ticket.
Again, Meek takes some blame for the gun and drug charges, since it appears he did have a gun and drugs...but 10 years probation? Judge never called you in to say. "Look, I see you are a father, you employ people now and pay a lot of state taxes. let's see if we can knock off a few years of this probation. Or let's come up with a plan on how we can reduce this."

and then throw on top, everyone that is supposed to be against you.... prosecution, other judges, lawyers, mayor, etc etc... are all fighting FOR your release. now when in the fukk does that ever happen?? and they are all saying "please judge, please let this man go free"... and the judge is like "nah fukk that shyt... he popped a wheelie"

like come on... DA recommendations will get a stone cold murderer a reduction from death to 25 with parole.. they can suggest turning a murder 1 into a manslaughter 2... they can ask to go from life with no parole to 10 years... judges usually just go with what they offer up... sometimes saying fukk that, in extreme cases


is this some extreme case?? is this some harsh crimes where the judges just ignore the wishes of the people trying the case?? or is this broad over reaching, over punishing, and ignoring all pleas for REAL rehabilitation, because she has ulterior motives??


hell yea you gonna pick a side.. and it damn sure looks fishy from the judges side

 

[Will Ross]

Meek mistake was publicly embarrassing a woman that has so much power over his freedom.