Men and women DON'T NEED each other anymore

[AquaCityBoy]

If they can't then "women's intuition" and the idea that women are better at reading body language and social cues are bullshìt.

No what that means is men either know how to hide it better, or don't think about how what they're doing is harmful to women. Every guy is a 'nice guy' until he isn't.

This flippant response is exactly why women are distrustful of men.

 

[Shadow King]

No what that means is men either know how to hide it better, or don't think about how what they're doing is harmful to women. Every guy is a 'nice guy' until he isn't.

This flippant response is exactly why women are distrustful of men.

My response was no more flippant than the nonsense you ran in here with inferring men at large are capable of becoming mass murderers over sex or anything at all.

You sound like the women you're caping for.

 

[Wildhundreds]

Nature...and the society that it breeds, is stronger than y'all care to admit. Which is where generalities come from.

"Someone just for you" is some fairytale shìt...again, I have my belief where the species is and "just for you" ain't in it.

Boxed in would be doing what you and most people think I'm supposed to do and keep putting with the bullshyt for "that special one"...this more freedom than being boxed in.

If "nature" breeds society, then society would be perfect. Remember, society is the one that's destroying nature.. Unless you define nature as something else other than whats outside..

And I believe generalizing people is a coping mechanism when you're having different grasping something. If brings you comfort to know that its them and not you.

Do you believe ALL men who are in relationships are miserable, but faking like they are ok?

 

[AquaCityBoy]

My response was no more flippant than the nonsense you ran in here with inferring men at large are capable of becoming mass murderers over sex or anything at all.

You sound like the women you're caping for.

Certainly more capable than women. I see you didn't give any examples of a female Elliott Rodger.

You keep proving why women are distrustful of men.

 

[$cam-U-Well_Jack$on]

No clicks shall be given. fakkitry.

 

[Shadow King]

If "nature" breeds society, then society would be perfect. Remember, society is the one that's destroying nature.. Unless you define nature as something else other than whats outside..

And I believe generalizing people is a coping mechanism when you're having different grasping something. If brings you comfort to know that its them and not you.

Do you believe ALL men who are in relationships are miserable, but faking like they are ok?

One thing breeding something does not mean the two things would be 1 = 1. So no, nature breeding society does not mean society would be perfect.

Again, you say that, and are generalizing in and of itself, because of what you believe about other people. Still practicing hypocrisy.

Nowhere did I say anything about the happiness levels of any number of men in relationships...you're taking statements to the extreme to make strawmen arguments.

 

[Shadow King]

Female masquerading as male babble

Aight...you done?

 

[Wildhundreds]

One thing breeding something does not mean the two things would be 1 = 1. So no, nature breeding society does not mean society would be perfect.

Again, you say that, and are generalizing in and of itself, because of what you believe about other people. Still practicing hypocrisy.

Nowhere did I say anything about the happiness levels of any number of men in relationships...you're taking statements to the extreme to make strawmen arguments.

Remember, you have the women problems. And because you've had problems with women since you were born 30 years ago, you generalize women. You cannot drag me into that pit you're wallowing in.

 

[Shadow King]

Remember, you have the women problems. And because you've had problems with women since you were born 30 years ago, you generalize women. You cannot drag me into that pit you're wallowing in.

So again, you prove to be full of shìt?

 

[Wildhundreds]

So again, you prove to be full of shìt?

Call it what you want. But I guarantee you I can get a pack of women who would roll with me before you. And having a woman isn't even a big deal for me.

 

[dblive]

People been "shacking" forever.. Even during the days when people believe the housing was dirt cheap.

Right, which means we need each other

 

[Shadow King]

Call it what you want. But I guarantee you I can get a pack of women who would roll with me before you. And having a woman isn't even a big deal for me.

All irrelevant to the claims you made to be open to different perspectives.

So yes, I'll call it being the full of shìt curmudgeon you've always been.

 

[Wildhundreds]

All irrelevant to the claims you made to be open to different perspectives.

So yes, I'll call it being the full of shìt curmudgeon you've always been.

I haven't rejected any other perspectives in this thread. Not even you saying you a Homo Sapiens and nature made you the person you are.. Whatever you say about me and who I am, I know for a fact i don't have the women problems you have.

So at the end of the day, my hypocrite a$$ is good.

 

[Shadow King]

I haven't rejected any other perspectives in this thread. Not even you saying you a Homo Sapiens and nature made you the person you are.. Whatever you say about me and who I am, I know for a fact i don't have the women problems you have.

So at the end of the day, my hypocrite a$$ is good.

Yes, because you agree with them. You cannot reject me or you being Homo Sapiens, because that is the scientific name for human, that isn't even a perspective.

Keep thinking you flexing. You ain't.

 

[AquaCityBoy]

Aight...you done?

Of course someone on the coli would say the obvious fact that women are distrustful of men is "female masquerading as male babble"... which is part of the reason why women are distrustful of men.

You gonna give any examples of female Elliott Rodger or did you start an argument you were ill equipped for?