MajorVitaman
Superstar
Matt out here getting ready to block for the white man on some
#Metoo Next Target: USA Today Wants Chris Brown to get R. Kelly Treatment
- Thread starter Dynamite James
- Start date
What's the last stupid thing he did and when was it?Stayed out of trouble.
It's almost as if people that write things explaining their positions are wasting their time. Chris Brown can't seem to stay out of trouble.
Last time I heard about CB in the news was when a white female lied on him and they sent a swat team to his house
I'll never understand how the general public is more mad at him than she is ffs
Can you post this photo?"Stayed out of trouble"?The fool was less than a year ago photographed choking a woman in broadaylight at his house and once threatened to beat up Tyson Beckford's son when he was in high school.
What do you consider stayed out of trouble?
Breh these posters just say anythingHe says or does dumb shyt every year. He has never had a scandal free year, 2 years after the Rihanna incident he went on TV smashing windows and once threw a rock at his mom in rehab. If Rihanna did that shyt we would be talking about it to this day. Instead we got fools talking about he "stayed out of trouble". Let a Black woman who was abused throw a rock at their mom and smash windows and see what is said
And one of his biggest accusers dropped the charges...
sayyestothis
Free the guys
Dont get it. Chris should get r kelly treatment.
Anyone laying hands on females is dead to me in my book.
Anyone laying hands on females is dead to me in my book.
General public wants their pound of black flesh monthly
Can't have nikkas with money walking around in these dire financial times
Which one of his accusers "dropped the charges"?
Ashley Judd iirc
If you could correctly, you'd also know that she didn't drop any charges.
good luck to chris but i dont think this is the nikka to rally around and all that.
Dynamite James
The Main attraction
Who the fukk is rallying?!
I'm tired of this deflection.
People are just calling out the bullshyt.
Stop being dense.
Oh
Judge Dismisses Ashley Judd's Sexual Harassment Claim Against Harvey Weinstein
A federal judge in California has dismissed Ashley Judd's claim of sexual harassment in her lawsuit against disgraced former mega-producer Harvey Weinstein. But the judge also said Judd can pursue her accusation that Weinstein tried to ruin her career after she rejected his advances.
Weinstein is facing charges of five counts of rape and sexual assault at a trial in New York later this year. Dozens of women have accused Weinstein of rape and sexual misconduct that allegedly took place over decades. Weinstein has said his encounters were consensual and that he never sexually assaulted anyone.
U.S. District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez granted a motion from Weinstein's defense team to dismiss the harassment portion of Judd's lawsuit, agreeing that at the time of the alleged offense, the law cited in the suit did not cover producers such as Weinstein.
Instead, Gutierrez said Judd can continue with the part of her lawsuit that accuses Weinstein of sabotaging her job chances for blockbuster projects such as Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings films.
It's the second time Gutierrez has dismissed the harassment portion of the suit, having initially done so in September. Judd filed to restore the claim in October, after California's Legislature amended the state's harassment law to specifically include directors and producers.
Judd argued that the amendment should apply retroactively to her case. But the judge ruled that lawmakers had "modified, rather than clarified" the 1999 law, making it inappropriate to apply its new standards retroactively.
Gutierrez took pains to say he "is not determining whether Plaintiff was sexually harassed in the colloquial sense of the term," but only whether the incident fell under the scope of the statute her lawsuit cited.
According to Judd's lawsuit, she met with the Weinstein in late 1996 or early 1997, when he invited her to a breakfast meeting at the Peninsula Hotel in Beverly Hills.
The actress was hoping the "evaluative" meeting would cement her chances of landing big film roles — but when she arrived at the hotel, her lawsuit states, Weinstein was waiting for her in a bathrobe. He allegedly then asked to give her a massage and asked her to watch him take a shower.
In an attempt to leave the room, Judd says, she made a "mock bargain" with Weinstein, "suggesting that she would consider letting him touch her only if she won an Academy Award in one of his films."
Judd says the producer repeatedly reminded her of that "little deal" — and that he also badmouthed her to Jackson.
Despite "serious discussions to play a major role in the Lord of the Rings trilogy," court documents state, Judd wasn't cast in the film. Judd says she didn't learn of a possible reason until 2017, when Jackson said in an interview that Weinstein had told him Judd was "a nightmare to work with" who should be avoided "at all costs."
The judge said Judd had "adequately stated a claim for defamation, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, and violation of the [Unfair Competition Law]," based on her allegation that Weinstein retaliated against her.
Is this the only pic from this incident?