Michael Wilbon: Black Folks and analytics don't mix

Are you Black? do you "like analytics?"

  • I am Black, African American, etc

  • I am not Black

  • I like & understand analytics

  • I don't have a use for analytics at all

  • I don't understand and don't want to understand analytics

  • I like or use analytics in moderation

  • Analytics is the best way to measure how good or bad someone or team is in sports

  • The Eye test is the best way to measure how good or bad someone or team is in sports

  • a mix of analytics and eye test is the best way to determin how good or bad someone or team is


Results are only viewable after voting.

SchoolboyC

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
25,107
Reputation
4,675
Daps
106,777
When people say "I hate analytics" they are really saying "The unbiased data doesn't support my hunches and gut feelings so I reject it"

From my experience this is what I see a lot. People love to pull up stats when they support their claim but when they don't then all of a sudden stats are for geeks/white people and have no credibility
 

Full Measures

All Star
Joined
Nov 23, 2013
Messages
2,911
Reputation
-150
Daps
6,015
This a decent read but my opposition to analytics has nothing to do with me being black. My opposition comes from me actually playing the game and being around the game since I came out of the womb

I think there is a place for a segment of analytics in the game but I know if you try to build a team based purely off analytics that you're going to fall flat on your face trying to win with them. See the Houston Rockets

I don't need a spreadsheet of numbers to tell me whether a college prospect can play in the NBA although sometimes they can be helpful. I'm just of the opinion that the eye test supersedes all when it comes to player and team evaluations. But it's impossible to watch film on every game of course unless you're @ZBO's Deep Thoughts :mjlol: so teams use large amounts of data like analytics to help them get a grasp on what players strengths and weaknesses are but people go overboard with it
 

I.AM.PIFF

You're minor, we're major
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
13,125
Reputation
11,690
Daps
40,773
To me it just seems to be over analyzing and takes the fun and passion out but white ppl dont like fun and passion in sports to begin with
..see baseball

Well, it's also a job and they're playing professionals. Owners are investing millions in players/staff/analytics and probably would like to see results :manny:
 

Bilz

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,154
Reputation
1,355
Daps
37,335
Reppin
Los Angeles
From my experience this is what I see a lot. People love to pull up stats when they support their claim but when they don't then all of a sudden stats are for geeks/white people and have no credibility
Exactly. Wilbon is the type that doesn't know how to use the numbers. If the Spurs were down 3, Popovich would set up a play with screens and misdirections and get a wide open 3 for Green or Mills. It would be a very high percentage play considering the circumstances. In the event that it missed, a Michael Wilbon would say that they should have isolated for Kawhi and had him shoot the 3 because he shoots 45%, ignoring the fact that Kawhi didnt build that percentage taking contested 3 pointers in iso situations.
 

Buckeye Fever

YOU WILL ALL HAIL TO THE VICTORS!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
84,428
Reputation
44,832
Daps
392,990
Reppin
Hip-Hop Since '79
Analytics should be used at your white collar job(or blue collar if you're dealing with production efficiency).

Not for the athletes who play the shyt.

I was playin 2k last night. 9 minute quarter in the finals. I win game 1. I exit and go back to the playoff menu and them muthafukkaz analytically displayed what the score woulda been had i played 12 minute quarters:dwillhuh:
 

Bilz

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,154
Reputation
1,355
Daps
37,335
Reppin
Los Angeles
I think there is a place for a segment of analytics in the game but I know if you try to build a team based purely off analytics that you're going to fall flat on your face trying to win with them. See the Houston Rockets

What does this mean? Its not like analytics told them not to have LeBron or Curry, there are other limitations in play.
 

BucciMane

Kristina Schulman Bro
Supporter
Joined
Mar 4, 2015
Messages
37,103
Reputation
-2,466
Daps
81,389
Reppin
The Real Titletown
This a decent read but my opposition to analytics has nothing to do with me being black. My opposition comes from me actually playing the game and being around the game since I came out of the womb

I think there is a place for a segment of analytics in the game but I know if you try to build a team based purely off analytics that you're going to fall flat on your face trying to win with them. See the Houston Rockets

I don't need a spreadsheet of numbers to tell me whether a college prospect can play in the NBA although sometimes they can be helpful. I'm just of the opinion that the eye test supersedes all when it comes to player and team evaluations. But it's impossible to watch film on every game of course unless you're @ZBO's Deep Thoughts :mjlol: so teams use large amounts of data like analytics to help them get a grasp on what players strengths and weaknesses are but people go overboard with it

Exactly. There is a place for analytics, but too many people (the vast majority that love analytics) believe that they are the be all and end all, and that the analytics will always show which player is superior or which team will win a game. They should be used to see trends and favorable and unfavorable match-ups, but many of these analytic geeks think they are GM's when they have never stepped on a field, court, or rink.:mjlol:.

The way many people view analytics, there should be no need for a GM or any front office employees as they think analytics will predict everything perfectly.
 

PortCityProphet

Follow me to the truth
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
80,692
Reputation
17,595
Daps
274,859
Reppin
Bama ass DC
numbers are a black /white thing now?

no but all the analytics stuff is a way for those who couldn't/can't play to get involved. brothas were playing they know pts, rebs, assist, shot %...the basics. the team stat geek was the one coming up with things like defensive win shares whatever that is. it's not something that your average baller really looks at like that.
 

Alexander The Great

I ain't gonna say this sh*t again
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
28,304
Reputation
7,335
Daps
104,065
Analytics should be used at your white collar job(or blue collar if you're dealing with production efficiency).

Not for the athletes who play the shyt.

I was playin 2k last night. 9 minute quarter in the finals. I win game 1. I exit and go back to the playoff menu and them muthafukkaz analytically displayed what the score woulda been had i played 12 minute quarters:dwillhuh:
:pachaha:
 

tremonthustler1

aka bx_representer
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
87,395
Reputation
10,152
Daps
217,554
Reppin
My Pops Forever RIP
This a decent read but my opposition to analytics has nothing to do with me being black. My opposition comes from me actually playing the game and being around the game since I came out of the womb

I think there is a place for a segment of analytics in the game but I know if you try to build a team based purely off analytics that you're going to fall flat on your face trying to win with them. See the Houston Rockets
The Rockets are very hypocritical when it comes to analytics. That roster they put out there was NOT advanced metrics-friendly. That was the "what NOT to do analytics roster."
 
Top