At this point we are 
but still... 
Microsoft admits the Xbox One performs better without Kinect features
but still... Microsoft admits the Xbox One performs better without Kinect features
Microsoft admits the Xbox One performs better without Kinect features
- Thread starter DEAD7
- Start date
Uncle_Ruckus
We The North
Don't tell that to xbots though.
Engaged.net with a misinformed clickbait article
Sony Stans prepare the circle jerk
What's new in gaming today?
Sony Stans prepare the circle jerk
What's new in gaming today?
Engaged.net with a misinformed clickbait article
Sony Stans prepare the circle jerk
What's new in gaming today?
How is it clickbait?
NO kinect = freeing up more system resources and power for games.
It's common sense.
Engaged.net with a misinformed clickbait article
Sony Stans prepare the circle jerk
What's new in gaming today?
I saw this on theverge as well breh
The Xbox One is faster without Kinect | The Verge
How is it clickbait?
NO kinect = freeing up more system resources and power for games.
It's common sense.
"Microsoft admits" implies they were hiding something
"Despite everything we've heard about the Xbox One's Kinect sensor containing its own onboard processor, so that it doesn't weigh down the main console with voice- and image-recognition tasks"
Is just off base. They said from day one 10% was reserved for kinect, and they also said they would be giving that 10% back to devs eventually.
Dozens of publications have reported on this, including eurogamer who broke the story. Why post the article that clearly adds a bunch of their own B.S. on top of the news?
Homie is furious at a GOOD THING. :
Same there, "journalists" that have no idea what they are talking about.
It's not "X1 is faster without kinect"
The real story is "Microsoft has given devs the option to use resources formerly reserved for kinect"
Also some of the tools/improvements given to devs have nothing to do with kinect
But that just wouldn't get as many clicks
They wrote the titles purposely to fuel the kinect debate, instead of just reporting the news accurately.
OP posted it here, so y'all can get your circle jerk on.
Have fun
yall nikkas will post anything. Who really cares if it's "faster"? Faster in what way? Has anybody complained that the processing speed isn't fast enough? Wake me up when X1 and PS4 get some damn games worth playing
I wonder if an easy patch can be made for current games to take advantage of the extra power?
NZA
LOL
noI wonder if an easy patch can be made for current games to take advantage of the extra power?
Ze Pequeno
All Star
??Same there, "journalists" that have no idea what they are talking about.
It's not "X1 is faster without kinect"
The real story is "Microsoft has given devs the option to use resources formerly reserved for kinect"
Also some of the tools/improvements given to devs have nothing to do with kinect
But that just wouldn't get as many clicks
They wrote the titles purposely to fuel the kinect debate, instead of just reporting the news accurately.
OP posted it here, so y'all can get your circle jerk on.
Have fun
If the system had 10% of it's power reserved for Kinect usage and now since Kinect isn't mandatory that gives devs that 10% back for other things, how can you say
??
and now that those resources are free from Kinect usage, the X1 is faster thanks to that 10%(Of which was reserved for the Kinect) which is what the article is talking about. The tools is just extra like that DX12 thing ya'll talk about right?
Silly Meach, dumbassery is for kids.*Prepares to go back and forth for 3 pages*
Last edited: