(Beyonce grinding her ass all up in a strange man's face and lap with Jay's full knowledge)
OK, and part of that brand is playing up the image of an oversexualized archetype for financial gain. That's what's being criticized. You may not like his analogy or the verbage, but the overall poiint is valid. You're personally offended at the language he used because you disagree with his premise that a man reducing his wife to conform to the stereotypical image of a slut because its profitable is a tacky to do. The irony is back in the day her image was cleaner. She's gotten more ratchet musically and image wise since becoming a wife.
fukk it, they're hustling. Not hating on them making money. It just bothers me that this is the imagery the corporations package and sell to our young girls as if you can't be talented and go far without overtly making your sexuality a commodity.
Would never take my little girl to a Bey show.
(Beyonce grinding her ass all up in a strange man's face and lap with Jay's full knowledge)
OK, and part of that brand is playing up the image of an oversexualized archetype for financial gain. That's what's being criticized. You may not like his analogy or the verbage, but the overall poiint is valid. You're personally offended at the language he used because you disagree with his premise that a man reducing his wife to conform to the stereotypical image of a slut because its profitable is a tacky to do. The irony is back in the day her image was cleaner. She's gotten more ratchet musically and image wise since becoming a wife.
fukk it, they're hustling. Not hating on them making money. It just bothers me that this is the imagery the corporations package and sell to our young girls as if you can't be talented and go far without overtly making your sexuality a commodity.
Would never take my little girl to a Bey show.
(Beyonce grinding her ass all up in a strange man's face and lap with Jay's full knowledge)
OK, and part of that brand is playing up the image of an oversexualized archetype for financial gain. That's what's being criticized. You may not like his analogy or the verbage, but the overall poiint is valid. You're personally offended at the language he used because you disagree with his premise that a man reducing his wife to conform to the stereotypical image of a slut because its profitable is a tacky to do. The irony is back in the day her image was cleaner. She's gotten more ratchet musically and image wise since becoming a wife.
fukk it, they're hustling. Not hating on them making money. It just bothers me that this is the imagery the corporations package and sell to our young girls as if you can't be talented and go far without overtly making your sexuality a commodity.
Would never take my little girl to a Bey show.
"
