Minus well go for broke..Vikings Packers game thread

YouMadd?

Chakra Daddy
Bushed
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,192
Reputation
1,590
Daps
69,892
Reppin
California
Funny how you start from 03, how bout from 2000. Raiders damn sure went farther in the playoffs.
I just said 2003 because I figured a "decade" was enough of a sample size.... Seeing as though we are debating about the team that AD had the best chance of winning with when he came into the league. Going back to 2000 is fine, but then how much of these teams are the same after 7-8 years? Most of that 2000 raiders squad was retired by the time AD came in so that year is irrelevant for the most part... This is why I started with the year he came into the league. That wasn't good enough for you so I did an entire decade lol...
 

FloorGeneral

I don't even know anymore...
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,614
Reputation
2,685
Daps
22,718
Reppin
Packerland
What I love, and this was really prevalent on :hamster:, is there were plenty of ppl that said that the reason Rodgers was so good is because of his receivers. Now we have 2 (!!!) Practice Squad players out there flourishing. What say you now?!?
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
82,106
Reputation
10,321
Daps
242,391
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
Cobb will be back in 2 weeks i believe. The best part is we are injured during a nice little weak run on our schedule. James Jones should be ready to go next week. Clay Matthews should be back in 2 weeks as well

Cobb will be back around Thanksgiving. He broke his leg son.

Wow. Starks and Lacy are nasty. And they have worn down that DL pretty bad.
 

Bboystyle

FIRE MATT LAFLEUR
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
49,511
Reputation
6,804
Daps
83,376
Reppin
So. Cal
What I love, and this was really prevalent on :hamster:, is there were plenty of ppl that said that the reason Rodgers was so good is because of his receivers. Now we have 2(!!!) Practice Squad players out there flourishing. What say you now?!?


Nothing...them bytch nikkas in hiding. I brought this up last week.
 

yseJ

Empire strikes back
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
47,918
Reputation
2,969
Daps
70,920
Reppin
The Yay
What I love, and this was really prevalent on :hamster:, is there were plenty of ppl that said that the reason Rodgers was so good is because of his receivers. Now we have 2(!!!) Practice Squad players out there flourishing. What say you now?!?
people will always use good weapons/no weapons argument when trying to discredit/prop up a qb...

it was obvious towards the end that packer receiving core was wildly overrated.
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
82,106
Reputation
10,321
Daps
242,391
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
But but but Rodgers was blessed with an already good Offense....:heh:

I mean, he was. We had Driver, Jennings, Clifton, Tauscher, Ryan Grant, James Jones to start with in 08 and those guys were part of the squad going to the NFC Championship.

But this offensive line has been ballin. Rodgers hasn't been sacked that much this year, he's getting rid of the ball quicker and evading rushes too. Plus, this is by far the best running game since Ahman Green/Davenport/Fisher trio of 2003-2004.
 

Bboystyle

FIRE MATT LAFLEUR
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
49,511
Reputation
6,804
Daps
83,376
Reppin
So. Cal
I mean, he was. We had Driver, Jennings, Clifton, Tauscher, Ryan Grant, James Jones to start with in 08 and those guys were part of the squad going to the NFC Championship.

But this offensive line has been ballin. Rodgers hasn't been sacked that much this year, he's getting rid of the ball quicker and evading rushes too. Plus, this is by far the best running game since Ahman Green/Davenport/Fisher trio of 2003-2004.


yes he did, im not arguing that but nikkas said Rodgers flourished cuz of his system and weapons he have. Even with his weapons, this system had a shytty O-line and no run game. Now Rodgers still balling with only 1 weapon to throw to
 
Top