Mitch McConnell To Fox News: NRA Must Approve Of New Supreme Court Justice

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
302,087
Reputation
-34,036
Daps
611,646
Reppin
The Deep State
0dQ0G8N.gif
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
28,909
Reputation
4,589
Daps
63,473
hold them to the fire in what way? constantly talk about it? they did that with mcconnell's quote about making obama a one term president by simply not working with him. the voters rewarded the republicans with the house and senate. how about dem voters take responsibility for the fact that they take a vacation in off year elections and then cry about how those that were able to be reelected aren't delivering to their satisfaction.
That would not happen if Democrats actually did something in the other years. But I do agree.
 

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
18,227
Reputation
4,453
Daps
77,862
Reppin
The Arsenal
That would not happen if Democrats actually did something in the other years. But I do agree.
well when you don't have a majority the only way you can get things done is to work with the other side and give them the vast majority of what they want in order for you to get a tiny bit of what you want. in a situation like that it's best for us that nothing happens. and even when you have a majority, the senate is pretty much designed to not do anything without 60 senators (btw the mythical democrat supermajority of 2009 existed for like a month). look at the republicans now they have a majority in the house and senate and yet obama doesn't have to veto bills every week because hardly any bills gets out of the damn place.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
28,909
Reputation
4,589
Daps
63,473
well when you don't have a majority the only way you can get things done is to work with the other side and give them the vast majority of what they want in order for you to get a tiny bit of what you want. in a situation like that it's best for us that nothing happens. and even when you have a majority, the senate is pretty much designed to not do anything without 60 senators (btw the mythical democrat supermajority of 2009 existed for like a month). look at the republicans now they have a majority in the house and senate and yet obama doesn't have to veto bills every week because hardly any bills gets out of the damn place.
It doesn't matter if they barely had a supermajority. Look at how W. and the Republicans rolled. Democrats roll over because they are centrist at heart and tack to the "middle" (which is really the right wing now) as soon as they get the chance because they know their base won't punish them for it. Part of Obama's biggest opponents on the healthcare bill were Democrats with heavy pressure on them from the health insurance lobby.

Moreover, your whole "it's best that nothing happens" scenario is false. Nothing happened because of Republican intransigence, not because of Democratic reluctance. Go revisit the budget that Obama was trying to get done with Boehner.
 

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
18,227
Reputation
4,453
Daps
77,862
Reppin
The Arsenal
It doesn't matter if they barely had a supermajority. Look at how W. and the Republicans rolled. Democrats roll over because they are centrist at heart and tack to the "middle" (which is really the right wing now) as soon as they get the chance because they know their base won't punish them for it. Part of Obama's biggest opponents on the healthcare bill were Democrats with heavy pressure on them from the health insurance lobby.

Moreover, your whole "it's best that nothing happens" scenario is false. Nothing happened because of Republican intransigence, not because of Democratic reluctance. Go revisit the budget that Obama was trying to get done with Boehner.
"well when you don't have a majority the only way you can get things done is to work with the other side and give them the vast majority of what they want in order for you to get a tiny bit of what you want. in a situation like that it's best for us that nothing happens."

i prefer how the republicans behave when they don't have a majority, they chose to not participate and gum up the works. if the democrats behaved the same way when dubya was president you wouldn't be posting about how they rolled.
 

toomanydoses

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
3,174
Reputation
1,220
Daps
6,574
Reppin
Back in Florida
We'll he kept it a buck honestly we all knew that in a republican controlled Senate that conformations would be stalled at best. The sad thing is they must confirm treaties also, this isn't like little Johnny in 5th grades class election, admitting that is an abdication of the oath he took
 

MidwestD

Clyde Frog's Shooter
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
3,424
Reputation
1,086
Daps
12,192
Reppin
NULL
Mitch McTurtle (R-Turtle) is making a lot of sense here. It says right in the Constitution
that the NRA must approve of a new Supreme Court justice. Look it up, libbies. :smugdraper:
 

tmonster

Superstar
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
17,900
Reputation
3,205
Daps
31,786
To be fair, everybody already knew that the GOP wasn't going to let Obama get a justice in regardless of who he picked.

The nomination was really just a (pointless IMO) gesture by Obama meant to make the GOP look bad.
you are truly burying the lead here:dwillhuh:
 
Top