Moderator/Warning Complaints

Tom Foolery

You're using way too many napkins.
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
21,933
Reputation
6,706
Daps
92,962
Reppin
Boardwalk and Park Place
Totally disagree.

When you started your impeachment thread, you demanded no alternative points in the thread you created. This complaint is very hypocritical of you.

Also, there are legitimate grounds for trolling against you regarding topics around Sanders.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
321,045
Reputation
-34,104
Daps
629,228
Reppin
The Deep State
He creates yet another thread attacking a presidential candidate but will ban any thread criticizing Bernie Sanders and issue warning points.: The Case Against Joe Biden

HL mods just issued more warning points again for the same thing.

How do you condone this?

He's not even trying any more and he keeps getting away with it because you all don't put an end to it. These moderators are abusing their power on Higher Learning and calling out their hypocrisy is seen as a violation.

YOU CAN NOT CRITICIZE Bernie Sanders ON THE FORUM.



Screen-Shot-2019-03-18-at-4-31-38-AM.png


He did it again. How many times do I need to point this out? Proof Higher Learning moderators do NOT allow criticism of Bernie Sanders; Abuse of Power

Why does he get to keep attacking candidates and stifling any criticism?

Its bad enough I can't even post in any Sanders thread because he can't handle debate so why does he keep getting to pollute the forum attacking other political candidates?


@wire28 @Return to Forever @ezrathegreat @Jello Biafra @humble forever @Darth Nubian @Dameon Farrow @General Bravo III @BigMoneyGrip @VR Tripper @Iceson Beckford [ @BaileyPark31 @Lucky_Lefty @johnedwarduado @Armchair Militant @panopticon @88m3
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
321,045
Reputation
-34,104
Daps
629,228
Reppin
The Deep State
because it's the will of the majority that you be censored when it comes to bernie sanders :yeshrug: you aren't credible when it comes to picking presidential candidates
This doesn't make sense and you have no argument. This sounds stupid.

I support my candidates. I have problems with Sanders on several fronts. However Sanders is the only candidate protected from critique.

Mods abuse this to elevate criticism of EVERY candidate who is an actual democrat versus their BS god-emperor.
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
105,040
Reputation
13,995
Daps
305,002
Reppin
NULL
This doesn't make sense and you have no argument. This sounds stupid.

I support my candidates. I have problems with Sanders on several fronts. However Sanders is the only candidate protected from critique.

Mods abuse this to elevate criticism of EVERY candidate who is an actual democrat versus their BS god-emperor.
he's not protected, several posters criticize bernie sanders :ehh:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,457
Reputation
-574
Daps
15,342
Reppin
WestMidWest
When will mods be held accountable for their power tripping/biasness/inconsistency? Lower Learning aka Never Learning has become a constant circle jerk of apologist repeating their monthly issued talking points while pretending to be objective and seeking change...but when mods become apologist, then it's all down hill

How do I get bushed for demanding a politician address easily debunkable rumors and how is that racist?
YlKhkQK.png
dH9B1jf.png
...worst the post with proof got deleted, despite it being repost earlier in thread with no warnings/issues or replies

theColi talmbowt relationships/affairs/marriages of
Corey Booker,
Kamala Harris,
Clintons,
Whitney Houston,
Jesse Jackson,
Trump,
and random celebrities
....but now it's racist when the subject is your fav politician?
more importantly, how could the average Black person now benefit from being woke about this new form of racism, like your fav politician?
 
Top