Moral dilemma (scenario based)

[Hopeofmypeople]

You are a juror in a murder/pedo trial. The accused crimes are as follows, he raped a 9yr old boy and killed his family and then proceeded to kill the boy a week after abusing him for a week. The evidence is clear as day and DNA evidence is conclusive. The thing is the defendant is worth 50 million dollars, he has his people contact you and offer you 5 million to swing for a mistrial and the money is yours.



What do you do?

 

[MR. SNIFLES]

CONVICT HIM.

 

[The BasedFather]

Sending that fool to jail. His people can keep that 5 milly

 

[Cat piss martini]

fukk that cock sucka.
he's off to see the wizard if it's up to me.

 

[DrHackenbush]

Convict him..If he's that much of a scumbag he'd prob just have you killed rather than pay up anyway

 

[invalid]

If the boy’s family was alive, I wouldn’t budge on the decision, because they would need to receive justice.

If the boy was alive, I wouldn’t budge on the decision, because he would need to receive justice.

Since the boy and his family are both dead, there is hypothetically no one to which justice would need to be received, so the money might look appealing.

 

[MischievousMonkey]

If the boy’s family was alive, I wouldn’t budge on the decision, because they would need to receive justice.

If the boy was alive, I wouldn’t budge on the decision, because he would need to receive justice.

Since the boy and his family are both dead, there is hypothetically no one to which justice would need to be received, so the money might look appealing.

Let a pedo serial killer roam free breh

 

[Hopeofmypeople]

Convict him..If he's that much of a scumbag he'd prob just have you killed rather than pay up anyway

It’s guranteed you will be paid and no harm will come to you, the only conundrum you have to deal with is a moral one.

 

[Barlow]

5 million isn’t worth that on my conscious