Understood, but I believe what people are saying is you’re doing better than most if you’re at 100K. Like yes we know that everybody is hurting out here because of inflation, but if you’re making 100K and got money to throw to the side for retirement you’re doing great. You have millions of people out here that can’t even do that because they don’t have enough left over after paying bills and shyt. Everybody making 100k and more ain’t struggling. People in the Bay though, yes 100k ain’t shyt. I think that’s the case in D.C. too. It’s time to start posting where you live and the cost of living in these threads because a lot of us are in areas where 100k will but you in a great place so we don’t understand “100k ain’t enough money.” What you’re saying is 100% the goal though. You want to be able to do everything you need to do and still have money left to spend on other shyt.
Yes, but it's not better FOR ME. If I lose my job tomorrow, shyt will get real before black history month is over. I can't keep living in comparison to those doing better or worse, it's about my perspective and that baselines my goals. I don't want to live paycheck to paycheck in any kind of way it's defined for real. Whether it's being able to save AND pay bills or just having a little left over after bills.
I agree that location matters. I live in Baltimore, MD, but my job is HQ'd in New York. The recruiter basically told me I was "cheap" because the NY based candidates wanted WAY more
