I didn't have an issue with the post. I had an issue with the section. Another poster and I mentioned it. You removed it. I still reached out to you because the post you wrote wasn't with the flow of traffic of the hate and blood that was spewed previously before your arrival. I just wanted to get clarification and your perspective. I came to you personally so it was authentic.
Like I said I didn't get your PM. Something may have happened. That's over with and I am now giving you my attention. But yea I'll clarify. My point was that being ADOS and a Pan-Africanist are not mutually exclusive.
For example
@#1 pick look at DYNAST. Yes, he criticizes ADOS all the time and identifies more with Africa. Yet... Dynast still says he supports the ADOS movement while disagreeing with Yvette.
Why is that #1 Pick? Can you or anyone else answer that? Dynast who is among the BIGGEST Pan-Africanist on social media. That is partially what I mean. And what I also meant is that you guys who criticize the ADOS movement and try to shame them are not only wasting your time but are only making neutral Aframs/ADOS people choose sides faster. Like I said... This maybe a reality come 2050s...
Median wealth of black Americans 'will fall to zero by 2053', warns new report
Median wealth of black Americans 'will fall to zero by 2053', warns new report
You wanna disagree with those like Yvette and Tone Talks? Cool. But fact of the matter they are one of the few addressing this coming
apocalypse. Forget DUMBASSSES like Tariq... Focus on the "data" Yvette posts. And you know whats crazy? I like Dynast don't even agree 100% with what Yvette and Tone Talks say. Because they don't understand non-ADOS politics at all(its true). But the thing is the ADOS critics also don't understand what ADOS
wants. People like me are unique because I can understand both sides. I can act as a translator. That is what I really mean.
So all in all what are you going to do about ADOS if you view them as a bunch of "c00ns"? Are you going to write articles about them and why they should not be trusted? What? Because otherwise you are not doing much.
When you came back and made that post on me, I had to defend myself. Simple as that.
And which post was that?
I obvious what I want to do. I want to be a mod. Temp or not. I want to clean this site up. I ain't putting up with the bullshyt. No matter if it's a nikka I like who I fukk with or a nikka who I think is dumb as fukk like Somori, I will give them the same respect and treatment but I ain't putting up with shyt.
Cool. Voice your reasons to
@Brooklynzson
This anti-Black shyt ends on my watch. BET!
And what anti-Black shyt is that? If people want to put their ethnicity first then whats the issue?
That doesn't mean ados ends. Not at all.
@Old Scott Hall, houston and
@Alexander are ados. They got some good nikkas. We just need balance which we don't have.
Okay so you admit that there are good ADOS posters especially those like
@Old Scott Hall who is a bigger supporter than myself. If you are aware of that then why generalize all ADOS posters as c00ns? The ADOS posters aren't even monolithic in political views. Some love Africa(me,
@Samori Toure, etc), some can give a shyt about Africa, some are more about Black male protection(
@Supper), some are feminist, some are for gay rights, some are actually REAL c00ns and are just using the ADOS movement to shyt on other Blacks, some are just flat out trolls, some are straight up black empowerment, etc, etc, etc. The only unifying thing is reparations.
Listen
@#1 pick I don't know WHAT your goal with ADOS is but if they are not trying to sabotage an African country or get in the way of Black economic power then I don't know what the big deal is? Until I see ADOS actually attacking Black immigrants like South Africans then I'll understand.