Fair enough. The same standard should apply to anyone using their own moral compass to affect other people's lives, right?
More hypocisy from Christians when it comes to leviticus
- Thread starter hayesc0
- Start date
Please post an example.
Well Seattle city council passed an ordinance that makes for gender neutral bathrooms because it believes that it is prejudicial in nature to persons who don't identify visually as a gender to have M and W bathrooms. That is a moral stance that many may not agree with.
Why are some sources of belief acceptable, but others are not? If I get my beliefs and moral compass from Bearinstein bears books, or the Tao of Steve, or my chemistry and physics classes or from the book of Romans, why is one a worse choice than others?
What does this have to do with a morality this sounds more like an example of a right.
Believing that something is a right begins in what they believe morally. As in, morally slavery is wrong and individuals should have freedom.
Not sure I agree with this they can correspond but that is not always the case.
Do you realise you live in a secular country?
What? That rule only applies to single occupant restrooms. How is that morally bankrupt???
Ya know,
I know where this is going and I'm just gonna take a knee. This is already like 4 on 1 and its too early for a flame war which is already developing
My only point was that saying that Christians don't follow their word correctly is moot if you think the word they choose to follow is a ghost story.
Regarding using a religious belief to apply to law, was not my point whatsoever and I actually agreed (even in reply) to big blues original reply.
I know where this is going and I'm just gonna take a knee. This is already like 4 on 1 and its too early for a flame war which is already developing
My only point was that saying that Christians don't follow their word correctly is moot if you think the word they choose to follow is a ghost story.
Regarding using a religious belief to apply to law, was not my point whatsoever and I actually agreed (even in reply) to big blues original reply.
Bilz
Superstar
The Berenstain Bears would be a much better choice than the bible IMO, but any book that is being used by a significant group of people as a guide to influence the law of the land is going to be questioned.
Pick one of the worst examples of crap to represent Christians( Roberts) and cut and paste from a another example of crap( TYT) to make a thread about it.
:zfg:
Ok if its crap explain why.