"Most white people are part Neaderthal" - Joe Rogan

[Type Username Here]

what makes you think neanderthals were extra savage? we're the ones who wiped them out (or otherwise outlived them)

Exactly. There is 2-3% DNA at the most. That means Homo Sapiens dominated Neanderthals.

Besides, the image of the savage neanderthal has been debunked by anthropologists for a decade now.

Neanderthal behavior - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

They choose to ignore that part of science that conflicts with their agenda and I know why they do it.

It makes them sleep better at night if they can attribute their people being enslaved solely on savagery because admitting the alternative and realistic reasons would conflict with their false sense of superiority.

 

[Hawaiian Punch]

what makes you think neanderthals were extra savage? we homo sapiens are the ones who wiped them out (or otherwise outlived them)

Well it's speculated humans outlived them. Plus they were known to practice cannibalism, were apex predators, stronger than humans and built homes out of the bones of wooly fukking mammoths. So yea that makes me think they were extra savage

 

[Gravity]

Exactly. There is 2-3% DNA at the most. That means Homo Sapiens dominated Neanderthals.

Besides, the image of the savage neanderthal has been debunked by anthropologists for a decade now.

Neanderthal behavior - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

They choose to ignore that part of science that conflicts with their agenda and I know why they do it.

It makes them sleep better at night if they can attribute their people being enslaved solely on savagery because admitting the alternative and realistic reasons would conflict with their false sense of superiority.

Yea, because black people are the ones with the superiority/inferiority complex. It is what it is, white people are the most savage, violent people to ever walk the earth and thats based on history. Whether its because you are still part Neanderthal or not doesn't change that.

 

[zerozero]

Well it's speculated humans outlived them. Plus they were known to practice cannibalism, were apex predators, stronger than humans and built homes out of the bones of wooly fukking mammoths. So yea that makes me think they were extra savage

we've practiced cannibalism for a long time too breh. And we've gone beyond apex predator to apex everything in the ecosystem. Muscular strength doesn't mean savagery ... elephants are much stronger than us, are they more vicious?

Basically a lot of white racists have called black folk underevolved, you want to call white folk underevolved, in both cases there's a double fallacy going on;

a) comparing cultures and deciding the one you prefer is more 'advanced' in a time period sense, rather than just different

b) attributing mores in social behavior to biological determinism

this type of thought combines basic mistakes in anthropology and biology. I shall not stand for this anti neanderthal bigotry. lol

 

[Type Username Here]

we've practiced cannibalism for a long time too breh. And we've gone beyond apex predator to apex everything in the ecosystem. Muscular strength doesn't mean savagery ... elephants are much stronger than us, are they more vicious?

Basically a lot of white racists have called black folk underevolved, you want to call white folk underevolved, in both cases there's a double fallacy going on;

a) comparing cultures and deciding the one you prefer is more 'advanced' in a time period sense, rather than just different

b) attributing mores in social behavior to biological determinism

this type of thought combines basic mistakes in anthropology and biology. I shall not stand for this anti neanderthal bigotry. lol

They are just racists that are accepted here because of the large amount of blacks that post here. Claiming one race is superior or inferior based on genes is racism, and that is exactly what is going on in here.

The Europeans were just superior in the matters of military tactics and organization. They had thousands of years of inter-European large scale battles to perfect military movements and structure. They had better technology, weapons, and chain-of-command. They were already immune to various diseases and mastered the ways of troop supplies. MOST importantly, the middle-aged European was under the dumbass impression that their behavior was mandated by God himself. They felt they were doing the lord's work by enslaving and "civilizing" and mass conversions.

The fact that these racist also ignore inter-tribe violence and savagery in the Americas and Africa pre-European involvement just furthers add to the evidence that they have an agenda.

 

[Gravity]

Crackas are always trying to justify their wickedness. "We were just more advanced uh uh uh we were doing what God told us uh uh uh they were warring in Africa before we came". It's the same old "We aren't evil we are just superior" nonsense that makes them be able to sleep at night.

 

[Hawaiian Punch]

The Europeans were just superior in the matters of military tactics and organization. They had thousands of years of inter-European large scale battles to perfect military movements and structure. They had better technology, weapons, and chain-of-command. They were already immune to various diseases and mastered the ways of troop supplies. MOST importantly, the middle-aged European was under the dumbass impression that their behavior was mandated by God himself. They felt they were doing the lord's work by enslaving and "civilizing" and mass conversions.

Exactly. Look for the record I'm not claiming blacks are superior. I am just trying to pinpoint the superior level of savagery that we have seen from caucasoids throughout history. Let's get this straight now I do acknowledge every culture has had wars, minor forms of slavery and human sacrifice. But how many cultures had these things

And these
Most Painful 20 Torture Devices in the History… « Reading Shouts

Point is Europeans were awesome in the level of savagery they displayed. Is there no surprise they gave rise to monsters like hitler and Napoleon? That world wars have occurred on their soil? That natives throughout the world have been wiped out? No this is not racism breh. Im pointing out the obvious

 

[OsO]

if i remember correctly, i believe the report said that ALL NON NATIVE AFRICANS contain part neanderthal dna, not just so called "white" people.

 

[VerbalIntercourse]

if i remember correctly, i believe the report said that ALL NON NATIVE AFRICANS contain part neanderthal dna, not just so called "white" people.

Exactly, and native americans have the most neanderthal genes.

My wife (han chinese) has more neanderthal genes than the average european. She also has MtDNA D4e, which means she comes from the extreme north, and many natives americans are her distant cousins.

My dad has an australiod MtDNA (m) and those robust features are clearly visible in my paternal grandma and myself.

 

[Tom Foolery]

I have a feeling this guys a closet racist.

 

[Angel On The Rag]

white people stay

 

[daze23]

"extra savage" is a pretty stupid thing to say. what does that even mean?

anyway, this is old news. just like every other time it came up, I'll point out that Neanderthals came from Africa

 

[Takerstani]

According to a DNA ancestry test, I'm 1.1% Neanderthal from the cac blood (mostly Irish and English). I think it was like the 90ths percentile for West African members, the average for us being .5%.

 

[Mr. Pink]

Exactly. Look for the record I'm not claiming blacks are superior. I am just trying to pinpoint the superior level of savagery that we have seen from caucasoids throughout history. Let's get this straight now I do acknowledge every culture has had wars, minor forms of slavery and human sacrifice. But how many cultures had these things

And these
Most Painful 20 Torture Devices in the History… « Reading Shouts

Point is Europeans were awesome in the level of savagery they displayed. Is there no surprise they gave rise to monsters like hitler and Napoleon? That world wars have occurred on their soil? That natives throughout the world have been wiped out? No this is not racism breh. Im pointing out the obvious

Isn't it a bit ironic that you would condemn Hitler in the same post in which you support the belief that a certain group is prone to savagery because of their genes?

If the Neanderthal gene accounts for the European savagery then what gene accounts for the European intelligence and creativity, for all the good things they've offered the world? If the Neanderthal gene is responsible for the likes of Hitler, what gene is responsible for Leonardo DaVinci?

Nah dude, genes have nothing to do with it. The potential for savagery and hatred is universal, just like the potential for intelligence and compassion. The reason the Europeans are responsible for the bulk of fukked up shyt in the world(and as an European I'm not disputing this) is the same reason they are responsible for the bulk of good shyt in the world: they are/were in the 'driver's seat' for a long time. That's all. Their actions, good or bad, have a greater impact and echo further because of their power. I'm sure over the course of history there have been many potential Hitlers in every race. As we speak there's probably some African warlord brainwashing children into killing machines. What sepparates him from Hitler is the fact that Hitler was in the position and had the power that allowed him to commit his atrocities on a much larger scale.

 

[Gravity]

Isn't it a bit ironic that you would condemn Hitler in the same post in which you support the belief that a certain group is prone to savagery because of their genes?

If the Neanderthal gene accounts for the European savagery then what gene accounts for the European intelligence and creativity, for all the good things they've offered the world? If the Neanderthal gene is responsible for the likes of Hitler, what gene is responsible for Leonardo DaVinci?

Nah dude, genes have nothing to do with it. The potential for savagery and hatred is universal, just like the potential for intelligence and compassion. The reason the Europeans are responsible for the bulk of fukked up shyt in the world(and as an European I'm not disputing this) is the same reason they are responsible for the bulk of good shyt in the world: they are/were in the 'driver's seat' for a long time. That's all. Their actions, good or bad, have a greater impact and echo further because of their power. I'm sure over the course of history there have been many potential Hitlers in every race. As we speak there's probably some African warlord brainwashing children into killing machines. What sepparates him from Hitler is the fact that Hitler was in the position and had the power that allowed him to commit his atrocities on a much larger scale.

Please expand on your claim that Europeans are responsible for the the "bulk of good shyt in the world"? Your post is a perfect example of my previous post.