"Most white people are part Neaderthal" - Joe Rogan

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
32,535
Reputation
2,745
Daps
45,204
there a phenomena that plays into a lot of what we talk about. that is the fact that we only know about history that was recorded
 

Mr. Pink

All Star
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
3,050
Reputation
-435
Daps
5,948
Please expand on your claim that Europeans are responsible for the the "bulk of good shyt in the world"?
Does my 'claim' really need expanding? Doesn't the majority of technological and scientific progress come from Europe? What about culture and education?
What about social progress? Democracy traces its roots to the Greek city-states. The notion of fundamental human rights can be traced to Rennaisance Europe(in fact a lot of good things came from the Rennaisance period). Wasn't the father of medicine an European?

Your post is a perfect example of my previous post.
How so? I didn't claim Europeans are inherently superior to other races.
 

bouncy

Banned
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
5,153
Reputation
1,099
Daps
7,065
Reppin
NULL
This has been known since the 80's with Michael Bradley talking about this and being threatened to not talk about it in public because it brings up a lot of stuff that the powers that be doesn't want to be known such as religion, superiority, and mental disorders as well as the concept of time that we are all under in our minds. It all stems from the Neanderthals and their distorted view of the world and having to be on top like principality of zero. They are the reason why we are at war because the true reason is about the two groups of these neanderthal family ("Jews" and Arabs) are fighting to control the world with their view of it and force others to believe it.

If you get a chance read the whole website and prepare to view the world in a totally different light. Also, take into account he was talking about this when people would laugh at you for saying these things.

Iceman Inheritance, Holy Grail and Appropriate Technology

"Science, May 6, 2010 vindicates The Iceman Inheritance and Chosen People from the Caucasus, but beware of that "one to four percent" statistical spin.


The May 6, 2010 issue of Science, Journal of the American Academy of Sciences, has finally confirmed that modern human populations have significant Neanderthal genetic admixture. This study by the Max Planck Institute of Leipzig under the overall leadership of Dr. Svante Paabo also included some researchers from the Harvard University School of Medicine.

Behind the scenes, it seems that this DNA study's dramatic reversal of the Paabo-Stoneking Cell article of July 15, 1997 insisting that there was no Neanderthal DNA in modern humans was due to the fact that Harvard researchers, notably geneticist Dr. David Reich, came up with data that contradicted the 1997 study by Svante Paabo (then at the University of Munich) and Mike Stoneking (then at the University of Pennsylvania). "

"The 1997 Paabo-Stoneking study published in the July issue of Cell was highly promoted in North American media, contradicted Trinkaus, prevented Random House from issuing a cheaper mass-market paperback edition of The Neandertals in the Fall of 1997 and immediately enthroned Svante Paabo, in the public mind, instead of Erik Trinkaus as the world's leading expert on Neanderthals. Naturally, the 1997 Paabo-Stoneking Cell article also discredited my own books The Iceman Inheritance (1978) and Chosen People from the Caucasus (1992) because I had concluded exactly what Trinkaus had concluded, only I had said it fourteen years earlier. This new May 2010 study concedes that from "1 to 4" percent of modern human DNA is Neanderthal. However, I see and smell a little loophole just large enough for a statistical rat.

The conclusions of this new 2010 study, certainly vetted and possibly written by Paabo, are clearly intended to convey the impression that this "1 to 4 percent" of lingering Neanderthal DNA is more or less evenly distributed throughout the world except for Africa where there is supposedly no Neanderthal DNA -- and I find this hard to believe.

The May 2010 study even found Neanderthal DNA in New Guinea, which is highly unlikely and I wonder who the carefully chosen modern donor was to get this supposed Neanderthal DNA. I like to joke that the DNA donor was probably the fictional (I hope) Dr. Jacob Epstein, formerly a New York doctor who now practices in Port Moresby.

This same fictional Dr. Jacob Epstein was possibly also the discoverer of the very real and too-conveniently identified DRD4 7R gene, the Neanderthal gene responsible for "civilization and progress" as we know them. However, this gene's discovery is more usually attributed, not to my fictional Dr. Jacob Epstein, but to the Yale University School of Medicine, (see Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, January 4, 2001). This is the gene associated with "Attention Deficit Hyper-Active Disorder". So, do we really want to know Neanderthal-inspired "civilization" and "progress" in their present forms? See The Huffington Post "Surprising Way Your Neanderthal Genes May Affect You" by Garret LoPorto.

Personally, I sincerely hope that Garret LoPorto did not bite off his tongue while he was writing his article for The Huffington Post because his tongue was obviously and very firmly in his cheek when he was typing it. Garret LoPorto reveals that "modern" man had been around for 163,000 years but didn't do anything until infected with the Neanderthal DRD4 7R gene for progress (or Attention Deficit Disorder). Actually, Neanderthal-impelled "progress" and "civilization" do rather seem to be characterized by a deficit of attention toward the environment and human needs and by hyper activity to make money at any cost to western society.

With good maps and atlases there is a way of looking at this "1 to 4 percent" of Neanderthal DNA in modern humans that makes a great deal of historical sense. What if this Neanderthal DNA is concentrated in the Caucasus Middle East, where this 2010 study admits that Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons (or "Early Modern Humans") met and interbred? Surely it is reasonable to suppose that the main concentration of the world's surviving Neanderthal DNA must be in this area, discounting very modern migrations of some people by railway, steamship and aircraft transportation, and that Neanderthal DNA decreases rapidly as distance from the Caucasus centre of interbreeding increases?

There would be virtually no Neanderthal DNA in Atlantic Western Europe, but there would be more in Central Europe and much more in Eastern Europe, and especially in mountainous areas. There would be virtually none northward toward the Baltic Sea and virtually none east of Kazakhstan to Pacific Far East Asia. And we were already told that there is supposedly no Neanderthal DNA in Africa. But actually there should be at least some Neanderthal DNA in North Africa because the Arab-Muslims conquered it. Now, this sort of Neanderthal DNA distribution might average out to that insignificant "1 to 4 percent of Neanderthal DNA in the whole world's population." See? As Mark Twain put it: first come lies, then damn lies and then statistics.

However, on August 27, 2011, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), quoting a spokesman from Harvard, stated that the now-accepted level of Neanderthal DNA in modern living humanity is closer to six percent instead of "from 1 to 4 percent". We're gradually edging toward the objective truth since that first dramatic May 6, 2010 concession in Science, and the new estimate of "six percent" very comfortably accommodates the population of both the Caucasus Middle East and Islamic western and Central Asia.

Now, assuming this sort of concentration of Neanderthal DNA in the Caucasus Middle East, that "1 to 4" percent (or, now, six percent) of world population suddenly becomes very significant indeed. It means that the Semitic peoples of the Middle East -- Jews, Arabs and others (like Armenians) -- must, therefore, be substantially Neanderthal. "
 

bouncy

Banned
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
5,153
Reputation
1,099
Daps
7,065
Reppin
NULL
Exactly, and native americans have the most neanderthal genes.

My wife (han chinese) has more neanderthal genes than the average european. She also has MtDNA D4e, which means she comes from the extreme north, and many natives americans are her distant cousins.

My dad has an australiod MtDNA (m) and those robust features are clearly visible in my paternal grandma and myself.


You're bragging like that is a good thing. Once you learn what that means I doubt you will be talking about it so proudly but watch you argue with me for saying this.

Anyway you still have black in you so don't :deadrose:. Everything is going to be alright even though you are trying to wash that blackness out. It ain't going nowhere buddy. HAHA :umad: .

To the people who have these genes as long as you are real with yourself and willing to be good people and not flex some fake ass superiority(due to low self esteem) and willing to hear the truth and act on it like Michael Bradley I still will give you love. This is about spreading knowledge about the truth of the world and why we are in the bullshyt we are in because the world is fukked up from the way we think to the wars and people getting killed daily for NOTHING but this superiority bullshyt. Religion is just the front for the claim of racial superiority. Study major religions, then white superiority, and you will see a connection. Blacks and other races don't think it doesn't effect you because when you have this mind state it has you looking at the world in these people's eyes and it is BACKWARDS and not healthy way to think. You see how it has fukked up principaltiy of zero's mind. He can't even have a descent conversation without trying to prove some racial bullshyt and this stems from this distorted view of the world he has been attracted to due to his upbringing BUT that is his choice because just like he chose this fukked up thinking he could have gone the Michael Bradley route and see the truth for what it is.

I don't hate Principality of Zero but I know he is dangerous because his lack of understanding breeds hate with people like him and prevents peace in the world which means another lifetime of some bullshyt instead of enjoying the world and what it has to offer.
 

Pika-Jew

Rookie
Joined
Jul 27, 2012
Messages
15
Reputation
0
Daps
5
Reppin
NULL
This is kind of a racist thing to say. It adds to the negativism in the world.
 

Angel On The Rag

I'm bloody hungry!!
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
4,443
Reputation
-141
Daps
1,069
Reppin
Tampax Warehouse
:russ: @ some dummy in here talking about Neanderthal's practiced cannibalism like Africans aint? Africans eat the hearts of their enemies after killing them in battle in certain parts of the continent
 

Sensitive Blake Griffin

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,123
Reputation
2,601
Daps
67,719
all non africans have neanderthal dna. My wife has one if the highest neanderthal scores on 23andme.

I have 1% neanderthal dna. But i also have many denisovan genes, which were another archaic human species.
Words cannot describe how truly strange you are. And get the fukk out of here, you ain't got no wife you fukking weirdo
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,816
Reputation
2,170
Daps
56,251
Does my 'claim' really need expanding? Doesn't the majority of technological and scientific progress come from Europe? What about culture and education?
No. Life began in Africa, so that means that science, technology, and education also began in Africa. You're thinking in the socalled modern sense of those terms but without science, technology, and education man doesn't make it out of Africa to the land called Europe.

What about social progress? Democracy traces its roots to the Greek city-states. The notion of fundamental human rights can be traced to Rennaisance Europe(in fact a lot of good things came from the Rennaisance period). Wasn't the father of medicine an European?
Yes, Hippocrates the "father of medicine" who studied in Kemet and learned from things that Imhotep did and discovered 2-3k years earlier.

Social progress? For who, the white man and who else? The current concept of "race" and "racism" originated in Europe. So obviously democracy and the idea of human rights don't outweigh the atrocities associated with racism/white supremacy. They only had white men in mind when they created democracy and human rights. Everybody else had to fight the white man to be included. The reason I said that your post is an example of what I said earlier is because you're trying to justify all the wickedness that whites are responsible for by acting as if the socalled good things they're responsible for balances it out. No, it doesn't balance out. Whites haven't done evil shyt because they just do happen to be in the "driver's seat", they're in the driver's seat because they've done evil shyt.
 
Top