I actually don't think that there should be as many black people in commercials pushing products for white corporations as their are. I think that this is done purposely/strategically to help maintain the status quo which is black inferiority. Now this is another discussion, you're just deflecting.Black people are only 12% of the population, with your reasoning we shouldn't seen anywhere near the amount of Black people we see in commercials.
and to be honest, Black kids should understand that there are Black people that exist that dress like women and behave like women. They don't have to watch it on television, as these people live in their communities, it's already 'normal' to some extent which is probably for the best because people that are considered abnormal in Black communities are sometimes violently attacked because of it.
I want people to notice how you first defended the agenda in the bold paragraph then deflected from the agenda in the italics.If men are in their sons lives and raise give them an example of what they should strive to be, the possible effects of any 'agenda' would be nullified, the problem is that men are abandoning their responsibilities as fathers and leaving their sons vulnerable for all kinds of 'agendas'.
Your defense in bold is bullshyt because the promotion of flamboyantly homosexual black men in the media isn't about education or awareness, it's about entertainment and pushing an agenda. Like you said, we already know that these people exist so we don't need to see them glamorized in the media to be made aware. That just doesn't fly. Nobody is condoning violence but we're saying that the promotion and normalization of that lifestyle is counterproductive to the community. You're saying that it's for the best.
As far as your deflection it was
