And mufukkaz are gonna support MS after this kind of shyt.... pathetic.
Would i buy them? Not most.
But if they are free? Why the fukk not?
*turns on PS4 via remote play on PS4*
*plays indie games*
![]()

Would i buy them? Not most.
But if they are free? Why the fukk not?
*turns on PS4 via remote play on PS4*
*plays indie games*
![]()
Free dont mean always good![]()

Considering the games we've been getting on the PS3 with PS Plus, I think we'll be ok.
![]()
Forget all the DRM and used game stuff, why should I pay $100 more for a less powerful system? The gap between them is only going to get more apparent when Naughty Dog & Santa Monica starts cranking out games. I may get a One, but it damn sure won't be before I get a PS4.
The performance edge is pretty substantial.
and the things that kinect can do is far beyond what the ps4 camera can pull off.


Difference is u had a choice in whether u wanted to buy that gimmick ass shyt...now they charging u for mandatory product whether u want the shyt or not...let alone the fact that its invasive as fukk this go round...fukk em..and u should be sayin the same thing...cause they apparently have ZERO problem sayin it to u...especially if u ain't got no Internet connection..oh boy. how much was the kinect last go round? $100+, guess what comes with the box now? a suped up version of the kinect.
so yes, you're buying the box for $399, kinect 2.0 for $100.
do the math friend.
and the things that kinect can do is far beyond what the ps4 camera can pull off.


![]()
Shamelessly stolen from neofags.
They are saying that this interview wasn't even supposed to air....![]()


![]()
Shamelessly stolen from neofags.
They are saying that this interview wasn't even supposed to air....![]()


MS and Viacom trying to pull it from all over the web, even youtube.
They must've forgotten the first rule of the internet....once on the net always on the net....![]()
