Mulan has netted $260 million so far on Disney +

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
67,794
Reputation
14,299
Daps
423,923
Reppin
CHICAGO
I think what studios will get from this is people dont go to the movies, just to see the movie. They also go for the experience. The journey. The planning of going out.

Streaming cant beat that, unless it's a TV show.
NO shyt

EVERYBODY INCLUDING STUDIOS
ALREADY KNOW THIS.

THESE ARE JUST UNPRECEDENTED TIMES.
:devil:
:evil:
 

Mortal1

Superstar
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Messages
13,285
Reputation
3,372
Daps
42,842
Reppin
The Bay Area
Let's put it this way.. because the upcoming schedule is so packed, I could definitely see Disney+ trying this again with another title, maybe at a different price point but I'm skeptical that they would actually put up another tentpole.

There's no chance in hell that if those above estimates are true they will risk putting Black Widow up on the service. I think movie theaters are going to live on and still be by far the most profitable way to release a movie.
I keep hearing that Pixar's Soul is the next movie they want to release on Plus but will it be the premiere access or just a straight release like they did with Onward?
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
66,903
Reputation
17,310
Daps
275,991
Reppin
Oakland
Let's put it this way.. because the upcoming schedule is so packed, I could definitely see Disney+ trying this again with another title, maybe at a different price point but I'm skeptical that they would actually put up another tentpole.

There's no chance in hell that if those above estimates are true they will risk putting Black Widow up on the service. I think movie theaters are going to live on and still be by far the most profitable way to release a movie.
ehh, if anything, this is further eliminating yet another category of movies that are considered theater events. kids/family movies as VOD makes sense for the target consumer, they're paying less to entertain the whole family, and kids don't care if it's on the 60" at home or 20ft at the theater, they just want to watch. going forward, it's looking like action/hero/sci-fi flicks are the only things that will draw people to the theater. dramas don't, comedies no longer do, horror, thrillers, indie/niche films - nope nope nope. family movies were the only other category that put up numbers consistently. if they want to up the numbers, they simply need to release these for VOD on agnostic platforms like prime, apple tv, cable providers on demand ordering, etc as opposed to just their app
 

Ethnic Vagina Finder

The Great Paper Chaser
Bushed
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
57,059
Reputation
2,418
Daps
161,426
Reppin
North Jersey but I miss Cali :sadcam:
NO shyt

EVERYBODY INCLUDING STUDIOS
ALREADY KNOW THIS.

THESE ARE JUST UNPRECEDENTED TIMES.
:devil:
:evil:

But the thought of VOD crossed their minds. The difference in being able to keep profits that normally go to theaters, and the subscription bump sounds appealing.

But at the end of the day, you cant beat the one and done in person model. Or the multiple views.

But the uncharted territory pushed them to at least try.


Low budget flicks might go the streaming or at least get streamed sooner than normal runs.
 

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
18,144
Reputation
3,382
Daps
83,277
Reppin
NULL
But but nobody’s going to pay $30.00

Maybe y’all broke nikkas cant :umad:

Still can’t believe nikkas were upset over Mulan. Of all movies to be mad about. I didn’t know nikkas in the hood were checking for Mulan like that :mjlol:
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
202,232
Reputation
28,065
Daps
647,155
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
ehh, if anything, this is further eliminating yet another category of movies that are considered theater events. kids/family movies as VOD makes sense for the target consumer, they're paying less to entertain the whole family, and kids don't care if it's on the 60" at home or 20ft at the theater, they just want to watch. going forward, it's looking like action/hero/sci-fi flicks are the only things that will draw people to the theater. dramas don't, comedies no longer do, horror, thrillers, indie/niche films - nope nope nope. family movies were the only other category that put up numbers consistently. if they want to up the numbers, they simply need to release these for VOD on agnostic platforms like prime, apple tv, cable providers on demand ordering, etc as opposed to just their app

There will have to be changes made.. I'm not seeing anything in these numbers that indicates they are going to profit more from the Disney+ release than they would have in theaters. Mulan likely would have done $800M+ worldwide which they would get around 55% of the global cut - production/advertising I think you are looking at a couple hundred million in profit and then would have made more in rentals/sales/sign-ups afterwards.
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
66,903
Reputation
17,310
Daps
275,991
Reppin
Oakland
There will have to be changes made.. I'm not seeing anything in these numbers that indicates they are going to profit more from the Disney+ release than they would have in theaters. Mulan likely would have done $800M+ worldwide which they would get around 55% of the global cut - production/advertising I think you are looking at a couple hundred million in profit and then would have made more in rentals/sales/sign-ups afterwards.
I’m not saying they will profit more going this route, especially if it’s exclusive to Disney, but if there is an appetite for these releases from consumers since its a better deal, they may take a hybrid approach by releasing in theaters exclusively for a few weeks then on demand. If families are just as happy to watch at home, that’s another genre of movies that won’t be doing numbers for theaters. The same thing happened to horror and comedies - people are happy to watch at home vs the theater. Theaters were struggling before this, and I see this VOD experiment as accelerating their demise
 

humminbird

Veteran
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
45,035
Reputation
9,516
Daps
185,900
Ok it failed
They know $30 is too expensive
Make it $20 and do it to a better movie this time
 

calh45

Cal
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
12,227
Reputation
2,290
Daps
42,734
Flopped in the theaters and didn’t make a big enough splash on Disney+ to break even. :francis:
The Failure of "Mulan" Is More Bad News for Hollywood

DAMN. Tenet got $250 million worldwide??

They're for damn sure also gonna recoup a bunch of money when they release it VOD because I'm definitely watching that one.

On topic, it's hilarious that they purposely let the fake numbers roll for a solid week for PR before correcting it.
 
Top