When did your wake up call happen for crackas not to accept you as one of them? It's okay tell me what happened.
Mulattos are Black
- Thread starter BLΔCK⁂W⊙LF
- Start date
Bunchy Carter
I'll Take The Money Over The Honey
Yet they're more potent than OG SaiyansNo we not. We just have the ability to tap into Black flavor and culture cuz it's part of us. It's like Dragonball with the half Saiyan's, they could go Super Saiyan too but they not as battle hardened as the og Saiyan's
How are you going to say no they're mixed and force them to say they're mixed yet say no more fence sitting?
Is identifying as both when your native culture deems you black socially not fence-sitting?
And they identified by tribe/nation/kingdom.
And you would still be identifiable by a much larger group. Unless you're talking a
Huh? This makes no sense people still to this day do that.Yet they're more potent than OG Saiyans
How are you going to say no they're mixed and force them to say they're mixed yet say no more fence sitting?
Is identifying as both when your native culture deems you black socially not fence-sitting?
And they identified by tribe/nation/kingdom.
QUOTE="Gbedoughboi, post: 27424017, member: 28294"]read my post again, i dont think you understood it[/QUOTE]
And you would still be identifiable by a much larger group. Unless you're talking about American slavery but that's a whole different situation so it wouldn't make much sense in the first.
And you would still be identifiable by a much larger group. Unless you're talking about American slavery but that's a whole different situation so it wouldn't make much sense in the first.[/QUOTE]
It does make sense simply because the concept of what is black, what is white, what is Asian didn't really exist back then. This is like trying to apply our standard of accessibility to information today towards people at the dawn 20th century.
If an Ottoman man ended up in China and had a son by Chinese woman, the son would identify with whatever land/culture he was raised in. Not "I'm half Middle Eastern, half East Asian", which are terms we currently use.
Black back then was used as a physical description but not as a cultural identity to compliment what we believe is a prototypical phenotype of what a black person looks like. Same as a person being described as white-skinned, but ask what they are and they'll say "I'm a Viking", not "I'm a white man". Being a certain race now has cultural connotations that didn't exist back then.
Last edited:
CarbonBraddock
You will be trolled
I kind of stood on the sidelines regarding the topic of whether biracial people were Black, and I have now decided to choose the side of them being Black.
For a person that has a White mom/dad and a Black parent to say they are "biracial" is an exemplification of their confusion.
It shows a lack of understanding of White supremacy and your place in a White nation.
Most of us Blacks that have mixed ancestry don't even acknowledge it simply due to the fact that we being some percentage White doesn't negate the abuses we'll endure in this Western system.
Saying "I'm mixed" disrespects where we came from, and does not acknowledge our ancestors and our current-day struggles. Being Black is an experience more than it is just being DNA/genetics.
If I were to say, "I want to acknowledge my White side as much as my Black side", I'd be a damn fool. Whites don't even acknowledge my Black side's rights nor its humanity, and couldn't care less about me being some percentage White. So what logical sense does it make for me to say, "I'm mixed/biracial"?
Your thoughts?
my thoughts are you're a retard
could you elaborate
i don't get what you are saying
A foreign exchange from Vietnam sees doppelgangers of;
Jordan Peele
Chris Brown
Rihanna
Zazie Beets
Halle Berry
J. Cole
Beyonce
Laz Alonso
Omari Hardwick
Stacey Dash
Alicia Keys
Joe Budden
Russell Wilson
How are they distinguishing the "full black" light skinned Blacks from the mixed Blacks?
Its not their business to distinguish shyt. Who are they anyway? And neither is it mine to try tell apart a Korean from a vietnamese.
But if they insist, a simple question will suffice..a lot of people are allowed to make declarations, with their background story not checked. If you ask someone what they are, they could merely just say Black. But if you ask what their parents are youd find one is Black and one is White. You need not ask any further at that point, no need arguing with a confused person.
It's not about it being their business. The point is, walking down the street, you cannot tell the difference. So what is the use in shunning people if you can't quite tell if they're "one of us" or not? WE know who's what because those are all public figures but even then some of these people haven't been mistaken before by us on this very board.
Are you and every like-minded Black person going to go around asking every light skinned person you see or one who acts too "new" for you what their parents are? If not, going out of your way to exclude biracial Black people who you only know about through entertainment and extend it to average people you'll never converse in depth with serves no purpose.
Youre missing the point. Black folks dont need to carry the extra weight and burden of half castes, why? how is it our responsibility and not that of cacs with their vast resources?It reduces and diminishes Black identity once half cacs are treated as one with Blacks. Its just common sense.
I'm missing the point yet this your first post addressing "weight and burden" so your point wasn't made. No it isn't common sense
Weight and burden of half-castes
This is the type of shyt that has "half-castes" running with whites and "breeding out". And this same board swears we need more strength in numbers.I'm figuring out that this board is afraid of the AA ethnicity dying out which may be a legitimate concern but if everyone took on the mentality to exclude biracial and therefore push them towards white social circles that will only perpetuate the idea that all biracial procreate with whites and accelerate the loss of the African-American.
It does make sense simply because the concept of what is black, what is white, what is Asian didn't really exist back then. This is like trying to apply our standard of accessibility to information today towards people at the dawn 20th century.
If an Ottoman man ended up in China and had a son by Chinese woman, the son would identify with whatever land/culture he was raised in. Not "I'm half Middle Eastern, half East Asian", which are terms we currently use.
Black back then was used as a physical description but not as a cultural identity to compliment what we believe is a prototypical phenotype of what a black person looks like. Same as a person being described as white-skinned, but ask what they are and they'll say "I'm a Viking", not "I'm a white man". Being a certain race now has cultural connotations that didn't exist back then.[/QUOTE]
What? Culture still has nothing to with race. One race predominantyl belonging to on culture doesn't mean following that culture automatically tags you with that race. That is backwards logic.