No. He was a UK Born citizen. Not a Libyan.
Muslim Travel Ban Thread (6/26: SCOTUS voted 5-4 to uphold the administration’s ban)
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
Umm his parentsNo. He was a UK Born citizen. Not a Libyan.
implying Americans dont notice foreign events? WOW
nikka Manchester would have still happened if the travel ban passed the first time.
US laws don't cover the UK, take a Political Science class Uncle Faux-tep :cambybp:
Even if the UK passed a similar law in January it wouldn't have prevented it. :denzelcmonson:
you never know they may have never came...or better background checks would have prevented his father from even making it to the UK.... he was arrested as well remember?nikka Manchester would have still happened if the travel ban passed the first time.
US laws don't cover the UK, take a Political Science class Uncle Faux-tep :cambybp:
Even if the UK passed a similar law in January it wouldn't have prevented it. :denzelcmonson:
how slow are you that people can use manchester as an example to ufettered immigration
I ask that question every time I see you post. :denzelcmonson:
Although the SC leans conservative now.
I would be surprised if they overturned it.
I would be surprised if they overturned it.
fukking ignorant moronsThe weird thing about the second travel ban is that under a different president, it would be much easier to uphold without Trump's dumbass tweets. According to one of the dissenting opinions in Int'l Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP) v. Trump, IRAP actually admitted during oral argument that the second ban might be constitutional if a different president had enacted it. Literally the whole reason why the Fourth Circuit upheld the injunction against the second ban are Trump's tweets and campaign statements. That's the reason why the Fourth Circuit (1) did not defer to the president's stated purpose for the ban as legitimate and bona fide, and (2) found that the primary purpose of the law was to target a particular religious group.
All of this is true, of course. But legally speaking, it causes problems. If Trump's campaign statements undermine his stated justification for the ban, then what does he have to do in order to demonstrate good faith? Make a public apology? Should the campaign statements also undermine the stated rationale for any of his future bans? Do they extend into a hypothetical second term?
We're in uncharted legal waters here.
All of this is true, of course. But legally speaking, it causes problems. If Trump's campaign statements undermine his stated justification for the ban, then what does he have to do in order to demonstrate good faith? Make a public apology? Should the campaign statements also undermine the stated rationale for any of his future bans? Do they extend into a hypothetical second term?
We're in uncharted legal waters here.
Basically, if you are running for president, even if your whole campaign is based on appealing to WS's, nationalists, populists, let David Duke say it for you, don't ever go full grand wizard on the campaign trail.
ORDER_66
I am The Wrench in all your plans....
He knew what he was saying when he said it... Now he has to pay the price for his words!!!
When you say muslim ban it is fukking racist, no one is born a muslim, per se'. It's a fukking religion... Banning these people based on religion in itself is racist correct!! ACCORDING TO AMERICA'S OWN LAWS IT'S #INHERENTLY RACIST!!! 
Also no one poses the question why only these 7 places why not saudi arabia or the UAE citizens and officials?! Is it because their rich and the govt is constantly on their dikk for oil money?!?
fukking hypocrites the lot of them!
He ain't got the stones. Where we set this bet up at.
we just gonna ignore the father links to terrorist groups right?No. He was a UK Born citizen. Not a Libyan.