Slaimon Khan Shah
SLAIMON KHAN SHAH = SHAOLIN MONK/S OF ISLAAM
What causes these electric impulses to fire?
My athiest bruhs, thoughts on this...
- Thread starter king-laylow
- Start date
Hacksaw Jim Thuggin
Superstar
?????????
What are you asking me?
You're thinking too much about this.
I hate to cast you off with a giant "hand wave" but you need to set a weekend aside and watch ALL of The Cosmos episodes. It answers all of this in simple and clear terms that everyone should be able to grasp.
COSMOS: A Spacetime Odyssey
Chemical gradients of ions. Most notably sodium and potassium
... What does science have to do about atheism?
read this:
"There Is No Such Thing As Time" | Popular Science
Maybe it'll help you understand where I'm coming from. It's short, so don't worry.
read this:
"There Is No Such Thing As Time" | Popular Science
Maybe it'll help you understand where I'm coming from. It's short, so don't worry.
I UNDERSTAND THIS...so whats your argument?
We need units to relate the passing of events to each other.
Whats that got to do with things dying and passing on genes?
There is no way you read the article in 3 seconds. Read it and then ask the question again
USSInsiders
Banned
what if hilary and them was reptilian?why cant everybody just admit that none of us know shyt? what if there WAS a divine creator, and he popped off the big bang? what if the whole universe is just in a petri dish in some aliens lab? what if that alien is god? what if this is all just a dream? what if we are all in the matrix?
nah. even tysons views are aligned with agnostics. all you can answer is how, never why
The "why" doesn't make sense to even ask because people would always shift to ask "why" even when given an answer.
You don't understand the implications of such a question
I've already read it years ago. I know what its talking about.
"Time" isn't a thing. its a measurement. Just like temperature isn't a thing. Its a measurement.
The cells of the tissue in the heart produce this mechanism.
Well since you read it already, you should have no problem with my concern. If all "nows" exist simultaneously then evolutionary theory falls apart. Natural selection, reproduction, the passing on of genes, they all require nows to exist at different "times"
