My camera and a black woman

Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
25,907
Reputation
4,749
Daps
70,424
Reppin
NULL
Solid shots ... for me personally you have too much bloom in some of the mid depth shots. That could be your style or course but I think some of the park shots would have served the subject better with a bit more depth of focus
Break this down a little more for me if you can
 

YvrzTrvly

All Star
Joined
Jan 16, 2015
Messages
3,811
Reputation
-187
Daps
9,017
Break this down a little more for me if you can
For sure...remember this is just my preference.

A few things that bother me personally but obviously these things are subjective.

The second picture of the woman on the steps. I find the depth of field set correctly on the two where her lower half is out of frame...however the last one with her leg. Because we have reference with the leg and the bannister is such a dramatic angle for our eye I would have prefered a larger of field to really sharpen that railing. Leaving me feeling odd that we have a frame of reference from her location on the steps to the background. I would have used a different focal length there...

The second shot with skyline. It's a great shot with fore mid and background. Hard time of day to shoot but I personally think a longer shutter setting would crispen up that mid ground. A bit too much blur in the mid ground for me.

Lastly the park shots are solid again I just prefer when we can see most of the subject as it gives context clues to the setting to cleanup some of the things in the background.if anything I would shoot those shots overly detailed then in post processing add a bit of blur or distortion. Sometimes more info is better in my opinion and I generally shoot abstraction
 
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
25,907
Reputation
4,749
Daps
70,424
Reppin
NULL
For sure...remember this is just my preference.

A few things that bother me personally but obviously these things are subjective.

The second picture of the woman on the steps. I find the depth of field set correctly on the two where her lower half is out of frame...however the last one with her leg. Because we have reference with the leg and the bannister is such a dramatic angle for our eye I would have prefered a larger of field to really sharpen that railing. Leaving me feeling odd that we have a frame of reference from her location on the steps to the background. I would have used a different focal length there...

The second shot with skyline. It's a great shot with fore mid and background. Hard time of day to shoot but I personally think a longer shutter setting would crispen up that mid ground. A bit too much blur in the mid ground for me.

Lastly the park shots are solid again I just prefer when we can see most of the subject as it gives context clues to the setting to cleanup some of the things in the background.if anything I would shoot those shots overly detailed then in post processing add a bit of blur or distortion. Sometimes more info is better in my opinion and I generally shoot abstraction
I’ll analyze and consider all the feedback. This was my second time doing portraits and my first time with this new camera so I’m looking to learn
 

Tribal Outkast

Veteran
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
38,162
Reputation
6,212
Daps
116,782
nah get a r10 or a used rp or r
mirrorless is where its at
I’m with you too. Some people don’t want to drop that much for a camera out the gate though. I’m a mirrorless fan, have several cameras especially with this being my day job and side hustle sometimes
 
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
25,907
Reputation
4,749
Daps
70,424
Reppin
NULL
nah get a r10 or a used rp or r
mirrorless is where its at
Was gonna ask you in the photography thread it since you here

1. Why are you partial to canon?
2. I need a shorter focal length for travel, and other things. 70-180 isn’t going suit certain situations.

Thinking about the 18-35 for versatility. You think that’s a good choice
 
Top