These calculations are nonsense. NASA just has to look like its doing something in order to keep the ponzi scheme going
Facts
add in space force also
Nasa is tracking a newly discovered asteroid that has a 'small' chance of hitting Earth on Valentine's Day 2046
- Thread starter acri1
- Start date
Facts
add in space force also
MajesticLion
Veteran
The Goa'uld are at it again 
You did the math huh?These calculations are nonsense. NASA just has to look like its doing something in order to keep the ponzi scheme going
In 2046 the thread title would be “Asteroid bout to hit Earth and wipe out all cacs appreciation”
I just need to know their calculations are wrong to know this prediction down to the day is nonsense. We already know they cant tell you the exact size of asteroids. And there have been debates on how far off they are. Not to mention they cant predict the forces light could play ,and there are just too many unknown variables in space. Plus you dont know the starting point of the asteroid. Ever seen a MLB pitcher throw a ball that looks like its going straight,but it curves at the last minute? It would be the sweetest justice if God hit these arrogant Babylonians with the Roger Clemons curveball from the sky
“ever since I turned 61,these young hoes won’t leave me alone “"Dried up thots from back in the day looking to shack up unappreciation thread"
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,062
- Reputation
- 8,164
- Daps
- 122,346
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
How would you know their calculations are wrong when you don't even know what they are? Telling the size of a distant object isn't the same as predicting it's path and gravity is the ONLY 'force' acting on it since space is a vacuum. Light isn't a force. You don't need to know it's origin to calculate a moving object's trajectory using orbital mechanics, which has been the case.....
en.m.wikipedia.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
....and this one isn't going to hit Earth on Valentine's Day. Read the article:
Comet Hale–Bopp - Wikipedia
Halley's Comet - Wikipedia
....and this one isn't going to hit Earth on Valentine's Day. Read the article:
Your objection is nothing more than an argument from incredulity. Just because you can't understand something (and didn't read the article) doesn't invalidate it and makes you look stupid.
Last edited:
Cupids comet
How would you know their calculations are wrong when you don't even know what they are? Telling the size of a distant object isn't the same as predicting it's path and gravity is the ONLY 'force' acting on it since space is a vacuum. Light isn't a force. You don't need to know it's origin to calculate a moving object's trajectory using orbital mechanics, which has been the case.....
Comet Hale–Bopp - Wikipedia
Halley's Comet - Wikipedia
....and this one isn't going to hit Earth on Valentine's Day. Read the article:
Your objection is nothing more than an argument from incredulity. Just because you can't understand something (and didn't read the article) doesn't invalidate it and makes you look stupid.
The next sentence says they predict a small chance of impact. Meaning it will EITHER simply make a close approach on Valentines Day. Or it will actually impact.
You dont need to know the calculations to know if they are accurate. You just need to know the manner in which they came up with the calculations is nonsense. They use infared thermal imaging like The Predator. But they have to use guesswork and make assumptions about the makeup of the asteroid,its surface and the shape. With all that guessing,no way can you call the predictions accurate.#PsuedoScience
Also last I checked light is a force,but the European has their own definitions and changes these things as they please, so maybe I missed the indoctrination update
Heartbreaking 
