Nate Parker does interview with Ebony Magazine to clean his image. Should've done this first

Dr. Narcisse

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2014
Messages
52,760
Reputation
12,161
Daps
173,718
They got to him.

And I don't mean this as a conspiracy theory. I mean they broke his spirit. Dude went from talking about not wanting to portray an emasculated black man by wearing dresses and emphatically standing up for his innocence (in a case he was EXONERATED of all charges for) to talking about male priveledge and apologizing to homosexuals.


Dude check listed off the sell-outs guide to white acceptance one by fukking one.

- Apologize for that which you are innocent of to appease Cacs

- Apologize for some mythologized theory of Black male priveledge that only exists to make black males feel as if they some type of Ill-gotten "power" that exists only within in the minds of those of who believe in the Easter bunny and Santa Clause

- Apologize for saying that you will NOT wear dresses and perform acts of homosexuality on screen to appease Gays and Tranny's.

- Marry a White Woman








I mean holy fukking shyt all of this is totally AGAINST what Nat Turner stood for
:wow:
 

Neuromancer

Live Wire Vodoo
Supporter
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
85,061
Reputation
17,854
Daps
206,103
Reppin
Villa Straylight.
I'm still waiting for someone to tell me how all societies magically became patriarchy. From what I read by Simone De Beauvoir men and women went to war with each other or something like that and women lost so they became the second tier. I don't know if that's correct. Can someone enlighten me because it seems as though that's what the animal kingdom looks like as well. If I could get an answer it'd be appreciative.
 

Neuromancer

Live Wire Vodoo
Supporter
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
85,061
Reputation
17,854
Daps
206,103
Reppin
Villa Straylight.
:manny: pretty much. Downplaying a man because he doesn't have a bytch in his bed when he isn't bringing bread home or getting a new bytch. Questioning how he can condone such fakkitry like wearing jeans that are slim or listening to Frank Ocean. "You're not a man if..." is basically questioning why they aren't living up to male stereotypes from the 50's.
Actually I think those standards date back further than the 50's. If any of the things I've read about Hunter gather societies is true.
 

George's Dilemma

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
27,793
Reputation
7,370
Daps
136,154
Isn't it possible that the woman IS giving signals that she doesn't want to have sex but the male who does want to have sex is completely oblivious to these signals'?

This is the entire point of the consent argument, if you explicitly ask for verbal consent, there is NO ambiguity about what's happening. Arguing that "she didn't stop me so I thought she was down" isn't the best route to go considering what the consequences might be if you find yourself in a courtroom being accused of rape when you thought it was consensual sex


This again is why I say the way folks are attempting to tackle "rape culture" without tackling alcohol abuse will never make any strides in combatting the problem. They were both faded, and he possibly misread her. We'll never know what happened that night. Still I hate that college folks drink irresponsibily and then put the public through the media and judicial system in the hot seat trying to determine the impossible. That being whether or not a rape occurred.

I'm about at a point that when these rape accusations come up and it turns out both parties were intoxicated, I dont care. I feel like when that info comes out there shouldnt even be a trial, and no media coverage. Stop gettin tanked and asking the public for justice when we werent there and dont know what happened. The best is these women who dont remember the night before......at all. But want justice, despite not remembering anything.
 

AlainLocke

Banned
Joined
Dec 16, 2015
Messages
16,259
Reputation
2,635
Daps
74,083
I'm still waiting for someone to tell me how all societies magically became patriarchy. From what I read by Simone De Beauvoir men and women went to war with each other or something like that and women lost so they became the second tier. I don't know if that's correct. Can someone enlighten me because it seems as though that's what the animal kingdom looks like as well. If I could get an answer it'd be appreciative.

First we need to determine what a Patriarchy is in feminism and what a Patriarchy is in everyday life.

In feminism a Patriarchy is like Lord Voldemort. It's an entity that is male and it oppresses women everywhere. When bad shyt happens "it is because Patriarchy."

In everyday life and usage, Patriarchy is a system where men hold political, legal, economic, familial authority. Human beings have not always been patriarchal, patriarchy started when human beings decided to stop being hunter and gathers and started being farmers. This created the first family unit...but WHY?

Well it's quite simple, almost every male mammal competes against his brothers for sexual access. Once human beings settled down, this created a notion of property and family. A man wants to get the most women and only way he can do that is if he is the most handsome of the bunch or the richest of the bunch.

So when human beings domesticated themselves, men with the most sheep, men with the most bison, men with the most wheat...got the most bytches. And with economic power, comes military power and then political power. Now you have kings and dukes and lords.

And of course women understand this. So they have a deal, they want some of that power but they don't wanna do anything for it, so THEY MARRY. Let the men take the risk and let the women reap the most benefit. I'll be part of your property so I don't have to do anything out here. That's what marriage is.

A man takes that deal because he wants something to fukk on a consistent basis, he doesn't want to go looking for p*ssy every day. He doesn't wanna battle men everyday. So he restricts his sexual access to other women, to have one woman. Through marriage he gets sexual security.

And since men and women no longer moved around, place to place, in large tribes, you know who your kid is. Now you have an understanding of what a lineage is. So your family becomes part of your property too. Now you pass down your titles and your property to your sons because your daughters are going to go to another man and be part of his property. Your sons are gonna need titles and property to get women so he can continue your bloodline.

This is overall the general evolution of Patriarchy. Patriarchy only occurred due the notion of property and wealth. Patriarchy could have never occurred if women did not leverage their p*ssy for security. Patriarchy could have never occurred if men did not know who they kids are.

This is mostly the European conception of Patriarchy. In Africa, the society is semi-patriarchal due to the family is matrilineal. So in Africa, the child belong to the mother and the uncle acted like a father figure. Also in Africa, they didn't use animals to farm, they used the hoe, so a prominent property holding man would have multiple wives to work the farm. He would have a lot of children but he never owned them, like the European. Instead of small family units, you would have clans.

Men and women did not have a war, men and women made a deal based on already existing evolutionary behaviors. Instead of women going with the strongest warrior that fought to the death to win her p*ssy or the best hunter that got the killed the most animals, she goes with the biggest property holder. That's all that changed.


What feminism really is, is renegotiating the deal. Feminism only occurred after the Industrial Revolution. Property holding men, the patriarchs were getting money and bytches wasn't. Women were like "Hey, okay, this too much money you are making, you are getting too powerful, we want some of her individuality back, we wanna be able to vote."

Mind you, non-property holding men, were at the absolutely bottom of society and wasn't allowed to vote. A woman can always use her p*ssy to jump classes. Hypergamy is a woman's chief survival strategy.

Then the Baby Boom happened, and it was the same thing, "Hey, you need to share some of this wealth with us. We want to be able to go to work. Also we need to be able to have sex with as many partners we want without having a child."

Of course this gave women their greatest strength, it allows a woman to be around men with money on a consistent basis. It also allow women to throw p*ssy at as many guys as she wants without risking a pregnancy with the wrong guy.

Women like to get the biggest reward for very little effort. It's their natural behavior. Women use deception. Whether it is feigning societal weakness or putting on make-up.

Women control society through p*ssy power by controlling men. Behind every powerful man there is a woman. And the woman is telling the man what do. She is planning his career. Controlling his finances.

You can look at the concept of First Lady and see how women really work. Go read about Eleanor Roosevelt or Hilary Clinton. Go read about Clementine Churchill.

Women always want to big up the women who were single and out doing shyt on their own, they never want to show you the women with a man in power, leading him. They don't want you to see how women control things in the world.

I just wanna say, I am not in favor of Patriarchy, the shyt is dumb. I take all the risks and all the challenges and a woman is supposed to reap the most benefit because she has a vagina. That's Patriarchy in a nutshell.
 
Last edited:

Danktoker94

The Dude
Supporter
Joined
Jan 29, 2016
Messages
6,247
Reputation
-720
Daps
18,541
Black gays are just mad cause they kno in the hood that gay shyt will never appeal like the way it does for cacs
 

Neuromancer

Live Wire Vodoo
Supporter
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
85,061
Reputation
17,854
Daps
206,103
Reppin
Villa Straylight.
First we need to determine what a Patriarchy is in feminism and what a Patriarchy is in everyday life.

In feminism a Patriarchy is like Lord Voldemort. It's an entity that male and it oppresses women everywhere. When bad shyt happens "it is because Patriarchy."

In everyday life and usage, Patriarchy is a system where men hold political, legal, economic, familial authority. Human beings have not always been patriarchal, patriarchy started when human beings decided to stop being hunter and gathers and started being farmers. This created the first family unit...but WHY?

Well it's quite simple, almost every male mammal competes against his brothers for sexual access. Once human beings settled down, this created a notion of property and family. A man wants to get the most women and only way he can do that is if he is the most handsome of the bunch or the richest of the bunch.

So when human beings domesticated themselves, men with the most sheep, men with the most bison, men with the most wheat...got the most bytches. And with economic power, comes military power and then political power. Now you have kings and dukes and lords.

And of course women understand this. So they have a deal, they want some of that power but they don't wanna do anything for it, so THEY MARRY. Let the men take the risk and let the women reap the most benefit. I'll be part of your property so I don't have to do anything out here. That's what marriage is.

A man takes that deal because he wants something to fukk on a consistent basis, he doesn't want to go looking for p*ssy every day. He doesn't wanna battle men everyday.

And since men and women no longer moved around, place to place, in large tribes, you know who your kid is. Now you have an understanding of what a lineage is. So your family becomes part of your property too. Now you pass down your titles and your property to your sons because your daughters are going to go to another man and be part of his property. Your sons are gonna need titles and property to get women so he can continue your bloodline.

This is overall the general evolution of Patriarchy. Patriarchy only occurred due the notion of property and wealth. Patriarchy could have never occurred if women did not leverage their p*ssy for security. Patriarchy could have never occurred if men did not know who they kids are.

This is mostly the European conception of Patriarchy. In Africa, the society is semi-patriarchal due to the family is matrilineal. So in Africa, the child belong to the mother and the uncle acted like a father figure. Also in Africa, they didn't use animals to farm, they used the hoe, so a prominent property holding man would have multiple wives to work the farm. He would have a lot of children but he never owned them, like the European. Instead of small family units, you would have clans.

Men and women did not have a war, men and women made a deal based on already existing evolutionary behaviors. Instead of women going with the strongest warrior that fought to the death to win her p*ssy or the best hunter that got the killed the most animals, she goes with the biggest property holder. That's all that changed.


What feminism really is, is renegotiating the deal. Feminism only occurred after the Industrial Revolution. Property holding men, the patriarchs were getting money and bytches wasn't. Women were like "Hey, okay, this too much money you are making, you are getting too powerful, we want some of her individuality back, we wanna be able to vote."

Mind you, non-property holding men, were at the absolutely bottom of society and wasn't allowed to vote. A woman can always use her p*ssy to jump classes. Hypergamy is a woman's chief survival strategy.

Then the baby boom happened, and it was the same thing, "Hey, you need to share some of this wealth with us. We want to be able to go to work. Also we need to be able to have sex with as many partners we want without having a child."

Of course this gave women their greatest strength, it allows a woman to be around men with money a consistent basis. It also allow women to throw p*ssy at as many guys as she wants without risking a pregnancy with the wrong guy.

Women like to get the biggest reward for very little effort. It's their natural behavior. Women use deception. Whether it is feigning societal weakness or putting on make-up.

Women control society through p*ssy power by controlling men. Behind every powerful man there is a woman. And the woman is telling the man what do. She is planning his career. Controlling his finances.

You can look at the concept of First Lady and see how women really work. Go read about Eleanor Roosevelt or Hilary Clinton. Go read about Clementine Churchill.

Women always want to big up the women who were single and out doing shyt on their own, they never want to show you the women with a man in power, leading him. They don't want you to see how women control things in the world.

I just wanna say, I am not in favor of Patriarchy, the shyt is dumb. I take all the risks and all the challenges and a woman is supposed to reap the most benefit because she has a vagina. That's Patriarchy in a nutshell.
Very detailed answer thank you.

Can anyone rebut this?
 
Top