Honestly if I was sure that Team 2 would simply keep giving the rock to Shaq they'd win... but with Iverson and Kobe I can't be so sure about that.
But on some real shyt neither team would be able to stop the other. It'd basically just depend on the day they played, Team 1 would win a couple games in a row, Team 2 would win a couple games in a row. I hate questions like this (and the one-on-ones) because it makes people assume that one player (or team) would beat the other one every time, and that's not the case. This shyt is pretty much even.
Team 1. Hakeem could pull Shaq out of the paint, opening up the driving lanes for Jordan and Zeke. Only real advantage Team 2 has is 3-point shooting. Also, Team 2 has a bigger chance of one of em saying fukk it and checking out because they aren't getting the ball.
I remember Mike saying Kobe would be tough 1 on 1 because he stole all his moves.
And Mike said Hakeem was the best center.
I've always wondered who was the best guard 6-1 and shorter, but I don't think anyone in that height range can really check A.I..
I'd say Team 1, but I think A.I. and Kobe could get hot enough to steal one.
I don't think it's that simple; it depends on how the parts are used. A Kobe - Shaq pick and roll would very effective because Shaq was so massive. As one poster mentioned, continously dumping the ball to Shaq wouldn't be a bad option either. A.I. iso on Zek could be lights out on a A.I. 50+ type shooting game.
Remember, loser's out. So the opposing team gets ball after scores.
I don't remember Zeke's jumper being too legit, but A.I.'s dribble pull up was nasty when he got it going. And he was one of the best finishers among the trees for his height.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.