NBA All-Quarter Century Teams: LeBron, Kobe, Steph are locks, but center and power forward debates get tricky

[RedBull]

PG: STEPH
SG: KOBE
SF: KD
PF: DUNCAN
C: SHAQ

You just couldn’t help yourself.

 

[CHICAGO]

THEY PLAYING WITH SHAQS NAME
FOR ENGAGEMENT
BUT CANT SAY I FEEL SORRY
FOR HIM AFTER HE STARTED
THAT KOBE BULLshyt


​

 

[CHICAGO]

Kawhi is the clear #2 SF. We gotta stop with the putting KD on the edge of Lebron/Kobe & Wade tier of guys.

With that said KD is the clear #3 SF.

WORST POST IN THE THREAD



​

 

[In The Zone '98]

The titles have to weigh more than the MVPs.

Cmon now. Lol

#Diesel

 

[CHICAGO]

Harden is a point guard. Should be him vs CP3 for 2nd team.

Giannis vs Duncan isn't really tricky since 90% of Duncan's career still happened after 1999, and he's viewed as someone in the top 5-7 GOAT conversation.

Jokic vs Shaq is more "interesting" since we're omitting the better half of Shaq's career ('92-'99). So basically Shaq's 4 title seasons vs Jokic's 6 to 7 great to monsterous individual seasons

Dirk over Garnett is interesting as well, but i get it. The early 00s was basically a 2-man debate between Duncan vs KG. Duncan basically left him in the dust and then Dirk sneakily got in the convo for #2 without there ever being a direct ongoing comparison with KG like there was with KG/Duncan. Dirk vs KG seemed to pick up only happen after 2011... since the stigma on Dirk was he was a p*ssy, until he wasn't (2011) and then you had to reframe the entire narrative about him.

SHAQ WAS 7X FIRST TEAM
ALL NBA, 2X ALL DEFENSE,
SCORING CHAMP, RUNNER UP DPOY
ON TOP OF A DAMN 3PEAT

LMAO @ REDUCING HIS
2000S TO "FOUR TITLE SEASONS"
JUST TO ACT LIKE ITS CLOSE



​

 

[bzb]

shaq would abuse jokic. would do that boy like he did dudley. fix that and i have the first team beating everyone else in 6 games or less.

 

[Torrential]

Not putting Shaq over jokic is as outrageous as the bleacher report article

 

[UpNext]

They right. Dirk wasn't better than KG or AD. I can understand the Shaq pick since you're basically removing 7 all star seasons

 

[Mandizi]

Shaq >>> Jokic and not adding Garnett is disrespectful

 

[In The Zone '98]

Jokic vs Shaq is more "interesting" since we're omitting the better half of Shaq's career lSo basically Shaq's 4 title seasons vs Jokic's 6 to 7 great to monsterous individual seasons

You gotta be 25 years old

 

[FukkaPaidEmail]

Only issue is Jokic over Shaq.

KG is glaring but ldk how you put him over Giannis And him vs Dirk is a legit fight and I’ll lean toward Dirk

 

[Nero Christ]

Article just trying to get outrage clicks with that Jokic shyt but Shaq don’t got enough diehard fans for it to even gain steam

To be fair, Shaq’s own actions over the past couple of years has cost him fans.

 

[MikelArteta]

how many rings you got jokic?

 

[RedBull]

I’m convinced these lists are created just for clicks. Someone is always slighted on purpose. No center was better than Shaq in the past 25 years.

Westbrook is 2nd team. Let’s be real.

 

[nieman]

To be fair, Shaq’s own actions over the past couple of years has cost him fans.

But Shaq's action have been the same throughout his entire career. It's not like he just changed to become as he is now.

And why isn't Westbrook on here?