https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nb...an-rule-reckless-closeouts-flagrants-or-techs
Basically if you get zaza'd refs can call a flagrant foul.
Basically if you get zaza'd refs can call a flagrant foul.


A lot more flopping coming uphttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nb...an-rule-reckless-closeouts-flagrants-or-techs
Basically if you get zaza'd refs can call a flagrant foul.
Every flagrant foul call is subjective.Stupid rule change.
Far too subjective, officials should only have open and shut designation, not judging shyt like "reckless"

Every flagrant foul call is subjective.
WTF are you talking about?
![]()
In my heart I want to get rid of all the flagrant fouls and let's go back to the Bad Boy Pistons era and let the players police themselves.The delinition of flagrant 1 and 2 is subjective, but flagrant in itself isn't IMO.
That said I'm of the opinion that flagrant 1 and 2 shuld be removed and and something more concrete should be listed, such as the unofficial criteria as strikes to the head or above the shoulder and etc.

