much more respect. especially when they take a paycut like dirk and timmy.
much more respect. especially when they take a paycut like dirk and timmy.
i'm a Kobe enthusiast the fukk i got to be mad about.
what about dudes that stay even when the team is garbage..like Dirk and Kobe

Doesn't mean a damn thing. Everyone's situation is different.
If KG never leaves the Wolves, he's seen as a perennial loser, much like Melo and T-Mac.
You can't have it both ways. You can't judge a player largely by team success (rings), but then ask said player to remain loyal as opposed to seeking out the best situation for him to attain team success.
The guys who've stayed in one city typically were in a great situation to begin with. A larger market attractive to free agents and they always had talent around them. Wade in the post-Shaq years prior to 2010 is probably the one exception.
The post-Shaq years prior to 2008 had LA leaning. How could anyone forget about the Smush Parker years?
nothing at all? so player A hopping from team to team for his rings is equal to player b staying in the same city for his?
Cause you're a bytch
Everybody knows this is a Tobe simp thread.do they deserve more respect than those that hop from situation to situation?
guys like Magic, Duncan, Kobe, Bird, Dirk, Jordan, Wade..etc
I think its special when a player comes into the league with one team, has a great career, then leaves on the same team..
how yall feel about this? does it add to the legacy?
Durant's legacy could be great if he stays in okc and wins some rings down there



at people acting like Kobe and Wade were some sort of saints for sticking with teams that they won titles with AND who's down fall they contributed to (Kobe forcing Shaq and Phil out, Wade being hurt) AND whose down periods lasted 3 years. Kobe was ready to jump ship until they turned it around and who knows what Wade does if Bron and co. don't come to town.