Lemme guess, my copy of the game has a massive downgrade compared to the retail copy screenshot Rekka posted?![]()
Replicate the shot or move on to the next nonsense plees
Lemme guess, my copy of the game has a massive downgrade compared to the retail copy screenshot Rekka posted?![]()
the photo mode lets you pan tilt zoom adjust color grading focus etc.
Not easy to get spectacular moments and angle you know, that persons shot was just well done.
Some people have done shots in photo mode that are amazing
Ryse must look pretty damn good thenWhen you claim a game is cutscenes you're basically conceding that you think it looks better![]()

they may be promotional shots, but the game really looks like that and those are captures of real movesWhy can't y'all replicte something even similar to it.
What about the one with the chain?
That's not a photomode shot that someone took and posted
It's a promotional shot from this article
http://m.digitaltrends.com/gaming/infamous-second-son-guide/#!ZsCwT
Not that it "can't" be in game. Just the fact that it "isn't" in game. It's not the type of thing you will see regularly in the game. They are specific shots at specific moments/angles that may even be doctored up a bit to show the game in the best light. The ryse shots i posted are direct in game shots its exactly what you see when playing the game, and the level of detail, quality of textures is much higher than infamous. The skin in infamous looks like rubber, in ryse not only does the skin reflect light realistically it has realistic blemishes/scuffs, it stretches/bends and the facial animation tech is in full motion DURING gameplay, not just cutscenes. There was a kokatu article talking about how the graphics are so detailed that they are part of the gameplay because you have to watch small facial and physical cues in order to excell at combat.they may be promotional shots, but the game really looks like that and those are captures of real moves
what about the chain seems like it can't be from in game to you?
Why can't y'all replicte something even similar to it.
What about the one with the chain?
That's not a photomode shot that someone took and posted
It's a promotional shot from this article
http://m.digitaltrends.com/gaming/infamous-second-son-guide/#!ZsCwT

have you played the game?Not that it "can't" be in game. Just the fact that it "isn't" in game. It's not the type of thing you will see regularly in the game. They are specific shots at specific moments/angles that may even be doctored up a bit to show the game in the best light. The ryse shots i posted are direct in game shots its exactly what you see when playing the game, and the level of detail, quality of textures is much higher than infamous. The skin in infamous looks like rubber, in ryse not only does the skin reflect light realistically it has realistic blemishes/scuffs, it stretches/bends and the facial animation tech is in full motion DURING gameplay, not just cutscenes. There was a kokatu article talking about how the graphics are so detailed that they are part of the gameplay because you have to watch small facial and physical cues in order to excell at combat.
Infamous looks great, but it doesn't look as good as ryse.
Yo are the mods really just gonna let this guy roam this thread trolling??
@GoldenGlove
@midwesthiphop
@Liquid
@cook
Can y'all ban him from this thread?? This shyt is now about Infamous second son screens. Wtf. If not I'll just ignore him.
@KushSkywalker
Stop responding to him. He's going to keep switching up shyt just to keep picking away. Dude is a clown.
Yo are the mods really just gonna let this guy roam this thread trolling??
@GoldenGlove
@midwesthiphop
@Liquid
@cook
Can y'all ban him from this thread?? This shyt is now about Infamous second son screens. Wtf. If not I'll just ignore him.
@KushSkywalker
Stop responding to him. He's going to keep switching up shyt just to keep picking away. Dude is a clown.

And still none of those are as detailed as those promo shots.
who gives a shyt, the fidelity on the in game shots are close enough like the promos why the semantics and nitpicking. Goddamit.who gives a shyt, the fidelity on the in game shots are close enough like the promos why the semantics and nitpicking. Goddamit.
And all I originally said was that they were some cutscene/photomode shyt.
Which they are, so why so much contention to that statement from y'all?

Because that's your M.O. on the Coli you nitpick every goddamn thing, even when given full blown proof you spin it and weasel your way out of shyt, deflecting it into a new arguement. When have you ever said damn you guys are right, I am wrong. You can NEVER admit your wrong....
![]()
