New SNAP rule change just made it harder to combat future recessions

OfTheCross

Veteran
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
43,548
Reputation
5,024
Daps
99,029
Reppin
Keeping my overhead low, and my understand high
  • Existing Eligibility (purple): The purple line shows the existing set of eligibility standards as well as policy changes made by USDA and Congress over the course of the Great Recession to increase waiver eligibility, including 1) a 3-month and a 12-month average unemployment rate of 10 percent, 2) a 24-month average unemployment rate of rate 20 percent above the national average for the same period, 3) qualifying for unemployment insurance EB, 4) qualifying for Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC), and 5) qualifying under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA).
  • Proposed Eligibility (green): The green line models the share of counties that would have been eligible for a work requirement waiver from 2007 to 2017 had the original proposed rule been in place with the following criteria: 1) a 12-month average unemployment rate of 10 percent, 2) a 24-month average unemployment rate 20 percent above the national average for the same period with a 6 percent unemployment rate floor, and 3) qualifying for EB.
  • Final Rule (teal): The teal line models the share of counties that would have been eligible for a work requirement waiver from 2007 to 2017 had the final rule been in place with the following criteria: 1) a 12-month average unemployment rate of 10 percent, and 2) a 24-month average unemployment rate 20 percent above the national average for the same period with a 6 percent unemployment rate floor. The crucial difference between proposed rule and the final rule is that qualifying for EB no longer makes an area eligible for a work requirement waiver.
figure-1-LO.png


New SNAP rule change just made it harder to combat future recessions
 
Top