David_TheMan
Banned
the thread literally says "brain development"
And all you have to do is bring up and quote the post where i argued kids should smoke pot.
Why haven't you done it yet?
New study: cannibus stunts brain development
- Thread starter Xtraz2
- Start date
And all you have to do is bring up and quote the post where i argued kids should smoke pot.
Why haven't you done it yet?
The study is probably accurate...All the people I know who started using it real young (12 years) are still idiots and ended up strongly addicted the ones who started at 17-18 it didnt impact their lives as much.
Though there may be some correlation with bad parenting,abuse ,neglect because parents who dont take action when a 12 year old comes home reeking of weed are already setting their kids up for failure.
Though there may be some correlation with bad parenting,abuse ,neglect because parents who dont take action when a 12 year old comes home reeking of weed are already setting their kids up for failure.
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Anybody got the study on how many people die from MJ use annually? 
Probably more like 23 and under for men and 21 and under for women.This applies to minors (people 16 and under)
It still has affects on short-term memory even after development.
Marijuana "enthusiasts" and "advocates" want to pretend like its a harmless drug, and while its not nearly as bad for you as "harder" drugs, its not exactly the healthiest thing possible.
ill
Superstar
I don't think any true advocate pretends its completely harmless or healthy. Advocates tend to fight against the fear mongering propaganda thats been placed in our society to demonize the herb. Its far less harmful than cigarettes or alcohol yet when people talk about cannabis, its automatically lumped in with the heroin, coke, and meth of the world. Its obvious inhaling any kind of smoke is bad for your health but there are ways around inhaling combustibles. Vaping and edibles are one of the ways around this.
ill
Superstar
you see this shyt passing in mass? i cant call it
Its hard to tell. I personally don't think its going to pass this election. Too many big name politicians are against it and tbh the law is kind of shytty and heavily favors big money corporations to come in and monopolize our market.
ill
Superstar
You should probably smoke a joint every week and chill out braaaahh. Maybe it'll help with your aneurysms when Putin does something that upsets you.
ill
Superstar
What is your point? That pot addicts are in denial?
Like I said I'm pro pot legalization, but you have to be naive, stupid, or in denial ( :scumbag: ) to imply that pot is not addictive. Let me guess.... you smoke regularly because you "want" to, not because you have to:yadontsay:
Pot is addictive only for a small percentage of the population. The addiction rates are far lower than any hard drug, alcohol, or cigarettes. Typical pot "addiction" is psychological and not psychical dependence. Thats a HUGE difference in withdrawal symptoms and a huge difference in how intense the "addiction" is.
http://www.umbrellasociety.ca/web/files/u1/Comp_epidemiology_addiction.pdf
Look at the page numbered 251 and it has a chart with addiction rates.
And again, pot "addiction" is viewed as a joke. If you can find me a person in rehab for pot addiction, I'll PayPal you $20.
ExodusNirvana
Change is inevitable...
Chill
While I agree it's absurd...save your $20. There are tons of fukktard parents in the midwest and even in wealthy counties in CA that send their kids to rehab for "pot addiction" when really it's just a few weeks of them chilling out and doing nothing and totally ignoring the root of the problem which is that they are entitled fukktards.
shyt I believe even Brad Pitt went to rehab for pot and not because he was an entitled fukktard but because he started giving zero fukks about things to the point that his friends were "concerned" for his safety and his career
So basically...rich folk and spoiled brats go to rehab for pot addiction. May be a correlation there
Last edited: