How did luck find a way to lose? He drove them down the field with less than 4 min to give them the go ahead touchdown. He did everything he could except play corner for his team to win. Just because luck doesn't play with Richard Sherman and Earl Thomas he's somehow finding a way for his team to lose![]()

This is a Kobe Stan type argument. The colts put up over 30 and lost. Luck three for 385 yards with 4 touchdowns and no turnovers and have his team the lead with 37 seconds left. The colts defense gave up 37 points, and lost the game for the offense in under 40 seconds. Call me crazy, but they probably deserve some blame for this loss.What did Luck do in the first half?
Learned that last year. For all the fantasy stats he puts up he's a turnover machine and will make you break your tv fumbling in the 4th quarter.The Chiefs don't need Jamaal Charles as badly as we thought they did, although they probably still need him.
Nahpanthers still look like best team in nfc despite a "loss".![]()
This is a Kobe Stan type argument. The colts put up over 30 and lost. Luck three for 385 yards with 4 touchdowns and no turnovers and have his team the lead with 37 seconds left. The colts defense gave up 37 points, and lost the game for the offense in under 40 seconds. Call me crazy, but they probably deserve some blame for this loss.
So he should go play corner or linebacker? He gave them almost 400 yards, 4 scores, no turnovers, and the lead with 37 seconds left. If the defense can't play their part for 37 seconds, then it's on them. I suppose the colts 2007, 2008, and 2010 playoff losses where the defense gave up the lead in the final minute when Peyton left the field with a lead are on him too right? I mean that's the argument you're making.Luck frequently does that playing catchup in the second half and it's not always going to work.
Luck frequently plays catchup in the second half after not doing much in the first half and it's not always going to work.