Cave Savage
Feminist
He does not deserve the mvp he puts u all his big numbers against trash teams and looks avg against good teams
He scored at least 28 points in all but 3 games
He does not deserve the mvp he puts u all his big numbers against trash teams and looks avg against good teams
Jonathan Taylor is MVP
I agree
If Indy wins out, Jonathan Taylor should win MVP in a LANDSLIDE.
But I'm sure he will be forced to settle for OPOY.
Y'all put too much stock into trying to make a non-QB the best player in football.
Taylor isn't having a better season than Brady, and if Henry didn't get hurt he wouldn't be having a better season than him either.
thats just the narrative. there is literally nothing a non qb can do to get the award in my opinion. decade ago non qbs were getting the award and historically the qb should still be valued. some qbs should be out of the convo with some of the performances they have had. Stafford threw pick 6s in 3 weeks in a row and his team lost all 3 of those games and you telling me he can put himself back in the conversation? But Taylor cant? Thats terrible IMO.MVP doesn't mean best player (if it did, then Aaron Donald should win the award). It means most valuable to his team's success. Historically, no position is valued more than a QB. But, no matter how good a QB is, at the end of the day his success literally depends on everybody else's around him.
Brady is barely having a better year than Matt Stafford, who was leading the MVP race until Tennessee stomped the Rams. If Stafford lights up Arizona, he's right back in the conversation. Hell, based on numbers Kirk Cousins would be having a MVP year if the Vikings' record was better. Brady is playing spectacularly, but he's not doing anything at a level well beyond what others at his position are doing. He's just doing this shyt at an age nobody has before.
The Indianapolis Colts, after starting 1-4 (and don't come over here about this record because Derek Carr was the MVP leader after the first month of the season) have won 6 of their last 8 games. You can look directly at Jonathan Taylor's numbers and see that they have significantly increased during that span of success.
They've got the Patriots and the Cardinals up next among other teams. If Taylor really cuts it on, runs through them on his way to crossing 2,000 rushing yards and 20-something TDs AND Indy wins the rest of its games, he SHOULD easily be the MVP. That doesn't mean he will get the award, though.
Y'all put too much stock into trying to make a non-QB the best player in football.
Taylor isn't having a better season than Brady, and if Henry didn't get hurt he wouldn't be having a better season than him either.
thats the problem. the system is broken. just rename the awardThis is fact!!!
There will probably never be another non-Qb to win the award unless they really break every record and carry his team to the playoffs
MVP doesn't mean best player (if it did, then Aaron Donald should win the award). It means most valuable to his team's success. Historically, no position is valued more than a QB. But, no matter how good a QB is, at the end of the day his success literally depends on everybody else's around him.
Brady is barely having a better year than Matt Stafford, who was leading the MVP race until Tennessee stomped the Rams. If Stafford lights up Arizona, he's right back in the conversation. Hell, based on numbers Kirk Cousins would be having a MVP year if the Vikings' record was better. Brady is playing spectacularly, but he's not doing anything at a level well beyond what others at his position are doing. He's just doing this shyt at an age nobody has before.
The Indianapolis Colts, after starting 1-4 (and don't come over here about this record because Derek Carr was the MVP leader after the first month of the season) have won 6 of their last 8 games. You can look directly at Jonathan Taylor's numbers and see that they have significantly increased during that span of success.
They've got the Patriots and the Cardinals up next among other teams. If Taylor really cuts it on, runs through them on his way to crossing 2,000 rushing yards and 20-something TDs AND Indy wins the rest of its games, he SHOULD easily be the MVP. That doesn't mean he will get the award, though.
This is fact!!!
and the fact Brady is putting up these numbers at 44 is ridiculous. I mean he’s literally putting up better numbers than every other QB by a good margin. It’s not even about who I feel is deserving of it but knowing how the system works HE WILL GET IT
There will probably never be another non-Qb to win the award unless they really break every record and carry his team to the playoffs
thats the problem. the system is broken. just rename the award
thats just the narrative. there is literally nothing a non qb can do to get the award in my opinion. decade ago non qbs were getting the award and historically the qb should still be valued. some qbs should be out of the convo with some of the performances they have had. Stafford threw pick 6s in 3 weeks in a row and his team lost all 3 of those games and you telling me he can put himself back in the conversation? But Taylor cant? Thats terrible IMO.
Rodgers is not close to or will be MVP. Its Brady's to lose. Brady will have to play horrible the next few games to allow anyone to catch him.
He scored at least 28 points in all but 3 games
Y'all put too much stock into trying to make a non-QB the best player in football.
Taylor isn't having a better season than Brady, and if Henry didn't get hurt he wouldn't be having a better season than him either.
How isn't Rodgers close to mvp he's been more consistent then Brady Brady has padded his stats when they played horrible teams but he's HD more bad games then rodgers