Nick Wright ether's Chris Mannix

[smitty22]

You went from "Nobody had the Hawks beating the Cavs in 2015" to "The majority have the Cavs winning" really damn fast.

That's what receipts will do to a man.

Here's "nobody" talking. And again, this is all before we knew Kyrie would be out too.

@Sauce Dab oh my :ThoseReceipts:

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Right, because I literally meant nobody in the world picked the Hawks. Use your fukking head. I said the overwhelming majority in my first post in the thread. And like every one since.

You're still trying to use a poll that let people vote multiple times and didn't close until after the Cavs had won the series.

Of COURSE people started voting for the Cavs when they went up 1-0, 2-0, 3-0, and then won.

I already got receipts that show that multiple people who dapped or cosigned your initial claim were picking the Hawks themselves.

You claimed that "nobody was picking the Hawks" then you claimed that the "overwhelming majority" were picking the Cavs. Yet the experts poll your own damn side posted had nearly 40% of the experts picking the Hawks, and that was before we even knew Kyrie was out for the series. The Coli poll you keep referencing had 65 votes for the Hawks, and that's even with votes coming in after the Cavs took the lead and won the series. It can't be an "overwhelming majority" if there's 65 people on the other side and a good bunch of the Cavs votes came in after the series started.

So you pulled up every single post that had the Hawks winning. Congrats. The Cavs still dominated the poll and the overwhelming majority picked them to win. But keep rewriting history though. Bron fans seem to specialize in that.

I didn't pull up "every single post" that had the Hawks winning, I answered you in less than 10 minutes.

It was that easy to pull dozens of posts with the Hawks winning. People were back and forth from the beginning.

And how can I be "rewriting history" when I have come with direct quotes for every. single. claim. I have made.

You and some of the people supporting you been looking like fools when actual receipts come in. Name one claim I've made that I couldn't back up. One.

Every claim I've made in this thread has been a verifiable fact backed up with receipts. So how could I be rewriting history? That makes you a liar. Negged.

 

[Bryan Danielson]

@ those false narratives. Nobody had the Hawks beating the Cavs in 2015. Nobody had the Raptors beating them in 2016. Nobody had the Celtics beating them last year. They were the overwhelming favorites in every one of those series. Lebron fans trying to re-write recent history as if we all just forgot or something is honestly hilarious.

Nope...... that’s not true

Kobe street team not gonna derail this and muddy things up. Everything he said was true..... the past few years people thought Bos & Toronto was gonna stop Bron..... I remember them peak Bulls years when Rose was healthy and later Butler was cooking it was “Bron won’t get passed the Bulls”

Every year weeks leading up to the playoff (this year included),

Every time a Lebron team lost or loses a game, there’s soooooooo much commentary on the problems with his team, how he doesn’t have it anymore or how such and such is better than Bron and will beat him in the playoffs.

Every year it’s been the same, not sure how anyone can dispute it

Martha

 

[GOAT]

You're still trying to use a poll that let people vote multiple times and didn't close until after the Cavs had won the series.

Of COURSE people started voting for the Cavs when they went up 1-0, 2-0, 3-0, and then won.

I already got receipts that show that multiple people who dapped or cosigned your initial claim were picking the Hawks themselves.

You claimed that "nobody was picking the Hawks" then you claimed that the "overwhelming majority" were picking the Cavs. Yet the experts poll your own damn side posted had nearly 40% of the experts picking the Hawks, and that was before we even knew Kyrie was out for the series. The Coli poll you keep referencing had 65 votes for the Hawks, and that's even with votes coming in after the Cavs took the lead and won the series. It can't be an "overwhelming majority" if there's 65 people on the other side and a good bunch of the Cavs votes came in after the series started.





I didn't pull up "every single post" that had the Hawks winning, I answered you in less than 10 minutes.

It was that easy to pull dozens of posts with the Hawks winning. People were back and forth from the beginning.

And how can I be "rewriting history" when I have come with direct quotes for every. single. claim. I have made.

You and some of the people supporting you been looking like fools when actual receipts come in. Name one claim I've made that I couldn't back up. One.

Every claim I've made in this thread has been a verifiable fact backed up with receipts. So how could I be rewriting history? That makes you a liar. Negged.

Yeah, because people voting for the Cavs at a significantly higher rate all took place AFTER the series. Sounds plausible. So I guess damn near nobody voted until the Cavs were winning the series according to you, since the Hawks have so little votes and apparently they were the favorites, huh? Stop. This is embarrassing levels of reaching.

So on ONE source (ESPN), the Cavs were ONLY favored by a 20% rate, so that means the Cavs weren't overwhelming favorites (but you want to ignore a poll on here with an overwhelming majority picking the Cavs because you think somehow that no one voted until the series was already in the Cavs favor lmao). Now come up with a source that has the Hawks favored. Or even at a 50/50 split. I'll wait. Oh, while you're at it, find me where people had Boston winning last year or Toronto winning in 2016, since that's what you Bron nuthuggers were initially claiming

Skimming through that thread, the vast majority of the comments had the Cavs winning. Pulling up a few quotes with the Hawks winning (and lumping them in with posts that say shyt like "this series could go either way" ) is reaching. The poll has the Cavs winning by a large margin, the majority of the comments have the Cavs winning. Keep rewriting history though.

Sensitive hoe. Back at you.

 

[GOAT]

Nope...... that’s not true

Kobe street team not gonna derail this and muddy things up. Everything he said was true..... the past few years people thought Bos & Toronto was gonna stop Bron..... I remember them peak Bulls years when Rose was healthy and later Butler was cooking it was “Bron won’t get passed the Bulls”

Every year weeks leading up to the playoff (this year included),

Every time a Lebron team lost or loses a game, there’s soooooooo much commentary on the problems with his team, how he doesn’t have it anymore or how such and such is better than Bron and will beat him in the playoffs.

Every year it’s been the same, not sure how anyone can dispute it

Martha

By looking at the documented evidence that the VAST majority of people picked the Cavs to win every one of those series. Find me sources/polls that had the Celtics, Raptors, or Hawks beating the Cavs.

 

[Sauce Dab]

@Sauce Dab oh my :ThoseReceipts:

Receipts undefeated :ReceiptsOnDeck:

 

[Remote]

It’s hard to take Nick Wright seriously when he’s such an obvious and blatant Lebron stan. Even if he does make a decent point.

This board does a poor job of separating fans from obsessive stans but Wright is clearly the latter.

 

[ajnapoleon]

I can’t belive what I’m reading


Pacers have PG hibbert lance west they not getting past them .... Lebron and his team wins .... east is weak

The raptors for the past 4 years gonna get him... Lebron team wins ...east is weak

Bulls for 3 straight years gonna get him ... Lebron wins ... east is weak

Love gets his arm pulled out it’s socket ... Lebron still beats the cletics ....east is weak

Bulls have a complete team love is gone kyrie have one knee cap ... somehow the cavs win ... the east is weak

Hawks 60 win team (spurs east) and some how after the cavs win they was frauds


This been going on for years and it’s always the east is weak how about this guy knows how to play

 

[SchoolboyC]

Nope...... that’s not true

Kobe street team not gonna derail this and muddy things up. Everything he said was true..... the past few years people thought Bos & Toronto was gonna stop Bron..... I remember them peak Bulls years when Rose was healthy and later Butler was cooking it was “Bron won’t get passed the Bulls”

Every year weeks leading up to the playoff (this year included),

Every time a Lebron team lost or loses a game, there’s soooooooo much commentary on the problems with his team, how he doesn’t have it anymore or how such and such is better than Bron and will beat him in the playoffs.

Every year it’s been the same, not sure how anyone can dispute it

Martha

Y’all really in here trying to rewrite history

 

[Ben.]

@ those false narratives. Nobody had the Hawks beating the Cavs in 2015. Nobody had the Raptors beating them in 2016. Nobody had the Celtics beating them last year. They were the overwhelming favorites in every one of those series. Lebron fans trying to re-write recent history as if we all just forgot or something is honestly hilarious.

Stop, I know for a fact in 2015 dudes was swearing the Cavs were gonna be beat by the Bulls and Hawks after KLove went down and Kyrie was hobbled

Especially with the Bulls who had Rose, Butler, and Pau. SO many ppl thought the Bulls were gonna take that series since they had Jimmy B to slow down LBJ (and he did a pretty good job as a matter of fact), Hawks were a 60 win team with 4 All-Stars and a top 5 defense that year I believe. That 2015 run gets criminally underrated.

 

[letti cook]

chris thinks he's getting girls now cause of his looks..KNEEGROW PLEASE

 

[JesusFOREVER]

@ those false narratives. Nobody had the Hawks beating the Cavs in 2015. Nobody had the Raptors beating them in 2016. Nobody had the Celtics beating them last year. They were the overwhelming favorites in every one of those series. Lebron fans trying to re-write recent history as if we all just forgot or something is honestly hilarious.

BULLLLshyt

 

[Miggs]

Nick Wright is a FOOL and so is anyone who takes his shyt seriously.

All he does is contradict himself over and over...

He keeps saying the regular season doesnt matter until its time to craft his agendas...

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Yeah, because people voting for the Cavs at a significantly higher rate all took place AFTER the series. Sounds plausible. So I guess damn near nobody voted until the Cavs were winning the series according to you, since the Hawks have so little votes and apparently they were the favorites, huh? Stop. This is embarrassing levels of reaching.

I didn't say it all took place after the series, I said it took place over the course of the series, from when they took the 1-0 lead until the final game. That crap happens all the time on The Coli, do you pay attention to anything? Watch any open poll change over the course of the game/series as it gets more and more obvious what the result will be.

And how does what I said translate to "damn near nobody voted?" I'm sure there were well over a hundred votes before the series started. Stop making up stuff.

So on ONE source (ESPN), the Cavs were ONLY favored by a 20% rate, so that means the Cavs weren't overwhelming favorites (but you want to ignore a poll on here with an overwhelming majority picking the Cavs because you think somehow that no one voted until the series was already in the Cavs favor lmao). Now come up with a source that has the Hawks favored. Or even at a 50/50 split. I'll wait.

One source? Pretty much all the sources said the same thing. This is what showed up first on google:

NBA.com net roundup: 20 experts picking Cavs, 13 picking Hawks (they use Kyrie on offense as the lead-in photo, reminding you that people were only picking the Cavs IF they had Kyrie)
Sporting News: 1 picked Cavs, 1 picked Hawks, but the guy who picked Cavs said his main reason was "Irving and James are the two best players in this series"
SB Nation: 4 Cavs, 2 Hawks, but one of the guys to pick Cavs said, "Feels like a coin flip", so just as easy could have been 3-3
Topbet.eu: Picked Cavs in 7, but on the condition: "Cleveland can’t afford Irving to miss any games moving forward, especially against a team like Atlanta."

And note that just about EVERYONE was saying the series would go 6 or 7, and that's with Kyrie coming back rested and somewhat healthy.

So the trend is clear. It was generally seen as a toss-up series, with the toss-up falling about 60-40 in the Cavs favor IF they had Kyrie.

That's what the receipts show.

Now compare that to:

@ those false narratives. Nobody had the Hawks beating the Cavs in 2015....They were the overwhelming favorites in every one of those series. Lebron fans trying to re-write recent history as if we all just forgot or something is honestly hilarious.

Nobody? Just a straight lie, it was a lot of folk. And "overwhelming favorite?" NONE of those sites I listed were calling the Cavs the overwhelming favorite, they all were saying it would be a close series and that's WITH Kyrie on the floor.

Oh, while you're at it, find me where people had Boston winning last year or Toronto winning in 2016, since that's what you Bron nuthuggers were initially claiming

I didn't say one word about that, liar.

Skimming through that thread, the vast majority of the comments had the Cavs winning. Pulling up a few quotes with the Hawks winning

How is 20+ comments and 60+ votes "a few"?

Including some of the guys who were dapping and cosigning you.

Sensitive hoe. Back at you.

I negged you because you lied about me and continued to lie about me.

You claim I was rewriting history, but you can't quote a SINGLE statement I made for which you have a receipt to prove me wrong. Not one.

At least I get the satisfaction of negging you off your 100 rep while you trying to put a dent in 3,000.

Receipts undefeated :ReceiptsOnDeck:

 

[Rekkapryde]

Lebron’s team must pay this nikka an exorbitant amount to get his Mario on. Cuz use to legit shyt on Bron all the time before he took the gig in Houston

Bron got his own bagmen fam