Nikola Jokic vs Anthony Davis

Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
87,465
Reputation
9,746
Daps
236,199
ESPECIALLY with the Murray we’ve seen in the bubble along side him dropping multiple 40 and 50 point games on the way to dropping 27 a night in these playoffs ...the supporting cast of the nuggets is getting severely underrated in this comparison...just kinda writing off the squad as a bunch of also rans lifted by Jokic’s brilliance running the show...they have good offensive pieces, flat out... for all the praise that’s due to him for being as good of a playmaking, table setting center as we’ve seen, the nuggets would likely been out in the first round if not Murray for elevating to the next level...
You acknowledge on the surface that Jokic's runs the show, but you then use Murray and the "severely underrated" role players rising to the occasion, as if they would've performed the same had AD been on the team instead. AD has never shown the ability of running actions from anywhere on the floor; AD has never shown the ability to create plays out of nothing; AD has never shown the ability to operate as the main ball-handler; AD has never shown the ability to manipulate defenses with his play; AD has never shown the ability to keep players constantly engaged and empowered them.

LeBron is legitimately the only one in the league who compares. And nobody would ever entertain the possibility that AD could elevate the play of those around him like he could.

Denver's eFG% with Jokic on the floor - 57%
Denver's eFG% without Jokic on the floor - 44% (which would dead-last out of all playoff teams)
Denver has the lowest contest-shot rate directly off Jokic's passes (open shots he generates) - 12% lower Doncic, and 17% lower than LeBron
Denver has the highest FG% in the paint with Jokic on the floor.

His passing literally creates more open looks than anyone else in the entire league.

He literally transforms what would be one of the worst offensive support casts into being one of the best-performing ones. There's nothing "severely underrated" about the likes of Milsap, Grant, Harris, Morris and Craig, who while bring their own offensive strings to the team's bow, would otherwise be condemned if it wasn't for Jokic setting the table for them. All of Murray's 40/50-point games, and the support cast making timely shots, have Jokic's fingerprints all over them. Murray and the role players can almost exclusively focus on scoring, and not have to worry about facilitating for one another, making sure they all get regular and equal touches, on top of generating open looks for one another. Their chemistry exists because Jokic is the nucleus. That same magic isn't happening with AD in place of him.

It's not too dissimilar to the offensive success the Warriors have had with Steph, with the way he generates open looks for his team (with the gravity he has by teleporting all over the floor) and the selflessness he has by sharing the ball. You can't just drop Dame into that system and expect the same magic to happen. Dame and AD are buckets, but they don't play in a manner that elevates those around them. They'll get their points, but it can be in the run of sacrificing the betterment of the team.
that they had to comeback from 3-1 in the first round against a team they favored against in the first place was largely because Donovan Mitchell looked like a Hall of Famer attacking a Jokic anchored defense in pick and roll...the media was already writing obituaries on Denver’s season, and the overriding narrative was shaping up to be despite how cute of a novelty having a playmaker at center is ... it’s next to impossible to put a contending level defense around one of the league’s biggest pick and roll liabilities....luckily for him and the nuggets, Gorbet has own failings in that regard and Murray was able to match Mitchell in the “let me just drop 50 every night” game
This can not be emphasized more.

Here we have a 2x DPOY and arguably the best interior defender in the league, whose defensive presence and impact was all but a droplet of water on the fire of Murray all throughout that series.

Denver shot 11% greater in PnR, 8% greater from 15ft+ and 14% greater from behind the arc against Gobert in that series. And he only held them to -3% less inside the paint. Now, granted these percentages aren't entirely on Gobert, as they're nuances to how these plays resulted, and who was at fault.

Which brings me to the point of: individual defense being of less importance than team defense.

Irrespective of my belief that Gobert's defense is overrated, he still is a high-graded defender, who even with his abilities and being the defensive anchor, is at the mercy of those around him. If the players around him aren't rotating, communicating, and giving effort, then his contributions on the defensive end are washed out to sea.

Contrary to popular belief, despite Jokic's foibles on that end, he's still an above-average defender: he has great hands (leads all big men in deflections), great in the post, great at disrupting passing lanes, and has high BBIQ of knowing where to be to at least be a deterrence or stopping a play before it unfolds.

Funnily enough, the Nuggets have had one of the better defenses over the last few seasons with Jokic on the floor (non-garbage time). And it's largely down to the fact that all their heavy-play lineups, all have strengths that are pieces to a puzzle, where if 1-2 are missing, as Harris and Barton did in the opening series, it puts a greater strain on everyone else and exposes their flaws. It's no coincidence that the return of Harris has mitigated some of these issues, and consequently led to Jokic being a plus-defender in the Clippers series. Now I think it goes without saying that Denver's defense would be greater, in general, with AD, but whatever lining he'd provide on that end would hit a limit, and wouldn't be nearly enough to make up for the debt they'd end up having on offense, without Jokic.
Head to head, I think this series is gonna illustrate the difference clear as day cause AD is perfect for nullifying the Joker/Murray two man game
I don't doubt that AD is capable of limiting/nullifying their two-man game - he's been the best defensive performer this season. I just don't think that's really going to speak on who's the better player. I mean, after all, AD has the luxury of having Bron standing right next to him.

Which is what I think this series will come down to; the matching of basketball wits between Jokic and LeBron. AD v. Jokic will be nothing more than a subplot.

:manny:
 
Last edited:

Kal El

All Star
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
2,860
Reputation
440
Daps
11,896
Reppin
USA
You acknowledge on the surface that Jokic's runs the show, but you then use Murray and the "severely underrated" role players rising to the occasion, as if they would've performed the same had AD been on the team instead. AD has never shown the ability of running actions from anywhere on the floor; AD has never shown the ability to create plays out of nothing; AD has never shown the ability to operate as the main ball-handler; AD has never shown the ability to manipulate defenses with his play; AD has never shown the ability to keep players constantly engaged and empowered them.

LeBron is legitimately the only one in the league who compares. And nobody would ever entertain the possibility that AD could elevate the play of those around him like he could.

Denver's eFG% with Jokic on the floor - 57%
Denver's eFG% without Jokic on the floor - 44% (which would dead-last out of all playoff teams)
Denver has the lowest contest-shot rate directly off Jokic's passes (open shots he generates) - 12% lower Doncic, and 17% lower than LeBron
Denver has the highest FG% in the paint with Jokic on the floor.

He literally creates more open looks than anyone else in the entire league.

He literally transforms what would be one of the worst offensive support casts into being one of the best-performing ones. There's nothing "severely underrated" about the likes of Milsap, Grant, Harris, Morris and Craig, who while bring their own offensive strings to the team's bow, would otherwise be condemned if it wasn't for Jokic setting the table for them. All of Murray's 40/50-point games, and the support cast making timely shots, have Jokic's fingerprints all over them. Murray and the role players can almost exclusively focus on scoring, and not have to worry about facilitating for one another, making sure they all get regular and equal touches, on top of generating open looks for one another. Their chemistry exists because Jokic is the nucleus. That same magic isn't happening with AD in place of him.

It's not too dissimilar to the offensive success the Warriors have had with Steph, with the way he generates open looks for his team (with the gravity he has by teleporting all over the floor) and the selflessness he has by sharing the ball. You can't just drop Dame into that system and expect the same magic to happen. Dame and AD are buckets, but they don't play in a manner that elevates those around them. They'll get their points, but it can be in the run of sacrificing the betterment of the team.

This can not be emphasized more.

Here we have a 2x DPOY and arguably the best interior defender in the league, whose defensive presence and impact was all but a droplet of water on the fire of Murray all throughout that series.

Denver shot 11% greater in PnR, 8% greater from 15ft+ and 14% greater from behind the arc against Gobert in that series. And he only held them to -3% less inside the paint. Now, granted these percentages aren't entirely on Gobert, as they're nuances to how these plays resulted, and who was at fault.

Which brings me to the point of: individual defense being of less importance than team defense.

Irrespective of my belief that Gobert's defense is overrated, he still is a high-graded defender, who even with his abilities and being the defensive anchor, is at the mercy of those around him. If the players around him aren't rotating, communicating, and giving effort, then his contributions on the defensive end are washed out to sea.

Contrary to popular belief, despite Jokic's foibles on that end, he's still an above-average defender: he has great hands (leads all big men in deflections), great in the post, great at disrupting passing lanes, and has high BBIQ of knowing where to be to at least be a deterrence or stopping a play before it unfolds.

Funnily enough, the Nuggets have had one of the better defenses over the last few seasons with Jokic on the floor (non-garbage time). And it's largely down to the fact that all their heavy-play lineups, all have strengths that are pieces to a puzzle, where if 1-2 are missing, as Harris and Barton did in the opening series, it puts a greater strain on everyone else and exposes their flaws. It's no coincidence that the return of Harris has mitigated some of these issues, and consequently led to Jokic being a plus-defender in the Clippers series. Now I think it goes without saying that Denver's defense would be greater, in general, with AD, but whatever lining he'd provide on that end would hit a limit, and wouldn't be nearly enough to make up for the debt they'd end up having on offense, without Jokic.

I don't doubt that AD is capable of limiting/nullifying their two-man game - he's been the best defensive performer this season. I just don't think that's really going to speak on who's the better player. I mean, after all, AD has the luxury of having Bron standing right next to him.

Which is what I think this series will come down to; the matching of basketball wits between Jokic and LeBron. AD v. Jokic will be nothing more than a subplot.

:manny:
This is too high quality of a post for the Coli.
 

paidNfull

Live By It, Die By It
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
2,023
Reputation
-455
Daps
3,618
Reppin
LouI$I@n@
Jokic is on another offensively and Davis is on another level defensively.
AD dont have any weaknesses in his offensive game tho, all Jokic do is probably pass better, besides that...AD can handle like a point guard, post up, fadeaway, hit the mid range, hit the 3, hes a better paint player, high flyer, catch lobs....wtf wrong with people on here
 

FukkaPaidEmail

Retired Hoodrat whisperer
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
23,507
Reputation
4,228
Daps
90,630
Reppin
The Diaspora
AD dont have any weaknesses in his offensive game tho, all Jokic do is probably pass better, besides that...AD can handle like a point guard, post up, fadeaway, hit the mid range, hit the 3, hes a better paint player, high flyer, catch lobs....wtf wrong with people on here


He runs an entire offense that’s not just passing better :mjlol:


AD could never lift a team like Jokic does .
 

paidNfull

Live By It, Die By It
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
2,023
Reputation
-455
Daps
3,618
Reppin
LouI$I@n@
I barely seen Jokic in that Jazz series, besides a few games, Murray was doing all the work...that's how Jokic look when u have a good Defensive big on him
 

ajnapoleon

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
23,463
Reputation
-1,245
Daps
93,299
Reppin
NULL
Its funny

Now Being able to pass really well is a good thing :russ:



But Anyway ....


The real reason the nuggets got by the clippers is because the Clippers doubled and joker picked them apart


And they had no center that could move with him zubac too green and trezz too small



No he have AD and dwight people forget dwight was a 3 time defense player of the year and he fresh

And Magee those 3 are faster than joker On a fastbreak

And can stay with him


Oh and :lolbron: And rondo can pass too


Imagine if they had bradly still :mjlol:




Its not Gonna be easy but joker not gonna do what he did to the clippers
 
Top