I kinda agree. Depends on the child, everyone aint about that action. Me, I moved out at 25, making 40k (2k a month) a year, more than my retired dad and retail working mother. Rent and utilities was 800. Could I have saved that money by staying with my fam? Sure -- they didn't want or force me to leave. But I had to go. I love my dad and we have zero issues, but if there's going to be a definitive man in the house, it's gonna be me. Being able to watch big booty bytches on xvid without my headphones and having bytches over assed out was my motivation. I destroyed corporate america, wasnt about that retail life.
I wouldnt trade those struggling and fukking in peace years for anything. It made me into the self reliant man I am today. I feel we should encourage our youth to be business minded and about the paper earlier, so by 21, they'd be already hitting the ground running, ready for solid employment and is of great character. If one is financially responsible early, there's no reason why you shouldn't have savings/your paper right and be on your own at 22-25. Anyone who disagrees is just juelzin'. The youth need pressure to be great, not just safety nets.
If you're a man, independence and self reliance is of upmost importance. I'd definitely push my children to work hard and get their own shyt early but I wouldn't force them out at a certain age.
Plus, let's keep it an absolute buck. Alot of those "staying home to save money" nikkas are REALLY just uninspired, lazy, unsuccessful leeches. Women will tell you this shyt. We cannot foster bum or excuses behavior any longer.