plushcarpet
Superstar
yea but that's only thanks to the Soviet Union and Communist China though
Pretend poverty isnt the lowest its ever been brehs
No, Capitalism Will Not “Starve Humanity” by 2050
- Thread starter DEAD7
- Start date
Thats one opinion.
pretend China didnt accept facets of capitalism to lift its people out of extreme poverty brehsplushcarpet
Superstar
but breh, you don't understand there are still poor people! If capitalism worked there would not be a single poor person in the entire world, overnight
plushcarpet
Superstar
meh, you just haven't read karl marx yet
if you read karl marx you'll realize how much better the world would be if the Soviet Union and Communist china ran things
JahFocus CS
Get It How You Get It
meh, you just haven't read karl marx yet
if you read karl marx you'll realize how much better the world would be if the Soviet Union and Communist china ran things
Fail to realize the sarcasm of someone who is in your side in a debate, brehs.
plushcarpet
Superstar
this woulda never happened if USA's capitalism wasn't holding the education system back
cape for degenerative system brehsIts ironic but capitalism is responsible for our shytty education system
plushcarpet
Superstar
look i'm not naive, I know every system has flaws and there's still plenty to improve on in western capitalism
Its ironic but capitalism is responsible for our shytty education system
it's just funny when people attack capitalism but don't accept ANY facts like the ones in OPs article
they also won't accept the fact that their ideology WAS ATTEMPTED and it failed miserably several times, but of course there is always an excuse, yet they give capitalism NO excuse
as for the education system, all the best countries in the world happen to be market economies
look i'm not naive, I know every system has flaws and there's still plenty to improve on in western capitalism
it's just funny when people attack capitalism but don't accept ANY facts like the ones in OPs article
they also won't accept the fact that their ideology WAS ATTEMPTED and it failed miserably several times, but of course there is always an excuse, yet they give capitalism NO excuse
The writer is a moron.
She is attempting to telegraph capitalism on a linear model (everything remains constant) when even Forbes (bourgeoisie literature 101) admitted there are existential risk at play that will most likely the alter the economic landscape
You do realize that Russia, China and many other states that claimed the mantel of Marxism were state capitalist authoritarian states within a decade of existentence....
plushcarpet
Superstar
most writers are idiots, they are trained to write not to analyze advanced economic models
forbes sold out a while ago too, they're irrelevant
however the facts still remain that poverty and hunger is at an all time low and decreasing
and that's why i said attempted the ideology
And how long do you think that will last?