Ill call your bluff. (the above examples below are under the $21 billion environment remediation in the picture above by the way)
Its still not descriptive.
As Example: Sec 11002 , near a billion is going towards Forest Fires, but it doesnt say how it will be spent (employees, trucks).
its just more a detailed break down of saying "this $5 billion will go to schools" but doesnt detail how into schools.
heres a prime example:
Sec 11002
Part 10
$500
million to private forest land owners for implementation of forestry practices on private forest land (actual wording from document)
how could we ever prove that
Also, the picture I posted above, is just a summary of all the math in these documents (almost the last few hundred pages are almost all null, so its not really hard to search though