dantheman9758
All Star

Let's talk about Bill Russell for a moment... William Felton Russell made it to the NBA Finals every single season of his career except once, where he "only" made it 1 round away (to the ECF) to be vanquished by a prime Wilt-"most dominant force ever" -Chamberlain and his record breaking 76ers squad which is one of the greatest squads in NBA history. The only NBA Finals he ever lost, he was injured and on the DNP list. In just 14 years he achieved 11 rings. 2 NCAA titles. 5 MVP's and an Olympic Gold. He anchored every single squad as the best player on his team. He NEVER lost a game 7, and he was in 10 of them... the only MVP's not awarded to him during his career went to Wilt Chamberlain, Bob Pettit or Oscar Robertson. His final two rings he earned on the court when he doubled his duties as both starting center AND HEAD COACH. Even beyond his NBA Accolades, he won 2 NCAA titles with the San Francisco Dons, a team that never made it big in NCAA basketball BEFORE or SINCE Bill played. He won FIFTY FIVE straight games with that squad, and before he was pigeon holed by Red Aurbach into a "defensive/rebounding specialist" for the Celtics his offensive numbers on that squad were 22ppg on 52%. There isn't a single "choking" or "failed to ____" blemish in his entire basketball career. The guy was quite literally almost invincible as the last-man-standing during any season or tournament he ever competed in.
Let that sink in to the Lebron stans, Kobe stans and Jordan stans out there that have a bad habit of fixating on just those 3 in "GOAT" discussions. I'm not talking about the typical fans of those players that have some history sense I'm talking about the stans, the ones who insist their man is, or will be the "undisputed GOAT" and then proceed to dump a resume riddled with holes in terms of failing to even make it to the Finals let alone winning them. Every single other super star player including those 3 guys in NBA history have LOST more seasons than they won - except for Bill Russell. Isn't winning the ultimate goal in basketball? And isn't it that if you win as the best player on your team, and you win as often as Bill Russell, you basically are THE measuring stick for basketball greatness?... Aren't "scoring titles" and all those little accolades basically trivial or even pointless in light of the ultimate goal of the game? At times Jordan and Lebron couldn't even crack a winning record or make it out of the first round - yet Bill Russell sonned Wilt Chamberlain over and over at a time when he played him 142 times during his 13 season pro career. For the record, Kobe has only faced off against greats like Tim Duncan, Lebron James, and Michael Jordan a COMBINED 74 times in his 16 season career. Basically half that amount.
The meat and potatoes of this guys resume literally son's the sh*t outta everyone who's ever played. The ultimate goal in basketball is to win, period. Half the "awards" people boast about that Jordan/Lebron/Kobe earned DIDN'T EVEN EXIST in Russell's time. Bill Russell just won, - as the best man on the floor, the only way he knew how - period. His defensive and cerebral impact on the game was so substantial it didn't even matter how many points he had on a stat sheet - he made personal points scored and numbers not matter. Today's NBA Finals award bears his name. Nobody else can even win a title anymore without Russell looming over their shoulder with HIS name inscribed on the trophy. Most of these cats ultimate goal is getting "a" ring (singular).... So even their ultimate goal is nothing but a fraction of what he accomplished.


Here's a glimpse at how profound his defense was:
Celtic DRtg
1957 - 6/8 (+1.5) <---- No Russell
1958 - 1/8 (-5.2)
1959 - 1/8 (-5.8)
1960 - 1/8 (-6.2)
1961 - 1/8 (-8.2)
1962 - 1/8 (-8.7)
1963 - 1/9 (-9.1)
1964 - 1/9 (-11.5)
1965 - 1/9 (-9.9)
1966 - 1/9 (-7.1)
1967 - 1/10 (-4.9)
1968 - 2/12 (-4.6)
1969 - 1/14 (-6.8)
1970 - 7/16 (+0.6) <---- No Russell
And his HOF Celtic teammates that handled much of the scoring? Yah, for 3 seasons of his career the Celtics were actually the WORST offensive team in the league... He still won a title all 3 of those seasons - the only teams to have ever done that in NBA history. The Celtics were a consistently unimpressive, to flat out terrible offensive squad, yet they still DOMINATED strictly because of the presence of Bill Russell anchoring defense:
Russell's Celtic team's ORtgs:
1957 87.2 (5th of 8)
1958 85.5 (7th of 8)
1959 88.3 (5th of 8)
1960 90.2 (5th of 8)
1961 87.5 (8th of 8)
1962 91.6 (7th of 9)
1963 92.6 (9th of 9)
1964 89.3 (9th of 9)
1965 - 92.9 (7th of 9)
1966 91.7 (8th of 9)
1967 97.7 (4th of 10)
1968 95.8 (8th of 12)
1969 93.2 (9th of 12)
Just listen to the man talk:
Got to be one of the most cerebral, and all too often misunderstood players of all time. He's not a player with flashy moves, nor was he a player with gawdy offensive stats. He just dominated in any way possible to get his team a win. Period. Bill Russell is the ultimate measuring stick for basketball greatness.
Last edited by a moderator: