I think that the same thing is done in London or Paris or Barcelona...I can't remember which one but it worked for what they were trying to accomplish
London is planning on doing something similar IIRC
I think that the same thing is done in London or Paris or Barcelona...I can't remember which one but it worked for what they were trying to accomplish
They already are but they are doing it in a different way, in zones during peak rush hour/working hours.London is planning on doing something similar IIRC
They already are but they are doing it in a different way, in zones during peak rush hour/working hours.
They already are but they are doing it in a different way, in zones during peak rush hour/working hours.
Are they trying to get cars off the street
They need to build more stations in the other boroughs then.That's their goal.
This will make more people take subway which is not even able to function properly with declining ridership. MTA already announced that even with price increases they will decrease serviceThey need to build more stations in the other boroughs then.
Yup. Funny cuz i just watched a piracy show set in 1700s where when they went ti america they were bytching abiut all the taxes and tariffs they had to pay just to enter the harbor to do busjness. Wars been fought for less.I drive into NYC everyday. I have a company truck. Do this and it will put an extra $8.8K a month in expenses for the already small company I work for ($25/day x 16 mechanics = $400/day x 22 working days a month =$8.8K).
This is what the climate change con is all about though. Hurting small business, and ultimately crushing humanity in general. But yall dumb n!ggas think its real.
thats honestly what i was curious about, if they're shooting for less traffic or more revenue by designThis will make more people take subway