NYT Obtains Trump's Tax Returns From...1995

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
93,995
Reputation
3,915
Daps
167,515
Reppin
Brooklyn
Following Trump tax revelations, voters in Toledo question his business acumen

A report in the New York Times says a $916 million loss in the '90s might have allowed Donald Trump to legally avoid paying any income taxes for almost two decades. (Sarah Parnass/The Washington Post)
By David Weigel and Jenna Johnson October 2 at 7:54 PM
TOLEDO — John Gillespie dug into his omelet with one hand and flipped through the Toledo Blade with the other. The news that Donald Trump had declared a $916 million loss in his 1995 tax return, and may have avoided paying income taxes for as many as 18 years, had made it to the front page of the local newspaper. Gillespie, 52, struggled to make sense of it.

“This was in 1995?” he asked, looking up from the diner counter. “This was during an economic upturn — and he managed to lose $916 million?” The tool and die maker, who had voted for Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont in the Democratic primary, started to laugh. “That tells me a lot about his economic skills.”

The story, first published by the New York Times late Saturday and not denied by a flustered Trump campaign, represented a piece of a holy grail that Hillary Clinton had sought for months. The Democratic nominee, who is making her first campaign stop in this city on Monday, has struggled to convince many traditionally Democratic voters that outwardly successful Trump is not to be trusted and poses a threat to their livelihoods.

The revelations about the Republican nominee’s taxes gave Clinton a fresh opportunity. In conversations around Toledo, many voters said they were offended by Trump.

“It’s disgusting,” said Steve Crouse, 65, the owner of Toledo’s downtown Glass City Cafe and a separate printing business. “As a businessman, he’s got that right to do that. It’s the way the laws were set up. But it’s not right. I would feel guilty if I didn’t pay anything. It’s flat-out cheating the government. You’re using all the roads, the fire department, the police, so you should pay for that.”

The GOP presidential nominee is out on the trail ahead of the general election in November.
On his way into church, at the suburban parish he shares with Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), Fred Glynn, 63, said that Clinton’s support of abortion rights made her impossible to accept. But the tax story, which he had just seen on CNN, added to the reasons he would have to reject Trump.

“How can he not pay income taxes?” he asked. “He talks about helping people, but he doesn’t pay income tax? That’s helping everybody. It’s like the situation in Florida, where he didn’t pay taxes on his golf course. The school suffered from that.”

[Trump campaign reels after disclosure of 1995 tax returns]

Toledo, like the rest of surrounding Lucas County, is just one of many communities where Clinton was struggling to pull back loyal Democrats from Trump. The Republican nominee had visited the city twice, even filling the city’s largest arena at a rally after the Republican National Convention. At every stop, as in the primary he lost here to Gov. John Kasich (R-Ohio), and as in the first televised debate, he decried the North American Free Trade Agreement for “killing our jobs” and promised to use tariffs and tough negotiations to jawbone trade partners into submission.

Democrats watched with horror as the message seemed to sink in. In 2012, President Obama won Lucas County in a two-to-one rout, netting 66,676 votes here on his way to a far narrower statewide victory margin of 166,272. This year, just 57,846 total votes were cast in the tough, contested primary between Clinton and Sanders. The same day, 52,350 votes were cast in the county’s Republican primary. Since 2008, the Democratic primary vote had tumbled by 40 percent; since 2012, the Republican vote had doubled.

Separating Trump from his rhetoric by casting him as a dishonest and bumbling tyc00n had been key to Clinton’s fight back, but for months, it didn’t penetrate. A TV spot that showed David Letterman revealing the China labels on Trump’s branded clothing didn’t move poll numbers. Clinton got little lift from a rally at the failed Trump Taj Mahal casino at Atlantic City.

“He built up his wealth by stiffing small businesses and contractors,” Clinton said last month in a video address to the Laborers’ International Union of North America. “My dad was a small-business man. I’m just happy he never did business with Trump.”

Watch Trump’s surrogates defend his handling of tax laws

Play Video1:29

Former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie say Trump’s handling of tax laws is “genius.” (The Washington Post)
News coverage of that speech — and Trump’s mockery of it — focused not on that line, but on the loud and harried way Clinton said “You might ask, why am I not 50 points ahead?” And last week, a Fox News poll otherwise stuffed with good news for Clinton found that just 46 percent of voters were bothered by Trump’s refusal to release tax returns, while 60 percent were bothered by the saga of Clinton’s private email server.

If Clinton’s campaign saw Sunday as a turning point, Trump’s most devoted supporters weren’t going along with it.

“He’s a businessman, and he has lawyers,” said Jane Pisano, 86, shrugging as she walked into Sunday Mass. “What bothers me more are the lies that Hillary has told. He didn’t do anything to hurt our nation. She did, and she continues to do so.”

One state over, at the crowded Pennsylvania rally that Trump held as the story broke, his fans offered similar spin. “Diamond” Mike Allen, a 55-year-old Trump supporter living in southeastern Pennsylvania, said it was absurd that someone leaked Trump’s tax returns. Whoever did it, he said, should be sued — and the revelations had not dented his view of Trump.

“I want somebody who knows the loopholes,” said Allen, a former wrestler who now does stand-up comedy. “I love it. That’s the guy I want for president. If it was done legally, he deserves that, his employees deserve that. My hat’s off to him.”

Allen said that he paid federal income tax every year and that he always felt “ripped off.” The government, he said, doesn’t spend his money as carefully as he would. And he would rather that the wealthy pay their fair share through a flat tax, so he hoped that Trump would win the election and end special tax breaks.

“Who better to close that system down than him?” Allen asked. “I have total faith in him.”

Sixteen Republican rivals had watched Trump coast on that argument and trounce them in the primaries. But four years earlier, Democrats had held down Mitt Romney’s support with working-class, white voters by branding him early and often as a plutocrat. Priorities USA, the cash-rich pro-Clinton super PAC that supported Obama that year, had made mini-celebrities out of workers who blamed Romney for lost jobs. The super PAC is on the air in Ohio now with the sort of spot that worked, showing contractors who say they were cheated by Trump in New Jersey.


And the tax returns gave Clinton an argument that would not have worked against Romney: that Trump’s swagger covered up a record of business failure. In the 24 hours since the tax leak, the $916 million loss has proven the toughest aspect for Republicans to spin.

“He ain’t that good,” said Alex Pickett, 52, while waiting for a bus that would take him to a downtown church. “Can’t be that good if he lost that much money.”

On Sunday afternoon, at a bar near Toledo’s resilient Chrysler complex, the size of Trump’s loss was a punch line. As the Cleveland Browns blew a game against the Redskins, Ron Amborski, 57, marveled at what he had just seen on Sunday talk shows.

“Rudy Giuliani called Trump a genius at least 12 times,” Amborski said. “Talk about overcompensating. ‘He’s a genius businessman! He made a genius comeback!’ I thought, ‘Man, if this was a drinking game, I’d be hammered.’ ”



Following Trump tax revelations, voters in Toledo question his business acumen

Sad!
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
93,995
Reputation
3,915
Daps
167,515
Reppin
Brooklyn
As Trump Rails Against Clinton Foundation, Report Finds His Own Charity Is Operating Illegally

By Margaret Hartmannhard to pay attention during debate prep, but when it comes to attacks on Hillary Clinton that are likely to backfire, the man is laser-focused. This week, Trump has been pushing a new attack line regarding the Clinton Foundation, saying, “With her it’s about ‘follow the money.’ Remember that phrase.” Meanwhile, a new report from the Washington Post’s David Fahrenthold — who has been doggedly “following the money” flowing through the Donald J. Trump Foundation for months — says that the charity does not even have the certification required to legally solicit donations in New York.

Earlier this month, New York Attorney General Eric Schneidermanconfirmed that he has opened an investigation into the Trump Foundation “to make sure it’s complying with the laws governing charities in New York.” Now, Fahrenthold reports that the Trump Foundation never obtained the state registration required in New York for any charity that solicits more than $25,000 per year.

A spokesman for Schneiderman confirmed that the Trump Foundation is not registered, but would not comment whether that’s part of its ongoing investigation. (In a separate report released Thursday, a lawyer for the town of Palm Beach, Florida confirmed that Schneiderman’s office has asked for documents related to Trump using foundation money to settle a legal dispute with the town, which may amount to illegal self-dealing.)

If Schneiderman finds that the Trump Foundation is soliciting donations though it isn’t registered, the attorney general could order the charity to halt its fundraising efforts, and seek a court order to make Trump to return the donations he’s already collected.

Hillary Clinton Can’t Let Donald Trump Win the Corruption Issue
Why Trump’s Foundation Should Be a Bigger Scandal Than Clinton’s
It shouldn’t be too hard for Schneiderman to make his case, thanks to Fahrenthold’s previous reporting. The New York law that applies to large charities, called “7A,” defines “solicit” broadly, saying it means “to directly or indirectly make a request for a contribution, whether express or implied, through any medium.”

Tax documents show that in the past 10 years the Trump Foundation has raised more than $25,000 from outside donors (in fact, Trump stopped donating to his charity after 2008). And to cite just two examples that would appear to constitute “soliciting” donations, Trump directed Comedy Central to donate the $400,000 appearance fee for his 2011 TV “roast” to his foundation, and when he skipped a primary debate and held a televised fundraiser for veterans instead, the $1.6 million collected went to the Trump Foundation.

It’s surprising that a sophisticated businessman such as Trump wouldn’t know that his charity needs to be registered — particularly because the Eric Trump Foundation, which uses the same accountant, filed the necessary paperwork. Failing to register isn’t just an insignificant clerical error. Since the foundation wasn’t registered, the state did not require an independent annual audit that might have discovered charity funds were being handled improperly — like, for instance, to personally benefit the man running the foundation.


Report Finds Trump’s Foundation May Be Operating Illegally


Sad!
 

JJ Lions

All Star
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
2,652
Reputation
-233
Daps
6,498
Reppin
NULL
They might have more. The Times reporter when asked didn't say no when asked if that was it and kind of smiled. Maybe they're waiting for some more Clinton leaks, then release it to counter and bury it. Maybe they were hoping for Trump to say he did pay taxes, then release it proving otherwise. So far he hasn't denied it any of it, so it's probably true.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
93,995
Reputation
3,915
Daps
167,515
Reppin
Brooklyn
IS DONALD TRUMP A “GENIUS” TAX AVOIDER?
By John Cassidy
, OCTOBER 2, 2016

The Trump campaign is trying to spin recently exposed sections of Donald Trump’s 1995 tax returns as evidence of his genius, but what the documents reveal is certainly not mental acuity.

said when the show’s host, Chuck Todd, asked him about the New York Times’s revelation that Trump, back in 1995, reported more than nine hundred million dollars in losses on his tax returns, which might well have shielded him from federal income taxes for years. “He did something we admire in America: he came back.” Far from being regarded as a tax avoider, Giuliani insisted, Trump was to be compared to Steve Jobs and Winston Churchill, both of whom suffered setbacks only to return in triumph. “Great men have big failures and then they take those failures, and they turn them into great results,” he said.

The Times’s story, published Saturday, was based upon portions of Trump’s state tax returns for 1995, which someone mailed to the paper. That year, the returns showed, Trump declared that his “federal adjusted gross income”—that means his income adjusted for business losses and other deductions—was minus $915,729,293.

Thanks to various official filings and the efforts of a number of news organizations, it had already been documented that Trump didn’t pay any income tax in 1978, 1979, 1992, and 1994. Given the new revelation of the huge losses he declared in 1995, all of which could be offset against his taxable income, it is entirely reasonable to presume that he didn’t pay any income taxes for many years that followed. Indeed, it is entirely conceivable that Trump hasn’t paid any income taxes at all for more than two decades—a possibility that Hillary Clinton raised in last week’s Presidential debate, and which various journalists, myself included, have been speculating about.

Rather than seeking to dispel the impression that Trump hasn’t paid a cent of income tax, Giuliani on Sunday sought to highlight the fact that Trump’s businesses had paid other types of taxes, such as payroll taxes, property taxes, and sales taxes. This is now the official Trump line. A few nights ago, I appeared on CNN with one of Trump’s economic advisers, Howard Lorber, and he made the same argument. So did the Trump campaign itself, in a statement issued to the Times. “Mr. Trump is a highly-skilled businessman who has a fiduciary responsibility to his business, his family and his employees to pay no more tax than legally required,” the statement said. “That being said, Mr. Trump has paid hundreds of millions of dollars in property taxes, sales and excise taxes, real estate taxes, city taxes, state taxes, employee taxes and federal taxes.”

This is a diversionary argument, of course. Virtually all businesses pay taxes, and those taxes have nothing to do with the personal tax liabilities of their founders and top executives. Should Bill Gates pay no income tax because Microsoft employs more than a hundred thousand people and pays part of their payroll taxes? Should Warren Buffett pay no income tax because his holding company, Berkshire Hathaway, has businesses all over America that pay local taxes? Should Oracle chairman Larry Ellison pay no income taxes because the property taxes on his estate in Woodside, California, are reportedlyeight hundred thousand dollars a year?

Trump’s personal tax affairs stand on their own, and he’ll have to defend them as such. As he has repeatedly said that he gets audited virtually every year, we can probably assume that the I.R.S. has looked into the huge losses he claimed to have racked up in 1995 and found them to be genuine. That wouldn’t be surprising. During the early nineteen-nineties, as the Times article reminded us on Saturday, many of Trump’s businesses “were hemorrhaging money. . . . The Trump Taj Mahal casino reported a $25.5 million net loss during its first six months of 1990; the Trump’s Castle casino lost $43.5 million for the year. His airline, Trump Shuttle, lost $34.5 million during just the first six months of that year.”

None of this is to say that Trump broke any laws. The scandal, instead, is what he was able to do lawfully thanks to the structure of the tax code, and his subsequent failure to be transparent about it. If a source hadn’t sent the 1995 tax documents to the Times, Trump would almost certainly have continued to refuse to release his tax returns, and stuck to the fiction that even if he did release them, they wouldn’t tell us much anyway.

Even now, he might seek to brazen it out. But his campaign is also trying out the “genius” line, to see if it gets any traction. If it does—if Trump’s supporters react to the new revelations with admiration rather than outrage—Trump might well go ahead and release at least some of his tax returns. That is what some of his associates have been advising him to do for weeks.

The problem with this strategy should be obvious. Far from demonstrating that Trump is a “genius” or a “highly-skilled businessman,” the 1995 returns confirm what longtime observers have known for years: earlier in his career, at least, Trump was a terrible businessman. He borrowed billions of dollars to build casinos and buy overpriced trophy properties, such as the Plaza Hotel and the Eastern Air Lines Shuttle. His businesses lost almost all of this money, and some of the biggest ones, including the Plaza, were forced to seek bankruptcy protection. Trump personally was only saved from the humiliation of being declared bust by the fact that his bankers believed they would get more of their money back by throwing him a lifeline.

That’s what they did, and Trump slowly rehabilitated himself. But his comeback was due less to any innate entrepreneurial talent than to a recovery in the property market and his ability to sell himself as a success story despite his financial problems. Indeed, Trump’s real skill has always been as a self-promoter and flimflam man rather than as a creator of successful companies. To compare him to Steve Jobs is a joke, and to compare him to Churchill is perhaps the topper.

Long before he became Prime Minister, the young Churchill was a key proponent of the “People’s Budget” of 1909, in which the great liberal politician David Lloyd George, who was Chancellor of the Exchequer at the time, introduced unprecedented levies on the wealthy into Britain’s tax code. Conservative contemporaries dubbed Lloyd George and Churchill, whom they regarded as dangerous radicals, the “Terrible Twins.”

Trump claims to be a populist and man of the people, but the claim is getting hollower by the day. In the course of his business career, he has stiffed suppliers, reneged on debts, operated a sham university that charged people of moderate means tens of thousands of dollars, given away little or nothing to charity, and—now we know this all but for sure—exploited loopholes in the tax code to get out of paying any income taxes. Yes, it takes a certain kind of talent to get as far as Trump has with that sort of record. But it certainly isn’t the genius that Giuliani was referring to.
Is Donald Trump a “Genius” Tax Avoider? - The New Yorker
 

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

I’m here for the scraps
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
33,793
Reputation
10,069
Daps
111,664
Reppin
Brooklyn
:mjlol:

nikkas In here actually acting like they don't take every step possible to minimize the amount to taxes they pay. The nikka played the game and won. I'm not mad at him,it is smart. Be mad at the nikka who was running the country in '95.

I hate this election :francis:
How many of us are running for president and bashing the people who don't pay them while bragging about how we don't?
 

FukkaPaidEmail

Retired Hoodrat whisperer
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
24,354
Reputation
4,585
Daps
93,888
Reppin
The Diaspora
How many of us are running for president and bashing the people who don't pay them while bragging about how we don't?

I'm not going to be outraged about a nikka not paying taxes especially when the alternative is a woman directly responsible for nikkas dying. They're both full of shyt.

Keep it 100 ...99 percent of us would do the same damn thing as Trump if we were able to pull it off. There are a lot of shyt to be mad at regarding this election but this shyt ain't one.
 

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

I’m here for the scraps
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
33,793
Reputation
10,069
Daps
111,664
Reppin
Brooklyn
I'm not going to be outraged about a nikka not paying taxes especially when the alternative is a woman directly responsible for nikkas dying. They're both full of shyt.

Keep it 100 ...99 percent of us would do the same damn thing as Trump if we were able to pull it off. There are a lot of shyt to be mad at regarding this election but this shyt ain't one.
So are you choosing to ignore his potential pedo tendencies, his potential multiple rapes, his admiration of fascism and foreign tyrants and his unapologetic racism?
 

DonFrancisco

Your Favorite Tio!
Joined
May 3, 2013
Messages
1,389
Reputation
420
Daps
3,105
Reppin
Sabado Gigante
How about we ask how Hillary has made over 200 million in like 7 years without an actual job other than the Clinton Foundation and speeches to wall st

That's legal too. Shout to the hospital industry for using foundations to skirt taxes and generate income
 

无名的

Superstar
Joined
Nov 2, 2013
Messages
5,611
Reputation
1,341
Daps
15,012
:mjlol:

nikkas In here actually acting like they don't take every step possible to minimize the amount to taxes they pay. The nikka played the game and won. I'm not mad at him,it is smart. Be mad at the nikka who was running the country in '95.

I hate this election :francis:

I'm sure there are a lot of posters on here that say to themselves, "Although I am eligible for the Earned Income Credit, I will not claim it because our government needs more money."
 
Top