Allowing people to flood in with no legal way to earn a living once they are here sounds like a winning strategy. What could possibly go wrong.
NYTimes admits. Immigration at the border is a huge problem and needs to be fixed ASAP.
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
is this trump talking???
Imagine thinking the NYT has any semblance of the truth, brehs.
After the NYT has spent the last four years trying to normalize Nazis and the alt-right, of course they put out this shyt.
The issue is the US keeps going on neo-imperialist crusades that turn foreign democracies into authoritarian dictatorships. That was the Reagan doctrine. 30 years later we’re dealing with the global repercussions of neoconservative foreign policies. It’s all part of their game. They create problems then pass the blames onto non-whites.
Because economics.
Its not a physical space issue. Its an economic issue.
Legal immigration is already regulated and accounted for. we now have millions of unaccounted people literally putting direct strain on our resources.
I’m convinced none of you, even naps dumb ass even read the article.
Y’all just took the opportunity to run in here and repeat the same dumb ass shyt you do in every thread about immigration.
The article isn’t talking about immigrants taking jobs, building walls or any of that dumb shyt.
The “crisis” is America’s inability to process all the people that are coming. It’s literally talking about the immigration system itself, not the effects of walls or prosecuting employers
As with most of our government functions our immigration system is slow, stupid and expensive, and you dummies and our government are usually stuck arguing over dumb shyt, that has nothing to do with solving the problem.
Y’all just took the opportunity to run in here and repeat the same dumb ass shyt you do in every thread about immigration.
The article isn’t talking about immigrants taking jobs, building walls or any of that dumb shyt.
The “crisis” is America’s inability to process all the people that are coming. It’s literally talking about the immigration system itself, not the effects of walls or prosecuting employers
As with most of our government functions our immigration system is slow, stupid and expensive, and you dummies and our government are usually stuck arguing over dumb shyt, that has nothing to do with solving the problem.
Last edited:
Hood Critic
The Power Circle
I have always wondered what would happen if large corporations brought the cheap manufacturing labor back to the US from Asia and abroad, specifically built plants and sustainment settlements in the deserts of Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, etc. Employed immigrants in fixed wage jobs producing products and parts as part of US consumerism.
Requirements would be:
- Registered quasi-citizenship upon medical screening and international criminal database verification.
- They would pay a 30-40% tax rate to supplement no income tax filing, to finance a generic-medicare like program for health and basic infrastructure needs within their zone/state.
- They would be responsible for their own children's schooling and no child born within the first 5 years of quasi-citizenship would receive full-citizenship, only quasi-citizenship.
- Misdemeanor crimes would carry a 2-year ban and deportation, requiring a re-application process. While felony crimes would require deportation and a life-long ban.
- Full citizenship would require a minimum of 5 years of good standing in quasi-citizenship and then the normal citizenship process.
This would not solve the problem but it would:
- Incentivize a path to legal citizenship while accounting for a great deal of immigrants through a documented process.
- Bring a lot of corporate money back stateside, it would require a tax incentive for corporations but that could be offset by an increase in consumer purchases spurred by a drop in the price of said good due to the money save on logistics of parts and products being assembled here at home.
- Would inject money into the overall US economy.
- Give the US another avenue to partner and profit with Mexico in the construction and development of larger intake centers on the US/Mexico boarder.
- The intake process, facility, security and services within immigrant zones would provide job opportunities to US citizens as well as a career path for immigrants who stay the course.
- Gives those who are hawkish on immigration the ammunition to slow and stagger immigration intake, take harsher action on illegal immigration and redirect certain foreign aid back to direct benefit of the country.
- Delayed citizenship allows a controlled flow of new citizens into the economy and country as a whole.
- Inadvertently takes away from businesses in the practice of employing illegal immigrants since immigrants can earn a better wage and not have to risk deportation.
Requirements would be:
- Registered quasi-citizenship upon medical screening and international criminal database verification.
- They would pay a 30-40% tax rate to supplement no income tax filing, to finance a generic-medicare like program for health and basic infrastructure needs within their zone/state.
- They would be responsible for their own children's schooling and no child born within the first 5 years of quasi-citizenship would receive full-citizenship, only quasi-citizenship.
- Misdemeanor crimes would carry a 2-year ban and deportation, requiring a re-application process. While felony crimes would require deportation and a life-long ban.
- Full citizenship would require a minimum of 5 years of good standing in quasi-citizenship and then the normal citizenship process.
This would not solve the problem but it would:
- Incentivize a path to legal citizenship while accounting for a great deal of immigrants through a documented process.
- Bring a lot of corporate money back stateside, it would require a tax incentive for corporations but that could be offset by an increase in consumer purchases spurred by a drop in the price of said good due to the money save on logistics of parts and products being assembled here at home.
- Would inject money into the overall US economy.
- Give the US another avenue to partner and profit with Mexico in the construction and development of larger intake centers on the US/Mexico boarder.
- The intake process, facility, security and services within immigrant zones would provide job opportunities to US citizens as well as a career path for immigrants who stay the course.
- Gives those who are hawkish on immigration the ammunition to slow and stagger immigration intake, take harsher action on illegal immigration and redirect certain foreign aid back to direct benefit of the country.
- Delayed citizenship allows a controlled flow of new citizens into the economy and country as a whole.
- Inadvertently takes away from businesses in the practice of employing illegal immigrants since immigrants can earn a better wage and not have to risk deportation.
I'm black as hell.
But saying illegal immigration has gone up due to Trump's ineffective policy isn't caping for illegal immigrants.
But if you want smoke, I can give it to you.
This thread has been since early this morning and it appears me and @MeachTheMonster are the only people who actually read it.
#lowerlearning
#lowerlearning
Reducing the incentive for illegal immigration to the states by going after employers is one liberal solution thats touted often.
It would reduce the strain on the system no?
fukkReducing the incentive for illegal immigration to the states by going after employers is one liberal solution thats touted often.
Why didn't you just say this instead of broadly saying they have nothing to bring? And you don't get it? SMH. This is why people don't take you seriously. Constantly talkin wreckless, only to backtrack a few posts later.
i need to state rhetorical facts now? is there anyone who DOESNT think there are both positives and negatives to people coming here illegally?
so america faces more people than it can handle, applying for asylum or trying to get in illegallyThe “crisis” is America’s inability to process all the people that are coming. It’s literally talking about the immigration system itself, not the effects of walls or prosecuting employers
As with most of our government functions our immigration system is slow, stupid and expensive, and you dummies and our government are usually stuck arguing over dumb shyt, that has nothing to do with solving the problem.
that's not this country's fukkin fault
how many people are we "expected" to cater to who show up at our border?
is there anyone who DOESNT think there are both positives and negatives to people coming here illegally?
Apparently YOU didn't at 8:50 this morning.
If you're gonna say some dumb shyt, don't be hurt when someone points it out.
As many as we need to if we want secure borders.so america faces more people than it can handle, applying for asylum or trying to get in illegally
that's not this country's fukkin fault