Obama Approval Reaches 60%

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Superstar
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
6,541
Reputation
135
Daps
15,960
And these are the same polls that had Hillary destroying Trump in the election:mjlol:

Anybody still believing that fake news is slowwwwww

Yep...same exact polls that said:
  1. That Obama was going to beat McCain
  2. That Obama was going to beat Romney
  3. And that Hillary would beat Trump in the popular vote
Pretty damn accurate for the most part.
 

Dwog

Banned
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
125
Reputation
-50
Daps
447
Reppin
Europe
:hubie:Not even American but I liked him, going to be enjoyable watching the world burn when he's gone, he'll look even better when he gets compared to Trump:manny:
 

Dr. Acula

Posts on Dapcity.com
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
27,049
Reputation
9,422
Daps
144,764
america is no better than it was in 2008 when bush left office at a 30% approval rating, plus we've started 2 new wars?

raw
 

Dr. Acula

Posts on Dapcity.com
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
27,049
Reputation
9,422
Daps
144,764
And these are the same polls that had Hillary destroying Trump in the election:mjlol:

Anybody still believing that fake news is slowwwwww
Let me explain the idea of probability to you.

Lets take 538 which is a favorite. They gave Hillary a 65-70% chance of winning if I remember correctly. So that means that if you flipped a coin 10 times and called tails, there is a 6-7 out of ten chance it will land on tails. Now it doesn't mean that during that specific sequence of ten flips you will get 6-7 out of ten. During one sequence you may get 8 out of ten while in another you may get 4 out of 10. However, if you were to take many sequences and tease out the data, you'll get 6-7 out of 10 more times than not.

This does not mean you will never get heads if you called tails. In this case, we got heads when tails was being called.

To go on about 538 a bit more, they got some shyt after the election but they were the only people who made the claim based on their models that there was a chance Hillary would lose the Election but win the popular vote.

Here is an article they wrote on Nov 1st.

The Odds Of An Electoral College-Popular Vote Split Are Increasing

Also should mention that near the end of the race, Hillary was only leading by 2-5 points in a lot of polls which for a lot of polls was within margin of error and this was national polls. However in the states she lost, the race was well within margin of error more so than the national polls. Also her popular vote lead is very close to the national poll point leads.

In short, a lot of polls weren't "wrong" because they weren't making predictions. They were providing statistical likelihoods.
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
51,421
Reputation
5,343
Daps
115,998
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
Given the state of the healthcare system in the country...his obsession with TPP...his silence on the increasing violent crimes against African Americans...and the national deficit I don't see how his approval rating is so high...That charisma goes a long way I guess :wow:

CNN Polling = Soulja Boy Gangsta Tales
 
Joined
Apr 11, 2014
Messages
5,694
Reputation
-1,421
Daps
14,302
Let me explain the idea of probability to you.

Lets take 538 which is a favorite. They gave Hillary a 65-70% chance of winning if I remember correctly. So that means that if you flipped a coin 10 times and called tails, there is a 6-7 out of ten chance it will land on tails. Now it doesn't mean that during that specific sequence of ten flips you will get 6-7 out of ten. During one sequence you may get 8 out of ten while in another you may get 4 out of 10. However, if you were to take many sequences and tease out the data, you'll get 6-7 out of 10 more times than not.

This does not mean you will never get heads if you called tails. In this case, we got heads when tails was being called.

To go on about 538 a bit more, they got some shyt after the election but they were the only people who made the claim based on their models that there was a chance Hillary would lose the Election but win the popular vote.

Here is an article they wrote on Nov 1st.

The Odds Of An Electoral College-Popular Vote Split Are Increasing

Also should mention that near the end of the race, Hillary was only leading by 2-5 points in a lot of polls which for a lot of polls was within margin of error and this was national polls. However in the states she lost, the race was well within margin of error more so than the national polls. Also her popular vote lead is very close to the national poll point leads.

In short, a lot of polls weren't "wrong" because they weren't making predictions. They were providing statistical likelihoods.

Let me explain something to you. I didn't read any of that bullshyt wall of text:mjlol:
 
Top