OBAMA TOOK PICS WITH FARRAKHAN IN 2005!

Unemployed GM

All Star
Joined
Mar 3, 2015
Messages
1,639
Reputation
80
Daps
3,245
Personally I would have to ask why this is a post?

Obama rode 2 terms back to back pissing white folks off and with a HELL of a middle name.

Yeah he took pics with Farrakhan and if I had the chance to take a pic with that man I would in a instant.
You don’t understand
breh, Obama was a Chicago politician prior being the president
Chicago is Farrakahns main home city of operation
its not that shocking that at some point in his career, a chicago politician would cross paths with a prominent chicago religious leader :mjlol:

nobody would bat an eye if it was some other politician in that photo
like Trump or GW Bush

fukk outta here
You don’t understand. If the picture came out into 2007, Obama would’ve never become president. Hillary Clinton would’ve use that picture to bury him.
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
58,861
Reputation
16,307
Daps
214,722
Reppin
Above the fray.
original article that broke the story

Photo of Sen. Barack Obama with Minister Louis Farrakhan surfaces – Northstar News Today

Photo of Sen. Barack Obama with Minister Louis Farrakhan surfaces
January 20, 2018 1:35 PM·Views: 2681

Minister-1024x705.jpg

Then U.S. Senator Barack Obama with Minister Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam at a 2005 Congressional Black Caucus meeting. Photo by Askia Muhammad.

By Hazel Trice Edney

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – It was during a mid-2005 Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) meeting on Capitol Hill when award-winning journalist Askia Muhammad captured one of the most significant photos of his career.

Muhammad had doggedly covered then Chicago Sen. Barack Obama since he “first laid eyes on him” at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. Now, here was the Senator in a warm conversation with constituent and fellow Chicagoan Minister Louis Farrakhan. As leader of the Nation of Islam, Farrakhan is another star in Black America, but one whose name is synonymous with controversy.

Wasting no time, Muhammad snapped the news photo. But moments later, he faced a dilemma.
Obama had already become the darling of national Democratic politics. And the scent of a presidential run was strong.

Muhammad and others almost immediately realized that the public release of this photo could mean major trouble down the road. Mainly because of bigotry and fear-mongering, the public release of that photo could doom America’s chances of electing Obama as its first Black President.

Muhammad had not even left the scene when he received a call and the photo was being summoned by a member of the Congressional Black Caucus. Muhammad ultimately surrendered the disk to Minister Farrakhan’s chief of staff. And it remained one of America’s best hidden secrets for the next 12 years.

For the first time, more than a decade later, the glowing photograph of now former President Barack Obama and Minister Louis Farrakhan has been published in a book by Muhammad to be released Jan. 31 – “The Autobiography of Charles 67X”. Muhammad and some political observers still believe that if that photo had been released, it could have drawn enough fire – even from some of Obama’s supporters looking for excuses – to dent his chances of becoming president.

“I gave the picture up at the time and basically swore secrecy,” Muhammad said in an exclusive interview with the Trice Edney News Wire this week. “But after the nomination was secured and all the way up until the inauguration; then for eight years after he was President, it was kept under cover.”

As for any debate that the photo could have made a difference in the outcome of the Obama presidential election, Muhammad is emphatic: “I insist. It absolutely would have made a difference.”

He has agreement in high places.

“I do believe that it would have had a very, very negative affect in that given moment as far as the candidacy of candidate Obama at that time,” says Dr. Shayla Nunnally, president of the National Conference of Black Political Scientists. Her opinion was based largely on the “negative stereotypes about Muslim Americans about Black people and about their allegiance to the United States,” which have often been twisted and used to fit bigoted agendas – especially after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

“On top of that,” Nunnally said, “people have always characterized Minister Farrakhan as being a combative figure in American politics. That adds another layer.”

Nunnally, a professor of political science who also teaches in the Africana Studies Institute at the University of Connecticut, specializes in public opinion, political behavior, race and politics.

She questioned what the release of the photo will mean “even now because there’s so many conspiracy theories still floating.”

Obama, who is a Christian, has constantly been the target of bigoted attacks, Nunnally pointed out. When a woman called him an Arab during a public forum, even his re-election opponent Sen. John McCain retrieved the microphone and corrected her, saying, “No ma’am. He’s a decent family man.” Nunnally also recalled how former Secretary of State Colin Powell once weighed in against negative stereotyping of Muslims saying, “He’s a Christian…But the really right answer is, what if he is” a Muslim?

Nunnally concluded, “There are many, many, many layers of what that picture can represent to people in their various perceptions. So, I say this to mean that I can see that the release of that photo in that given moment, it would have been highly controversial.”

Also, pictured in the photo are Minister Farrakhan’s son-in-law, Leonard Farrakhan Muhammad; His son and security chief, Mustapha Farrakhan; Minister Farrakhan’s son Joshua Farrakhan; and the Rev. Willie Wilson, executive producer of the program for Farrakhan’s Million Man March in 1995 and a chairman of the 20th anniversary.

In an interview, Wilson says he doesn’t recall the photo and didn’t know he was in it. But hearing the description, he also was certain it could have hurt Obama’s campaign.

“I’m sure it would,” Wilson said. “Given all of the furor related to the sermon that his pastor, Jeremiah Wright did, I’m sure that it would more than likely have had a tremendous effect on his candidacy.”

Wilson says Farrakhan is so controversial because, “He speaks truth and this is a country that has in so many ways attempted to cover up the realities of its wrong doings of which Minister Farrakhan is quite vocal in bringing to light.”
The book tells of other notables who knew about the photograph and never divulged it. In addition to narratives of pivotal moments of his life, the autobiography is also a book of Muhammad’s poetry.

Columnist and political observer A. Peter Bailey, anticipating the book release, says he believes the photo would have created controversy for Obama, but could not have caused him to lose the election or his re-election because of the groundswell of Black voter support for him.

“It could have done some damage,” Bailey said. “But nothing could have stopped the election because Black support would have countered
 

Xyrax

Superstar
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
4,824
Reputation
2,404
Daps
27,179
You children are getting out of fukking pocket.

He almost lost the campaign because of Jeremiah Wright:





nikka what the fukk constitutes "almost". Looking at the polling, and more importantly the actual numbers/results, he won in a damn landslide both elections. All this shyt would have done is make the people that already hated him, hate him more. But they still only get one vote.

Also, fukk you nikka, negged. I ain't forgot that other bullshyt thread you had way back. I cant remember what it was about, but you was on some fukk shyt so Im negging everytime I see your avatar and feel some type of way.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,890
Reputation
-34,974
Daps
641,367
Reppin
The Deep State
I dunno about the picture but his relationship with Farrakhan was known before he was president. This isn't shocking to me and tbh I feel like I saw this before :patrice:
Didn't matter. There wasn't a picture.

The picture changes things.

It goes beyond rumor to "oh shyt, Obama was smiling with this guy"
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,890
Reputation
-34,974
Daps
641,367
Reppin
The Deep State

Wildhundreds

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
23,701
Reputation
3,981
Daps
99,487
So, the "anti-Semitic" nature of Farrakhan's rhetoric is conclusively reached, but the hysteria over Obama's religion and birthplace was only "apparently" motivated by race. Never mind that the key peddler of those lies about Obama's origins was none other than Donald Trump. The media are white supremacist propagandists whose words carve away at the truth, distorting our reality into one of their making.

Thats "white liberal media", sir.

Nikkas gonna understand by the end of this year, democrats are racist.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,890
Reputation
-34,974
Daps
641,367
Reppin
The Deep State
Farrakhan addressed meeting with Barack before he became president...and how he knew Obama had to keep that hidden...no shock here
Bruh, remember when we were talking about Trump and prostitutes?

And all it was, was a rumor?

Now we see hes out here fukking dozens of porn stars and paying them off...and now it gets REAL

Imagine if theres PHOTOS

Changes the whole game.
 
Top