OBAMA’S LOST ARMY

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
32,212
Reputation
5,472
Daps
73,234
OBAMA’S LOST ARMY
8f6cbbff96b90cc8132df133f1d6d2b7859f8d8e.jpeg


He built a grassroots machine of two million supporters eager to fight for change. Then he let it die. This is the untold story of Obama’s biggest mistake—and how it paved the way for Trump.
BY MICAH L. SIFRY

“I know you’re disappearing for a while to change diapers and play Mr. Dad,” Obama told Plouffe, “but just make sure you find time to help figure out how to keep our supporters involved. I don’t think we can succeed without them. We need to make sure they’re pushing from the grassroots on Washington and helping to spread what we’re trying to do in their local communities. And at the very least, we have to give them the opportunity to stay involved and in touch. They gave their heart and soul to us. This shouldn’t feel like a transactional relationship, because that’s not what it was. I want them along for the ride the next eight years, helping us deliver on all we talked about in the campaign.”

Three days later, Kapor emailed Edley and Alexander, frustrated that no progress was being made. “What is needed now,” he wrote, “is for the President-elect and his designees to decide how to move forward with Movement 2.0.” Would the group be independent or part of the DNC? Who would run it? How would it interact with the White House? “I don’t see how anything can happen until the project is given a green light and the basic issue of structure and leadership is settled by those with the power to do so,” Kapor concluded. “In other words, someone please just make a decision.”

Plouffe led Obama’s supporters to believe that the decision was in their hands. On November 19, he emailed a survey to everyone on the campaign’s list. “You’ve built an organization in your community and across the country that will continue to work for change,” Plouffe told them, “whether it’s by building grassroots support for legislation, backing state and local candidates, or sharing organizing techniques to effect change in your neighborhood. Your hard work built this movement. Now it’s up to you to decide how we move forward.”

Obama’s army was eager to be put to work. Of the 550,000 people who responded to the survey, 86 percent said they wanted to help Obama pass legislation through grassroots support; 68 percent wanted to help elect state and local candidates who shared his vision. Most impressive of all, more than 50,000 said they personally wanted to run for elected office.

But they never got that chance. In late December, Plouffe and a small group of senior staffers finally made the call, which was endorsed by Obama. The entire campaign machine, renamed Organizing for America, would be folded into the DNC, where it would operate as a fully controlled subsidiary of the Democratic Party. Plouffe stayed on as senior adviser, and put trusted field organizers Mitch Stewart and Jeremy Bird in charge of the new group. Bird says the OFA team was never even told about the idea for Movement 2.0. “None of these documents were even shared with us,” he says. “I’m not sure the senior staff on the campaign even knew they existed.”

Obama unveiled OFA a week before his inauguration. “Volunteers, grassroots leaders, and ordinary citizens will continue to drive the organization,” he promised. But that’s not what happened. Shunted into the DNC, MyBO’s tools for self-organizing were dismantled within a year. Instead of calling on supporters to launch a voter registration drive or build a network of small donors or back state and local candidates, OFA deployed the campaign’s vast email list to hawk coffee mugs and generate thank-you notes to Democratic members of Congress who backed Obama’s initiatives. As a result, when the political going got rough, much of Obama’s once-mighty army was AWOL. When the fight over Obama’s health care plan was at its peak, OFA was able to drum up only 300,000 phone calls to Congress. After the midterm debacle in 2010, when Democrats suffered their biggest losses since the Great Depression, Obama essentially had to build a new campaign machine from scratch in time for his reelection effort in 2012. (Plouffe and Messina declined requests to speak about Movement 2.0; Axelrod, Podesta, and Rouse said they had no comment.)

Ultimately, of course, the failure to keep the grassroots movement going rests with Obama. It was his original, and most costly, political mistake—not only a sin of omission, but a sin of imagination, one that helped decimate the Democratic Party at the state and local level and turn over every branch of the federal government to the far right. In December, in an exit interview with NPR’s Morning Edition, Obama himself sounded haunted by it. “You know, when I came into office, we were just putting out fires,” he said. “We were in a huge crisis situation. And so a lot of the organizing work that we did during the campaign, we started to see right away wasn’t immediately transferable to congressional candidates. More work would have needed to be done to just build up that structure. And, you know, one of the big suggestions that I have for Democrats as I leave, and something that, you know, I have some ideas about is: How do we do more of that ground-up building?”

This is just a snippet, I'm not really going to go through all that effort to post the whole thing, but if the mods want to edit my post and try to do that, then by all means. But it will let you know about Obama's biggest failure and his team's biggest failure.
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
56,945
Reputation
22,285
Daps
310,267
White Supremacy paved the way for Trump.

Leave it to some white guy to write a big ass article saying otherwise...

Yup.

But dropping the ball on OFA was a mistake. Still I'm not 100% sure the movement would have worked with Obama as president tho. Political movements work better when they're out of power, because things are theoretical and they're fighting against something. Obama in office having to compromise and work with conservative democrats led to deals that organizers didn't agree with 100%. Rebels...rebel. Harder to organize around defending a politician/president.

Same thing will happen to Trump on a smaller scale. His base won't be as fired up in 2018 when their movement is basically the status quo, they have the presidency, etc.

End of the day the 2010 tea party victories were heavily fueled by racist backlash against Obama. Maybe having an operational OFA would have stopped some of the bleeding but democrats were always gonna get fukked in that election. Terrible economy and Obamacare wasn't operational which allowed republicans to demonize it.
 

Crude Abolitionist

End Slavery
Supporter
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
17,716
Reputation
2,425
Daps
82,966
Yup.

But dropping the ball on OFA was a mistake. Still I'm not 100% sure the movement would have worked with Obama as president tho. Political movements work better when they're out of power, because things are theoretical and they're fighting against something. Obama in office having to compromise and work with conservative democrats led to deals that organizers didn't agree with 100%. Rebels...rebel. Harder to organize around defending a politician/president.

Same thing will happen to Trump on a smaller scale. His base won't be as fired up in 2018 when their movement is basically the status quo, they have the presidency, etc.

End of the day the 2010 tea party victories were heavily fueled by racist backlash against Obama. Maybe having an operational OFA would have stopped some of the bleeding but democrats were always gonna get fukked in that election. Terrible economy and Obamacare wasn't operational which allowed republicans to demonize it.

2018 will be the test for dems.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,123
Daps
641,726
Reppin
The Deep State
Yup.

But dropping the ball on OFA was a mistake. Still I'm not 100% sure the movement would have worked with Obama as president tho. Political movements work better when they're out of power, because things are theoretical and they're fighting against something. Obama in office having to compromise and work with conservative democrats led to deals that organizers didn't agree with 100%. Rebels...rebel. Harder to organize around defending a politician/president.

Same thing will happen to Trump on a smaller scale. His base won't be as fired up in 2018 when their movement is basically the status quo, they have the presidency, etc.

End of the day the 2010 tea party victories were heavily fueled by racist backlash against Obama. Maybe having an operational OFA would have stopped some of the bleeding but democrats were always gonna get fukked in that election. Terrible economy and Obamacare wasn't operational which allowed republicans to demonize it.
lets not forget...Obama caught hell for campaigning anyways. People were shaming him for even endorsing people.
 

Ms. Elaine

Spoiled Brat
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Messages
6,200
Reputation
-4,355
Daps
10,768
Reppin
Avocado Toast
He didn't let anything die. Those people only gave a fukk about him, nothing else.

And I don't know why Obama is being blamed for the failures of the DNC and their candidates. For the past decade, they've all been running some half-assed facsimilie of Obama's 08 and 12 campaigns instead of coming up with their own identities.
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
56,945
Reputation
22,285
Daps
310,267
2018 will be the test for dems.

Map is terrible for democrats but historically the out of power party gains seats during a midterm unless there's a special circumstance (2002 midterms during the post-911 patriotic period for instance, republicans did well because Bush was popular/country was at war).

from wikipedia:

These elections marked only the third time since the Civil War that the president's party gained seats in a midterm election (the first two being 1934 and 1998), and the first time that this happened under a Republican president. These elections were the second consecutive midterm elections held in a President's first term (regardless of the President's party) where Republicans netted a gain in both houses of Congress.

Trump is fukking up so I wouldn't be stunned if there's a readjustment in terms of people voting democrat. But minorities and young people have to get off their ass and vote....both groups don't show up enough in midterms.
 

Ms. Elaine

Spoiled Brat
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Messages
6,200
Reputation
-4,355
Daps
10,768
Reppin
Avocado Toast
Map is terrible for democrats but historically the out of power party gains seats during a midterm unless there's a special circumstance (2002 midterms during the post-911 patriotic period for instance, republicans did well because Bush was popular/country was at war).

from wikipedia:

These elections marked only the third time since the Civil War that the president's party gained seats in a midterm election (the first two being 1934 and 1998), and the first time that this happened under a Republican president. These elections were the second consecutive midterm elections held in a President's first term (regardless of the President's party) where Republicans netted a gain in both houses of Congress.

Trump is fukking up so I wouldn't be stunned if there's a readjustment in terms of people voting democrat. But minorities and young people have to get off their ass and vote....both groups don't show up enough in midterms.

Not enough. Democrats also have to put out candidate worth voting for.

They made gains in 06 and yet nothing changed.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
32,212
Reputation
5,472
Daps
73,234
White Supremacy paved the way for Trump.

Leave it to some white guy to write a big ass article saying otherwise...
@tru_m.a.c @DEAD7 @FAH1223 This is why 98% of HL's best posters left. You cannot have any convo in here without people going off on these random tangents and not even reading the article/topic. nikka had multiple posts on an article that takes 10 minutes to read within 1:30 minutes of me posting it.

Hopefully people look past the 3 or 4 Napoleon clones arguing with each other and read the actual point of the article. Good luck HL.
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
56,945
Reputation
22,285
Daps
310,267
Not enough. Democrats also have to put out candidate worth voting for.

They made gains in 06 and yet nothing changed.

I'm talking about 2018 midterms, not 2020 presidential election.

06 gains were due to Bush being toxic and the Iraq war being a disaster; they were inevitable gains, like the 2010 ones were IMO. And plenty changed between 06 and 2010. And 2008-2017.

Trump's approval is already historically bad for a new president. Hard to see it getting better. Dems should do good but like I said the map is terrible. Especially in the senate where they have to defend multiple seats.

IMO the wildcard if whether this fool will start a war. He's considering ground troops in Syria and antagonizing Iran. If he bungles us into an unpopular unnecessary war I could really see him fukking republicans in 2018.
 

Ms. Elaine

Spoiled Brat
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Messages
6,200
Reputation
-4,355
Daps
10,768
Reppin
Avocado Toast
I'm talking about 2018 midterms, not 2020 presidential election.

06 gains were due to Bush being toxic and the Iraq war being a disaster; they were inevitable gains, like the 2010 ones were IMO. And plenty changed between 06 and 2010. And 2008-2017.

Trump's approval is already historically bad for a new president. Hard to see it getting better. Dems should do good but like I said the map is terrible. Especially in the senate where they have to defend multiple seats.

IMO the wildcard if whether this fool will start a war. He's considering ground troops in Syria and antagonizing Iran. If he bungles us into an unpopular unnecessary war I could really see him fukking republicans in 2018.

I know exactly what you meant and my point still stands: Dems need to actually have a platform and CAMPAIGN on that platform. You're not gonna entice voters simply by not being an R, especially when you haven't done anything to fight back against what this lame duck administration has/will be doing for the next 2 years.
 
Top