Official 2013 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

[Miggs]

Luongo on the bench like

 

[K-Apps]

Sharks win it OT and sweep the Canucks

 

[bsmooth]

Better for the Canucks to go out like this, might finally be a wake up call that they ain't winning shyt with this core instead of tinkering and trying to add role players

 

[Miggs]

Luongo's reaction in the handshake line...he was dapping Sharks and laughing

 

[MikelArteta]

Canucks blow it up
Gillis is a horrible gm

sent from royalty via tapatalk

 

[MikelArteta]

Diaz was out there on the tying goal and on th game winning goal



sent from royalty via tapatalk

 

[Brozay]

Corey Crawford is pretty good huh?

Hawks still seem like they are coasting, need to play better next round. When they are on, nobody is touching them.

 

[MikelArteta]

Only Montreal would pay Brandon prust 3 mill a year

sent from royalty via tapatalk

 

[MikelArteta]

Pens have all this offense but no defense

Islanders were the worse match up for them.

Letang sucks in his defensive end

Their best defenders Murray, orpik are to slow to keep up with the speed of the islanders



sent from royalty via tapatalk

 

[Maschine_Man]

Tonight's game was a conspiracy against the Habs. So muthafukkin obvious.

C-O-N-SPIRACY!

and what would this conspiracy be?

its in WHO'S best interest if Ottawa wins?

 

[Maschine_Man]

So the Sens tying goal wasnt directed in with a clear kicking motion ?? So it has to be a wind up with ur leg or a bicycle kick

Rule 49.2:

A puck that deflects into the net off an attacking player’s skate who does not use a distinct kicking motion is a legitimate goal. A puck that is directed into the net by an attacking player’s skate shall be a legitimate goal as long as no distinct kicking motion is evident.



It wasn't a kicking motion

 

[Jamal514]

and what would this conspiracy be?

its in WHO'S best interest if Ottawa wins?

That was posted in the heat of the moment. There is no conspiracy but that doesn't change the fact the refereeing was garbage. We'll still win in 7 though.

 

[Jamal514]

Another race thread on HFboards, alot of people over there have their heads in the sand

ESPN, labeling hockey as a white (racist) sport? - HFBoards

 

[Maschine_Man]

Another race thread on HFboards, alot of people over there have their heads in the sand

ESPN, labeling hockey as a white (racist) sport? - HFBoards

it also looks like BSPN is trying to start some shyt(as usual)

 

[Miggs]

Rule 49.2:

A puck that deflects into the net off an attacking player’s skate who does not use a distinct kicking motion is a legitimate goal. A puck that is directed into the net by an attacking player’s skate shall be a legitimate goal as long as no distinct kicking motion is evident.



It wasn't a kicking motion

Define distinct kicking motion...it looked like more than a re direct to me,he def generated a forward kicking motion on that puck...

I think the rule is way too subjective,either make no goals allowed off skates or they all allowed....