Official Hillary Clinton is still fighting Thread...STARTS "ONWARD TOGETHER PAC"

[the cac mamba]

Are you saying he isn't?

no, im saying he *wasnt*. not in fukkin august

the DNC couldnt have made it more glaringly obvious that whillary bought that nomination in 2008. you dont stick with a candidate with that kind of national dirt

or maybe you can tell me why she was crying about comey costing her the election

 

[Pressure]

no, im saying he *wasnt*. not in fukkin august

the DNC couldnt have made it more glaringly obvious that whillary bought that nomination in 2008. you dont stick with a candidate with that kind of national dirt

or maybe you can tell me why she was crying about comey costing her the election

are you kidding?

Fraud lawsuit.
The still under investigation Trump foundation lawsuit.

The 100s of other lawsuits under investigation or settled?

But hey, we're only 3 presidents removed from Bill Clinton being elected despite various sexual assault allegations. Were you too young to remember this?





You're actually making my point. The outrage of a criminal investigation that was investigated multiple times and led to no charges is more outrageous to you than the numerous settled complaints and active investigations involving white male presidents.

 

[the cac mamba]

are you kidding?

Fraud lawsuit.
The still under investigation Trump foundation lawsuit.

The 100s of other lawsuits under investigation or settled?

But hey, we're only 3 presidents removed from Bill Clinton being elected despite various sexual assault allegations. Were you too young to remember this?





You're actually making my point. The outrage of a criminal investigation that was investigated multiple times and led to no charges is more outrageous to you than the numerous settled complaints and active investigations involving white male presidents.

did you compare the trump university lawsuit to the hillary investigation

just pathetic posting

 

[Pressure]

did you compare the trump university lawsuit to the hillary investigation

just pathetic posting

So far I've given you a fraud lawsuit settled.
A foundation being used for bribes.
Multiple sexual assault allegations

And you're saying that using a private email server is actually a worse crime despite the penalties being drastically less?

You're a clown.

 

[the cac mamba]

So far I've given you a fraud lawsuit settled.
A foundation being used for bribes.
Multiple sexual assault allegations

And you're saying that using a private email server is actually a worse crime despite the penalties being drastically less?

You're a clown.

yo....tell me you didnt just bring up;

-"a foundation used for bribes"? that one sounds familiar
-the sex accusations were garbage, especially given hillarys history of 'every woman deserves to be believed...unless theyre accusing my husband"
-anyone can file a lawsuit. and it was probably even true, but some dikkhead not feeling fulfilled by trump universitys degree is not comparable with national security


you're a better poster than this

 

[Pressure]

yo....tell me you didnt just bring up;

-"a foundation used for bribes"? that one sounds familiar
-the sex accusations were garbage, especially given hillarys history of 'every woman deserves to be believed...unless theyre accusing my husband"
-anyone can file a lawsuit. and it was probably even true, but some dikkhead not feeling fulfilled by trump universitys degree is not comparable with national security


you're a better poster than this

Are you saying that Bill Clinton's sexual assault allegations were bullshyt?

You're Too hard.

 

[the cac mamba]

Are you saying that Bill Clinton's sexual assault allegations were bullshyt?

You're Too hard.

im saying they were true and she slandered those women, so how can you bring them up to prop up hillary in this argument?

this is some flagrant shytposting

 

[Pressure]

im saying they were true and she slandered those women, so how can you bring them up to prop up hillary in this argument?

this is some flagrant shytposting

• you said she was not elected not because she was a woman, but because she was under criminal investigation.
• Then you asked when was the last time someone who was under criminal investigation was nominated.
• I then gave you three examples over the last 6 presidential elections who have received the parties nomination.
• Two of those 6 have been ELECTED
• Suggesting criminal investigations aren't the more likely reason for someone to not be elected.

 

[the cac mamba]

• you said she was not elected not because she was a woman, but because she was under criminal investigation.
• Then you asked when was the last time someone who was under criminal investigation was nominated.
• I then gave you three examples over the last 6 presidential elections who have received the parties nomination.
• Two of those 6 have been ELECTED
• Suggesting criminal investigations aren't the more likely reason for someone to not be elected.

it just occurred to me that im arguing with you in a thread called "hillary clinton is still fighting'

i concede. your candidate was the winner we needed

 

[ineedsleep212]

Upped this thread to see my link get ignored

 

[GnauzBookOfRhymes]

Not a Hillary fan but think about it in the other way.

Would a female version of Trump (business failures, history of lying, cheating, racism, sexism, sexual assault, weird relationship with daughter, multiple marriages, infidelity, unsavory ties to US enemies, child like narcissism, temper issues, intellectual laziness, coziness with fringes of society (neo-nazis as well as wall street robber barons), history of corruption, mob/mafia ties, immoral business practices, lack of consistency for political positions, blatant hypocrisy) ever be elected?

 

[ineedsleep212]

Not a Hillary fan but think about it in the other way.

Would a female version of Trump (business failures, history of lying, cheating, racism, sexism, sexual assault, weird relationship with daughter, multiple marriages, infidelity, unsavory ties to US enemies, child like narcissism, temper issues, intellectual laziness, coziness with fringes of society (neo-nazis as well as wall street robber barons), history of corruption, mob/mafia ties, immoral business practices, lack of consistency for political positions, blatant hypocrisy) ever be elected?

I think it's also a left vs right thing but all of the above.

 

[Pressure]

Misleading.

It actually shows a larger portion of her campaign was personal attacks. She

Upped this thread to see my link get ignored

It's accurate but misleading. The poll is accurate, his conclusion is misleading.

Trump's policy advertisements and these graphs are strictly for advertising were more pervasive, but offered no details. So sure, there were a lot of advertisements that said build a wall, deport Mexicans, bring back coal jobs, and repeal Obama care, but then again we are lowering the bar for campaigning on actual policy and not just ideas.

Hillary discussed more policy and in more detail.


But the conclusion they are making is negative politics doesn't work is a farce considering Trumps entire primary and speeches were built on negative politics.

 

[Pressure]

That aside, I think most would agree that Hillary having the stronger platform should have ran on that and not going full swing on just Trump's personal flaws. It did her well against Bernie .

 

[Paradise50]

Always said that is why she lost....poorly ran campaign



literally shytted on easy votes to appease some twitter folks